Islamic State is very much Islamic and only traitors and idiots say otherwise

The following is from Mindwizard - writing in the comments section of the Independent in response to yet another ludicrous outburst to the effect the Islam is a religion of peace and anyone who kills others, blows him or herself up, rapes children, imports and sells heroin etc etc etc, isn't a moslem, but a mystical Islamists(!) and shouldn't be classed alongside the 1 or 2 lovely muzzies who get a bad name from the billions of people who use the same label but are something else! The stupid pro-moslem drivel was spouted by the arch-idiot kosher conservative lover of all things moslem, (elected by voting fraud) UK Prime Minister, David Cameron.  Interestingly, when trying to post a direct link to Mindwizard, the link had gone dead (or perhaps been removed)...

by Mindwizard:

Is it me, or is there a very selective historical understanding of Islam as propounded by its scholars and leaders at play here? Back in 1979, Ayatollah Khomeini – a symbol of authority for 200 million Shia Muslims - said:

“Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled or incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of [other] countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world…Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless.”

To the extent that this reflects orthodox thinking for half of the Islamic world, I would say it has something pretty fundamental in common with the ideology of Isis.

Let’s also remember the words of Maududi, the most prominent Sunni Muslim scholar of the 20th Century (and the first recipient of the Saudi Arabian King Faisal International Award for his services to Islam in 1979):

“Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam…the objective of the Islamic ‘ jihād’ is to eliminate the rule of an un-Islamic system and establish in its stead an Islamic system of state rule.”

Surely as unambiguous a definition of Jihad as it is possible to have? And we’re not talking ‘spiritual’ jihad here. Maududi founded Jamaat-e-Islami which funds Hamas and supports Lakshar-e-Taiba, widely held to be responsible for the Mumbai attacks.. 

Was he, too, perverting a great religion? If so, we should challenge the Saudi rulers, who clearly revered Maududi. If not, we can hardly insist that the ISIS project is un-Islamic.

Until we recognise that establishing a Caliphate is attractive in mainstream Islamic thought, we will never understand why 32 percent of Muslim students polled in the UK in 2008 said killing in the name of religion was justified and a third supported a worldwide Islamic caliphate. Until we acknowledge that the appeal of violent Jihad goes way beyond some tiny group of extremists, we will never understand why the 2007 ICM poll showed that 20 percent of British Muslims sympathised with the 7/7 bombers. How precisely are we meant to counter the so-called ‘extremist narrative’ attracting young Muslims to join Isis if we sacrifice honest discussion for a politically-correct fudge of the truth.

Just an added note of interest: I earlier posted a shorter version of the above on The Guardian website. They removed it for an unspecified breach of 'Community Standards' - although I could not for the life of me work out which one they chose to apply. After all, the words I quoted are not mine but those of prominent Muslim scholars. The poll results of Muslim student opinion and post 7/7 Muslim sentiment were widely reported in The Guardian itself. So why the need to censor? A lack of intellectual courage, perhaps. A pusillanimous fear of mentioning Saudi Arabia's complicity with Islamist ideology (however grounded in fact that observation might be), almost certainly. A desire to silence a clearly articulated but unpopular opinion, possibly.

Sodomite Pride: Why are we forced to celebrate male perverts obsessions with men's bottoms (not to mention minge-eating lezzers)?

Today is pride day - rainbow flags are flying from public buildings, social media propaganda outlets like facebook are awash with the same.  In cities across the decadent west, sodomites and their female counterparts are dressed in their best bedroom gear, practically having sex in the streets as idiot liberals and their poor confused children cheer on a display of sordid sexual debauchery.  The police (those who aren't mincing about in bondage wear and pink færy costumes and themselves participating in the pride marches) are failing to uphold their legal requirement to protect the innocence of children, not arresting a single individual for public obscenity. 

One has to question what the whole pride issue is?  Homosexuality is very simply the fulfillment of a desire by people who have failed to leave adolescence and become healthy adults, to put their todgers into each others bottoms.  So gay pride must therefore be an overwhelming desire to shout to everyone within earshot (whether we like to hear or not), that these individuals take great pride in touching each others bums with their hands, penes, a variety of objects and of course tongues - taking great pride in the ability to swallow fæces and semen whilst dressed as one of the Village People or as Danny Le Rue (making pride in the 1970s part of their unwholesome perversion!)

Sexuality differs from person to person.  What one person considers normal, another may not.  What consenting adults get up to behind closed doors is their own business and no-one elses.  Taking to the streets in sexual costumes waving flags declaring that they are proud of their bedroom athletics makes their sexuality the business of everyone.  This invites interest in the over-representation of homosexuals in the ranks of the criminal pædophile fraternity.  It isn't just moslems who like to rape children.  Remove moslems from the statistics and the percentage of homosexual pædophiles rockets to the point where heterosexual pædophilia looks like a statistical anomaly.  Why aren't the pride marchers carrying banners of destroyed children, if being gay is something we should all admire?  If homosexuals were as 'good as you' and me (as they claim), then the number of pædophiles amongst them would be such as to make those who prey on children a very small minority.  Sadly, that isn't the case.

Homosexuals do not restrict their antics to the bedroom.  They have their own pubs and nightclubs and entire areas of various cities (including much of Brighton and Canal Street in Manchester).  That in itself isn't a problem really, and could be seen as a positive thing as it allows for people who wish to sodomise one another to meet amongst people who share this desire.  Creating a parallel society with no links to the majority population cannot be anything but a good thing.  The more separate they make themselves, the better.  Unfortunately, they do not want to be separate.  Gay pride is a euphemism; what they really mean is gay power.  The pride marchers are gay supremacists and they will stop at nothing to queer the nation to give them total control.

What is a problem with the gay agenda is that they operate in a manner which would make the Freemasons blush - when homosexuals gain positions of authority in the workplace, government or elsewhere, they use their positions to discriminate against people who do not share their proclivities.  Whereas heterosexuals don't generally give a damn about the sexual activities of others, homosexual managers make a point of demanding that only their fellow bottom-lickers are promoted.  When they achieve positions in government, they use their influence to push for legislation which discriminates against excellence and in favour of perversion.  A man can apply for a job he is woefully unqualified for and get it simply because he likes to suck cock.  Gay pride must surely include an element of arrogant pride in the stupidity of ordinary people in allowing for legislation to be enacted which denies them advancement in work unless they indulge in turd burglary and poo-eating.

Not content with having Civil Partnerships created to give homosexuals legal protection in old age, allowing for one 'partner' of a couple to gain the equivalent of Widow's Benefit in the advent of the other dying (forgetting that homosexuals are notoriously promiscuous and thus unlikely to form lasting relationships), gay power activists have taken it upon themselves to destroy the institution of marriage, which exists to protect children and families.  There is no need for gay marriage; civil partnerships are 'marriage' in all but name.  The fact that the name of marriage itself has been usurped is an act of political terrorism, with no benefit to the homosexuals, other than to make a mockery of real marriage.

In schools, sodomites have pushed through sex education classes which encourage underage boys to sodomise one another and to fall for the lure of predatory homosexual pædophiles.  The natural idea of one man and one woman marrying, living together monogamously, and raising children to do likewise, has been steamrollered to make way for the gay lifestyle of anonymous casual sex, with the accompanying increase on sexually transmitted diseases, depression, mental illness, inability to form stable relationships, experiments with race-mixing, fatherless bastard children and many other ills which are wrecking society.  Gay pride is a pride in creating misery for the rest of us and imposing a lifestyle which was previously (and correctly) identified as dysfunctional and borne of mental illness, upon society as a whole.

The rainbow flag should not be flown over public buildings.  To do so is to afford it recognition as one would a sovereign nation.  The rainbow flag is not a symbol of pride, but of supremacist gay power.  Perhaps though, this may be a good thing.  The more homosexuals insult us by demanding that we are denied employment so that they can get cushy jobs which they are not qualified enough to be entitled to; the more they use their control over government to subvert our laws, corrupt our children and make their dominance impossible to ignore, the more we will be able to identify them as a separate sovereign entity.  Perhaps a solution to the homosexual problem would be to accept their rainbow flag as a political symbol, and to embrace their separatism.  

Greece is financially ruined thanks to the bankers (including a good many gay power sorts).  Perhaps the pink mafia could use their financial clout to buy a couple of Greek islands, returning the lesbians to the region from which their name comes and taking the sodomites with them - obviously to a different island, considering how genuinely sexist they are (it is well known that gays hate women and lesbians hate men).  

Imagine a world in which all the sodomites have somewhere to live, to bum each other in the streets if they wish to, and where they can harm no one who doesn't enjoy the dubious pleasures of buggery?  Imagine a world where the lettuce-lickers of Hebden Bridge can join with their fellows from across the globe to wear their purple Doc Martens, shave their heads, strap on fake knobs and crack on with their perversions? A couple of decadent islands full of writhing sex addicts, gobbling down fæces and dressing as prostitutes of the opposite sex, would be a small price to pay for liberating the rest of the world from individuals whose lust for perversion comes second only to their lust for power.  Let their people go - please let their people go!

England is NOT Pakistan - honestly! Although you would be forgiven for thinking it is

England is a fiefdom of the global zionist banking cabal.  Ruled from the City of London, England is officially governed by the UK Parliament at Westminster, meaning for those who understand the semi-federal structure of the UK, that whereas  Scotland has its own complete Parliament, Wales, Northern Ireland and London each have an Assembly, England has no representation of its own and is a vassal state controlled by imperialistic financial parasites.  But be that as it may, this rant is not about the outrageous lack of democracy in England, rather about the lack of Englishness in England!

London and the major cities have been thoroughly colonised by Third World invaders at the behest of Jewish oligarchs.  The nature-hating non-Europeans have congregated in the urban centres bringing with them their culture-enriching diversity, including such marvels as ritual animal cruelty (halal and shechita), child rape (so-called grooming), heroin and crack dealing, prostitution and many many more marvels which a once civilised people now embrace as the new barbarity and criminality sweeps across our land.

Anyone listening to the news over the last week, would be forgiven for wondering if the country known as England really is but another part of Pakistan.  BBC Radio Sheffield aired a propaganda piece on behalf of the Pakistani community of Rotherham in which Rotherham Council was ridiculed for daring to suggest that Taxis in the metropolitan area should be equipped with CCTV in order to deter drivers from using their vehicles to ferry young white girls to take-aways to there be raped.  The BBC very carefully forgot to mention that all the taxi drivers involved and all the take-away staff involved in the rape trade in Rotherham (and they could for that matter have added in Halifax, Huddersfield, Bradford, Leeds, Rochdale, Oldham, Manchester, Newcastle, Luton, Slough, High Wycombe, Birmingham, Leicester, Bristol etc etc etc (in fact EVERY town and city in England (well, the entire UK) with a Pakistani population), are Pakistanis with UK documents (well, that is those who have bothered to get legal status that is!)

The BBC not only tried to hide the Pakistani origin of the rapist taxi drivers, rapist kebab shop staff and rapist mosque enthusiasts, they got experts in to state that the girls were liars and most likely motivated by racism.  Funnily the 'experts' were themselves Pakistanis and worked in the taxi trade and quite possibly involved in the mass rape of indigenous children - so obviously they were clearly impartial and trustworthy!  The programme went on to moan that it was only a small handful of criminals who had given the Pakistani community a bad name and that if the CCTV could be turned off when people weren't taking fares, then it would simply be a tax to penalise the generally good hard-working invader population.  To finish the propaganda piece, the BBC had a deranged woman come on to praise the taxi drivers for being friendly and respectful.  I didn't know whether to laugh at the lies coming from my radio or drive to Sheffield to catch the actress with her pocketful of shekels leaving the BBC propaganda ministry, to gain evidence of the lie factory - but considering that the moronic majority have already forgotten that over one million children have been raped by Pakistanis in England, what would have been the point?

The next bit of 'news' came from Dewsbury - slightly north of Rotherham, but still in the old West Riding of Yorkshire.  A Pakistani who was brought up there by the usual 'moderate' moslem community had somehow been corrupted by internet 'groomers' (using a term the BBC love to bandy about but in this case to make it appear that the poor little love was a victim just like the children raped by his people (and probably by him personally in some cases).  The poor little mite had been turned to ISIS (which we all know isn't really Islam even though it looks, sounds and stinks just like the bullshit of the Mohammedan cultists) and is now the youngest ever suicide bomber to have come from England.  The murdering scum did not come from England - he was a Pakistani who happened to be a part of the invasion force which occupies swathes of our territory; he was a moslem no matter what the liars in mosques and government say; he was no victim - the people he murdered were though!

The Rotherham story was quickly joined in the memory hole by the story of the Dewsbury-infesting murderer, as the next bit of news was that a family of Pakistanis had left Bradford (a spit away from Dewsbury in an adjoining council area heading north) to go become murderers and prostitutes for ISIS - you know, that un-Islamic group that moslems across the UK condemn publicly but support behind closed doors and in the open when in sufficient numbers.  The Pakistanis this time were three slags and nine children, who according to the BBC propaganda machine (this time BBC Radio Leeds) were from loving families and whose departure has been a deep shock to the husbands/fathers (/cousins etc!).  The pathetic BBC interviewed the men folk who spoke obviously from a script of 'love' and understanding, stating that the families would be welcome and that they could continue as before.  This was just another episode in the ongoing saga of women and children going to fight for Islam in ISISland - remember the slags who left Dewsbury in almost identical circumstances?  It was only in April, yet of course like all things Pakistani, that has been quietly pushed out of the public arena.  How embarrassing it must be for the BBC and government that no sooner have they hushed up one act of Pakistani lunacy than more Pakistanis provide a new one.

Pakistanis do not have the emotion of love, any more than they have that of tolerance or empathy - these are European traits which the BBC is trying to attribute to a people who do not have them at all in a clear case of deluded anthropomorphism.  The children and their mothers will doubtless be willing participants in the sex jihad for the barbarian fighters of the Islamic State, and may yet provide a new record for the youngest terrorist to have at some point lived on British soil.  Its a pity that the whole family didn't go to Syria, but then someone has to stay behind to get UK Welfare payments to channel to them over there!

The next bit of 'news' was that some madwoman of African descent who is

forever prattling on about 'racism' and crying that she is being held back by evil white racists, made a trip to the old East End of London to encourage 'British' girls to become leaders of the future.  The deranged woman was Michelle Obama whose husband is the directly elected President of the USA - the most powerful position that the people of that country could bestow upon anyone, but still she thinks that she is held back because of  her skin colour!  Obviously a woman of low IQ and paranoid delusions which would make her a suitable case for committing for treatment in a lunatic asylum, Obama met with girls in an area where not long ago one would have found proud Cockneys of the Pearly Kings and Queens variety.  Not so now though - these 'British' children were hijab and burka-clad Pakistanis.  No doubt Obama will be very proud when they go on to be leaders in providing excuses to their rapist husbands and fathers, or perhaps toddle off to join IS and blow people up (when they're too old to provide other work to the honourable terrorists!)

Pakistanis rape our children at will and are protected by the Law from criticism.  They routinely head off to Syria and Turkey to get terrorist training; they are let back into the UK to wait until they are activated to wage war on us.  They control the heroin and crack trade, with the associated prostitution trade in human flesh.  They steal from taxpayers by having mosques built at our expense and their lives paid for by our Welfare system, while we have to rely on soup kitchens and food parcels.  Those that bother to get legal work take the best paying jobs, thus denying us all but the most menial labour - the liberal defamers still spout the racist slander that we are too lazy to do hard work and as a result we need immigration to do the jobs we won't!  This is laughable.  Pakistanis subvert our laws, making polygamy, incest, spousal abuse, honour killings (murder), animal abuse, theft, anti-White racism, Islamic bigotry and many other evils the norm across the occupied territories of the UK.  We who speak out are arrested.  Moslem Blasphemy Laws are unofficially in place in the UK, with people being arrested for reading the koran in public - let alone burning that hate-filled tome of violence and supremacist drivel.

England is NOT Pakistan, but it is fast becoming so.  Unless every single Pakistani is removed from our shores our future is one of servitude and ultimately genocide.  And worst of all, liberals of our own kind are the ones pushing this grim possibility into a reality.  Ironically, right now in the Pakistani Occupied Territories of Yorkshire, with Pakistanis off the streets and away from the shops due to their stupid festival of ramadan (where they eat like pigs from dusk until just before dawn and then arrogantly expect us to be impressed with their abstinence from food for a few hours, which they claim lets them know how people who are poor and hungry feel (such as many English who do without very often, but do not have the binges and actually do experience hunger)), England feels English.  Our country is a great place with lovely people - it is only when the Pakistanis are behind closed doors that we can appreciate how life would be without these parasites in our midst.  Even then the Jewish supermarkets (Tesco, Sainsburys etc) offend us with posters in arabic glorifying the religion of the child rapist/murderer mohammed.  There is another way, and we'd better get actively involved in FIGHTING for it, or our homeland will become just another moslem toilet, with us used as the toilet paper.

The UK Referendum on an EU exit - Rigged against Freedom

The Prime Minister, David Cameron, has hinted that 16 and 17 year olds will be allowed to vote in the freedom referendum.  Why?  Because, he correctly states, the coming referendum on the UK's membership of the EU is one which will impact upon the future of the country.  If the voters say No to Freedom and Yes to EU Slavery (just as the rigged vote in Scotland gave the impression that the people had willingly opted for keeping on the shackles of London), then life will become ever worse and the peoples of the British Isles will have signed the death warrant of their childrens' future.  This is what is very likely to occur.

The assertion that people of 16 and 17 should have a vote because their futures are at stake, seems reasonable enough, but it is looking at reality from the wrong direction.  Most teenagers have never had the experience of seeing prices soar because of VAT.  Most teenagers have not had the opportunity to escape the pro-EU brain-washing

of the misnamed education system.  As a result, most teenagers will vote No to Freedom because they will have no comprehension of exactly what the EU is, and will see it as a cosy club of nations, membership of which is great for partying on far off beaches, and anyway it wouldn't be 'nice' to not be in it (to use an emotional level of debate which those without life experience will not have seen for the fraud it is.)

The future of the country IS at stake.  It is those who are responsible for future generations who should have a say - and only those people.  In the referendum, people from pakistan who happen to have UK passports will be allowed to vote, and they will vote to stay in the EU because they have no idea of what it is to be English, Scottish, Irish or Welsh; to them the EU is simply the geographical area of Europe and a place for the teaming millions of Asia to swarm into.  The UK being free of the EU would hamper the ability of legions of non-Europeans to flood into the UK through the ridiculous fact that entry into one EU country means entry into all.  So, the immigrant population will vote No to Freedom and Yes to open borders so that their parasitic relatives can flood in and devour our land like locusts with the ability to swarm onto another EU country should pickings here become less good than at present.  No-one who is not indigenous should have any right to vote in our country at all - or be in it for that matter!

The future of our country should be decided by people with a stake in the future; people with children.  People who do not have children have no right in deciding what will happen to the country when they have gone.  If they leave no children, then they are not a part of the future and have no right to have a say in anything which comes after them.  

Childless adults can only be motivated by selfish interests - mostly how they will be financially effected by the referendum result.  Childless teenagers are too inexperienced

to have a say, and are only being given a vote because the Government knows that they have been indoctrinated into loving the EU Big Brother and can be relied upon to vote to keep us in the prison state.  Foreigners shouldn't even be here, let alone allowed any say in how we operate in our own country.  Because they have most to gain by our freedom, they too can be relied upon to vote to destroy us - which is what they are doing in many ways by their presence anyway.

The EU Referendum is rigged before it has even begun.  The Government will pump vast amounts of our money into propaganda to make gullible people think that the EU is a good idea for the ordinary people, and not just a club for the bankers and global financial mafia.  Cameron has already lied through his teeth, stating that no-one in the Government will be allowed to campaign for Freedom, then when caught out acting like a dictator, coming up with a pathetic story that he really meant to say that no one in the Government must be allowed to oppose the Referendum process and the EU renegotiation - which is something only people opposed to leaving the prison would do anyway (notably the Liberals and the SNP).

When the Referendum is done, the people will have lost and the UK will be forever ensnared by the EU.  Having given our consent (with the help of selfish money-grubbers, hostile foreigners and naive children), the EU will accelerate its destruction of sovereignty, push through plans to force all member states to accept millions of Asian and African 'refugees' (financial parasites with hostile religions and a pathological hatred of all that is European).  Should the people happen to vote Yes for Freedom and No to Tyranny, the votes will be miscounted/lost and the result will go in the favour of the despots.  The latest Tory victory is proof that democracy doesn't exist in the UK, as the present Government only achieved power by outright electoral fraud,  They will do whatever it takes to keep us in the prison state and then claim it is our choice and use that as a mandate to destroy us.  Don't get excited at the fact that we are getting a referendum - we have already lost.

Meet the Rapists! Yorkshire slides into Hell and the Authorities use Your Money to Celebrate!

Yesterday, Bradford hosted a music festival to celebrate the diversity of the decaying cadaver of a once proud Yorkshire city.  Today it is Halallyfacked Halifax's turn with the Meet the Rapists Neighbours festival in Pakis People's Park.

These 'festivals' are paid for by the local authorities (Bradford and Calderdale), or more to the point by tax payers in these areas.  Considering that in both these areas a very large percentage of the population take advantage of the exemption from paying council tax which religious places are granted (easily obtained if you state that where you live is used at least once a week for a religious function - and if you are of a favoured majority minority who can't be questioned lest you scream islamophobia racism), then what this really means is that working indigenous and European people foot the bill for festivals to which they really wouldn't want to go, unless they had a desire to buy hard drugs, be sexually/racially/religiously abused and have their children raped.

Metropolitan Yorkshire has seen thousands of young boys and girls raped by those who we are supposed to be pleased to have come here to enrich our homeland.  It is awash with heroin and crack and the associated criminal activities (burglary, theft, violence) of those who are stupid enough to take hard drugs (or for that matter soft ones which are sold by the same people and contaminated with all manner of health-wrecking substances).  Our county is dying and the cause of our woes is plain to see in their fancy dress from the middle ages (of cause accepting that those behind the invasion are a different minority more associated with the banking sector than kebabs!)  The police won't arrest the rapists, considering those who object to having their children raped to be far worse than those doing it (racism bad, rapism(!) good).  Social services will hound people for not wanting their children to be put at risk, then will bring children who are in 'care' (state-orchestrated abuse hostels) to events such as are now going on.

Doesn't it make you feel so happy to live in a progressive liberal democracy?  Foreigners destroy the lives of our children and the authorities lay on festivals where children are bussed in so they can do it all the more easily.  The drug dealers and pædophiles have vulnerable people brought to them at these festivals, so they don't have to put so much 'work' into their chosen trades.  The police are on hand to make sure no-one gives the criminals a well-deserved beating (or calls them names).  This country is a madhouse, and getting madder by the minute.

The last word in this sorry saga of mass immigration, resulting in mass unemployment, race riots, religious intolerance (by them against us), bigotry, drug dealing, pædophilia, terrorism, violence, halal brutality to animals, the destruction of our land to house our enemies etc etc etc, belongs to the idiot 'call me Dave, I'm part Jewish you know' Cameron, recently re-elected as UK Prime Minister by the idiot British public: 'It is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the mudslime way of life, not the other way around'.  And this traitor will rule over us for the next five years on behalf of his global banker owners.  Never mind though, eh?  There must be something good on the telly so change the subject and forget about it!  The new stiff upper lip is the bend over and take it.

Another Silver-Spoon Parasite Slithers Forth

I do not watch the brain-washing instrument known as television.  I flick through the radio when I am driving, in order to avoid the nauseous propaganda and sickening Americanisation which is spewed across the airwaves.  I do not read Establishment 'news' papers, as they are just another aspect of the lying manipulative machine which laughingly calls itself the free press.  In spite of a concerted effort to avoid all news of the Windsor mafia's latest creation, I have failed and I have become aware that another parasite has been born.  It seems avoiding the transmissions of the enemy is impossible - and will be as long as people who do follow the media, pass on the tripe they have been fed.

I am a Republican.  I make no apologies for this.  I detest the Windsor mafia and the idea that a family can control an entire country simply because generations ago members of their bloodline bent over backwards to sell the country to the Jewish money power.  What I find absolutely incomprehensible is the fact that there are still people who are allowed to have children, hold down jobs, vote, and occupy positions of power over and responsibility for others, who believe that the UK should be a Kingdom, and that the parasites in Buckingham Palace should be given respect by us serfs.  I would love to see the monarchists join with their idols in receiving  the same treatment as the cousins of the Windsor filth enjoyed in Russia nearly a century ago.  I would settle for the parasites being kicked out of the country to live with their owners in Israel, but to be honest, I would prefer that they went the way of the Tsar and his odious family.

To people who think that I am mean-spirited and ranting because of jealousy, I have the following to say.  It is surely better to be 'mean-spirited' than to be a compliant lapdog and as for jealousy, that accusation acknowledges that the Windsor scum live pampered lives which they only have because of being born into a family of rats who prosper at our expense. The Windsors live on money gained through theft and treason to the people - including those unfortunate enough to have lived under Empire rule.  They are a dysfunctional family of perverts, serial adulterers, rapists, murderers and low life vermin.  They get away with all manner of evil because they have the money and power to do so.  The Windsors are not merely above the law, they are the law.  

The Windsors hypocritically preach about the wonders of race-mixing and mass immigration whilst keeping their own Judaised bloodline pure and living in palaces and castles well-fortified from ever having to deal with a single coloniser (or common indigenous person) in the real world.  Their family has exploited the people of this country for centuries, being responsible for the mass slaughter of the two World Wars, the brutality of the Capitalist system (their forebears' children weren't sent down mines or into working machinery or up lit chimneys - but ours were), as well as international crimes such as the American Revolutionary War of Independence, the Slave Trade and the system of global imperialism (the so-called British Empire) which has been used to justify mass immigration in recent decades.

So, no, I am not excited at the birth of yet another parasite which will laud over the rest of us due to some drivel about being descended from David the King of the Jews, who according to the Bible was a direct descendant of Adam (would you Adam and Eve it?  I wouldn't!) and thus of the Jewish god (the one who lovingly gave Adam everything and then sent him a talking snake so that he would eat some fruit which had been put there for the purpose of giving the aforementioned god an excuse to kick him out of his home to live in misery - nice!)

People who sing God Save the Queen are obviously mentally ill.  In a sane world they would be hospitalised and treated for their delusional behaviour.  But of course, in a sane world, the Windsors and their counterparts worldwide, would be hanging from lamp posts.  I'm not a fan of Lenin, but for all his crimes, at least he dealt with the Romanovs!  One day, maybe the Windsors will likewise be brought to justice.

George the Dragon Slayer is no friend of England

Today is 'saint' George's Day.  Not long ago, I would have been joining in the calls for today to be a national holiday, and bemoaning the fact that whereas Scotland, Wales and Ireland celebrate their national days, we do not.  At the risk of upsetting people who wrap themselves in the Cross of 'saint' George and become English nationalists for one day a year, I think we need to take a step back from this contrived kosher nationalism; we need to look at the symbolism to see that we are yet again being led astray by people who make a living by lying to us.

George was a Christian martyr of Greek stock, who lived in Asia Minor.  The Cross of 'saint' George was popularised at the time of the Crusades, and is now making a comeback as yet again, attention is focussed upon our Moslem enemies.  As a symbol of resistance against the Moslem hordes, it has its uses - that is until one looks at the origins of Islam and finds that it (like the Church of Rome) is but another aspect of Judaism.  Fighting against one branch of the Cult of Abraham, Moses and Noah, by clinging to another, makes as much sense as fighting against the evils of the banking industry by closing down an account and opening one with a rival bank.  Just as we can't break the usurers by moving money from account to account, nor can we break the Judæo-Churchian-Moslem nightmare by supporting one faction against the others.

The George's Cross is a symbol of the power of the Judaised Establishment.  It is the flag of the City of London - the centre of the financial system and a State within a State, being in England physically, but not a part of the nation upon whose territory it festers.  The people who imposed the George's Cross upon England are the descendants of the Norman Invaders of 1066 - the year of the start of the English Holocaust.  Waving a banner with the emblem of our enemies upon it is akin to bowing to the Windsor mafia. We give them power when we submit to their rule, even when this is done by embracing their symbols and their customs.

Before the hated Normans, England was a happy land of Anglo-Saxons and Celts (along with other kindred peoples).  Our emblem was the White Dragon, which although at war with the Red Dragon to the west, provided a recognition of the deeper unity of the peoples of the Isles.  With the Normans came the Judaic system of government, finance and religion.  The massacre of our people was white-washed from history by the Establishment historians, who just like the media of today, made the greatest evils of the Ruling power into virtues.  The genocide of the Britons and Saxons by the Normans is now known as the Norman Conquest and the righteous crushing of 'revolts' - the destruction of our people was normalised and since 1066 we have been slaves in our own lands, with our Celtic neighbours suffering under the heel of the same oppressors whilst 'nationalists' unwittingly cling to the banner of the oppressors, not daring to think that we would be better off burning the flags of the Establishment than rallying to them.

The 23rd of April is not our national day - it is the national day of the parasites in power.  Just as we reject the Union Flag as a symbol of London imperialism, so we must reject the flag of 'saint' George - a man who was not English, but rather an outsider who belonged to a Semitic Cult which destroyed our culture and murdered millions of our kin in the name of a fabricated Jewish deity.  I used to wave the flag of George (saint to those who follow the teachings of the Judæo-Churchian-Islamic Cult, in much the same way as the brutal rapist, mohamed, is a 'prophet' to the modern invaders from Pakistan), but I also used to believe in the færytales of the Vatican.

Waking up to the reality of the world we live in, means abandoning our old habits.  Just as I will never again set foot in a Church, nor will I ever again wave a banner of the self-chosen 'elite'.  It is time to bring back the Dragon.  Contrary to the lies of the Establishment, the symbolic slaying of the Dragon by 'saint' George was not the victory of the Semitic Cult over the peoples of England; rather it was a tragic but temporary loss for our people.  Now is the time to reclaim our nation and cast out the Dragon Slayers.  The Dragon is not the symbol of the 'devil' (to use a term referring to a Semitic fantasy), it is the symbol of the people of Europe.  We need to choose our banners wisely, and understand what we support when we raise them.