Jews Executed in Auschwitz: 117, not 6 million!

As a poor old man has been given a life sentence in Germany for simply being a Book Keeper in Auschwitz (the man who recorded the personal belongings of the internees in order to ensure they got everything back upon their release), it is timely to look at the real death toll, not the fantasy propaganda figures.  In all, 60,441 Jews died in Auschwitz, 60,304 of natural causes (including 58,240 of typhus caused by Jewish-controlled 'allied' terrorist bombers) and a mere 117 were executed.  The entire death toll was less than the number of civilians massacred in Dresden and not much more than those slaughtered in the Blitz as a result of being deliberately sacrificed in a war which no-one wanted (except the Jews), by the Jewish controlled government of the UK.  Contrary to the whining Jewish lies of 6 million being done to death due to racism (a nonsense label used to silence thought), 117 Jews were deliberately killed, and these were people whose criminality necessitated the death penalty.  Think of the miscarriage of justice for those murdered at Nuremberg and in show trials ever since.  Think of how we as a race have been libeled by our enemies and have cowered before the racist stick which labels us as genocidal maniacs - whilst we are being subjected to genuine genocide at the hands of the same Jews who dare to call us barbarians.

They said that 6 million Jews were murdered by Germany, of whom 4 million died in Auschwitz. this was revised down (by the Jews) to 1.5 million (yet the total figure did not drop to 3.5 million, but remained 6 million.  Now we can see that 0.06 million died in Auschwitz, of whom only 117 were 'murdered', but the figure doesn't drop to 2 million, it remains 6 million!  The Holocaust fable is a vile and vicious piece of racist propaganda which doesn't stand up to scrutiny.  So weak is the færytale that it has to be protected by law, with people going to prison for questioning it, and as we have seen this week, elderly Germans given what amounts to life sentences for being anywhere near the camp. Oskar Groening killed no-one and should have been thanked by the Jews for carefully recording their belongings, but instead he will die in prison, Such is the ungrateful and hateful nature of the Jewish victors.  Interestingly, the Jewish prosecutors danced between saying that 1 million Jews dies in Auschwitz and the lower figure of 300,000.  The lie is so obvious that it is embarrassing, yet people still lose their freedom and the Jews still retain their power as a result of it (and don't forget Palestine either!)

Source for the following: http://www.heretical.com/miscella/rudolf.html

Official German Record of Prisoners in Auschwitz Concentration Camp May 1940 through December 1944

These statistics concerning prisoners in Auschwitz camp purport to be taken directly from Soviet archive material, now available on microfilm from the former Soviet Central Archives. Also, a good deal of corroborative material from the German Archives concerning the German State Railways has been located in the German State Archives (Bundesarchiv) and utilized. The railroad was responsible for the transportation of inmates to and from concentration camps and these figures from the Russian files are accurately reflected in the Reichsbahn documents.Another avenue for confirmation exists in the wartime radio intercepts which are known to have been made. British wartime intelligence was eavesdropping on the radio traffic as Auschwitz (and other camps) sent regular reports to the relevant government department in Berlin. These messages were either in plain text or a low-level encrypt and consisted of lists of numbers corresponding to the various prisoner categories.The following derives from the prisoner records of Auschwitz camp from May 1940 through December 1944 in the Glücks complete Concentration Camp microfilm records now located in the Russian Central Archives, Central State Archives No. 187603, Rolls 281–286, as follows:Roll 281, 1940: Frames 107–869 Roll 282, 1940–41: Frames 001–875 Roll 283, 1941–42: Frames 001–872 Roll 284 1942–43: Frames 003–862 Roll 285, 1943–44: Frames 019–852 Roll 286, 1945: Frames 001–329.The Russian microfilms cover all of the concentration camp records from 1935–1945 and the Auschwitz records were compiled from these. Note, however, that each months reportage covers all the camps and there is no such thing as an “Auschwitz file” or a “Bergen-Belsen” or “Mauthausen file.” The Auschwitz material is included in, let us say, the July 1942 file along with other camp entries and compilations.

Table 1: Non-Jewish Prisoners Entering Auschwitz

	1940	1941	1942	1943	1944
January	–	1691	843	9474	1767
February	–	1339	1508	4065	1052
March	–	221	1071	15618	573
April	–	4051	1817	7346	5971
May	70	1793	1881	4868	2097
June	1225	731	2583	3368	1412
July	147	1925	3493	4942	1368
August	1156	473	3106	5282	6890
September	1873	785	1628	4531	4604
October	471	7191	2952	8179	674
November	637	1215	2507	3676	1854
December	1190	1217	3172	4961	1251
TOTALS	6,769	22632	26,561	76,310	29,513

Total non-Jews in Auschwitz, 1940–1944: 161,785

Table 2: Jewish Prisoners Entering Auschwitz 1941–1944

	1941	1942	1943	1944
January	–	1166	6076	1445
February	–	6762	2507	1299
March	–	1000	9037	1178
April	–	3004	5054	3175
May	–	9736	2453	18927
June	–	3518	2520	8438
July	171	3419	4201	12924
August	–	5990	13382	12705
September	–	4146	7990	2126
October	–	4742	1624	1177
November	1	–	3921	–
December	6	–	7180	–
TOTALS	178	43,483	65,945	63,394

Total Jews in Auschwitz, 1941–1944: 173,000

Total number of inmates in Auschwitz, 1940–1944: 334,785

Table 3: Total Typhus Deaths in Auschwitz, 1941–1944

	1941	1942	1943	1944
January	–	1776	2123	2801
February	–	1515	2979	1933
March	–	3018	4604	2321
April	–	1392	2835	1771
May	–	2911	2378	981
June	–	3688	2980	1575
July	–	4124	3438	1121
August	–	4968	2633	1847
September	–	1497	2901	3313
October	2128	6092	3549	3095
November	5084	103	4621	927
December	2585	1023	4679	120
TOTALS	9,797	32,107	39,720	21,805

Total deaths by typhus in Auschwitz, 1941–1944: 103,429

Table 4: Jewish Typhus Deaths in Auschwitz, 1942–1944

	1942	1943	1944
January	875	1502	1429
February	906	1729	876
March	1789	3981	1312
April	875	895	632
May	1991	1721	407
June	2406	1990	884
July	3090	2017	455
August	3271	968	1129
September	919	1803	1871
October	4789	2705	1294
November	29	3219	927
December	621	2842	91
TOTALS	21,561	25,372	11,307

Total Jewish deaths by typhus in Auschwitz, 1942–1944: 58,240

Total non-Jewish deaths by typhus in Auschwitz, 1941–1944: 45,189

Table 5: Deaths by natural causes (other than typhus) in Auschwitz, 1940–1944

	1940	1941	1942	1943	1944
January	–	142	120	103	120
February	–	175	77	221	191
March	–	165	42	198	178
April	–	9	39	89	167
May	6	47	23	62	155
June	23	19	21	56	151
July	15	5	16	31	98
August	35	11	5	38	65
September	9	23	19	96	54
October	21	2	25	102	67
November	34	39	49	235	94
December	30	48	61	197	17
TOTALS	173	685	497	1,428	1,357

Deaths by natural causes (other than typhus), 1940–1944: 4,140

Table 6: Deaths by natural causes (other than typhus), Jews, Auschwitz, 1941–1944

	1941	1942	1943	1944
January	–	62	62	98
February	–	39	117	127
March	–	32	120	111
April	–	26	43	140
May	–	11	37	90
June	–	5	41	107
July	–	9	16	49
August	–	1	24	32
September	–	11	61	41
October	–	19	81	39
November	–	37	104	81
December	7	48	130	6
TOTALS	7	300	836	921

Total Jewish deaths by natural causes (other than typhus), 1941–1944: 2,064

Table 7: Transfers from Auschwitz, 1940–1944

	1940	1941	1942	1943	1944
January	–	657	–	–	612
February	–	8	196	–	2060
March	–	–	275	3001	881
April	–	1002	158	1024	2500
May	–	36	423	–	7923
June	–	4	1845	–	9228
July	–	–	753	–	15628
August	–	–	–	3195	8957
September	–	–	–	600	9091
October	11	–	–	4544	33244
November	–	–	–	3500	8309
December	–	–	–	333	1455
TOTALS	11	1,707	3,650	16,197	99,888

Total transferred from Auschwitz, 1940–1944: 121,453

Table 8: Transfers of Jews from Auschwitz, 1941–1944

	1941	1942	1943	1944
January	271	–	–	409
February	–	120	–	1843
March	–	37	1572	410
April	459	30	630	1927
May	17	112	–	7540
June	–	873	–	8109
July	–	120	–	13765
August	–	–	2871	7501
September	–	–	395	8502
October	–	–	3201	28509
November	–	–	3264	7322
December	–	–	173	761
TOTALS	747	1,292	12,106	86,598

Total number of Jews transferred from Auschwitz, 1941–1944: 100,743

Table 9: Administrative Executions at Auschwitz, 1940–1944

1940	1941	1942	1943	1944
Nov 22 40 Poles	Jan 3 1 Pole July 3 80 Poles Aug 1 1 Jew Nov 14 151 Poles Dec 1 1 Pole Dec 20 5 Poles	Jan 24 1 Russian Apr 3 11 Poles May 27 150 Poles May 28 1 Jew June 4 3 Jews June 9 3 Jews June 10 13 Poles June 11 3 Jews June 12 60 Poles, 2 Jews June 13 6 Jews June 15 200 Poles June 16 2 Poles, 2 Jews June 18 8 Jews June 19 50 Poles, 4 Jews June 20 4 Czechs June 22 4 Jews June 23 3 Jews June 25 3 Jews June 26 40 Poles, 1 Jew June 27 4 Jews June 29 2 Poles, 3 Jews July 1 15 Jews July 2 9 Jews July 14 10 Poles, 2 Jews July 16 9 Poles July 20 50 Poles July 23 2 Jews July 29 14 Poles Aug 11 11 Jews Aug 13 1 Pole Aug 18 60 Poles Aug 21 57 Poles Sept 5 1 Jew Sept 25 3 Poles Nov 9 3 Poles Nov 14 1 Pole Nov 17 1 Pole Dec 4 9 Poles, 2 Russians	Jan 6 9 Poles, 5 Jews Jan 14 6 Poles Jan 25 22 Poles Jan 26 7 Poles, 2 Jews Feb 7 2 Poles Feb 9 2 Poles, 1 Jew Feb 13 16 Poles Feb 19 11 Poles, 3 Jews Mar 17 1 Pole Apr 3 26 Poles Apr 13 2 Gypsies May 22 13 Poles, 6 Jews, 5 Gypsies May 31 1 Gypsy June 10 20 Poles June 25 68 Poles June 28 30 Poles July 24 1 Pole July 28 4 Poles Aug 20 38 Poles Sept 4 45 Poles, 8 Russians Sept 21 2 Poles Sept 28 9 Poles, 6 Jews, 12 Gypsies, 1 Czech Oct 11 54 Poles Nov 9 50 Poles	Feb 1 19 Poles, 8 Russians Mar 24 4 Poles, 3 Jews Sept 15 2 Poles
40 Poles	238 Poles, 1 Jew	746 Poles, 90 Jews, 3 Russians, 4 Czechs	436 Poles, 23 Jews, 8 Russians, 1 Czech, 20 Gypsies	25 Poles, 3 Jews, 8 Russians

Total Poles executed: 1,485
Total Jews executed: 117
Total Russians executed: 19
Total Czechs executed: 5
Total Gypsies executed: 20

Total number of inmates executed: 1,646

Table 10: Hungarian Jews sent to, and transferred from, Auschwitz, May–October 1944

	IN	OUT
May	8548	2963
June	3981	5934
July	6543	9630
August	3881	1500
September	163	1300
October	1	200
TOTALS	23,117	21,527

Hungarian Jews remaining in Auschwitz after October 1944: 1,590

Note: The number of Hungarian Jews claimed sent to Auschwitz during May-October 1944 in Lucy Dawidowicz, The War Against the Jews, New York (1975) is 450,000; in Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews, New York (1985) it is 180,000.

Summary of Jewish prisoners in the Auschwitz camp system, 1941–1944

	IN	OUT
Jewish prisoners entering the Auschwitz camp system	173,000
Jewish prisoners who died of typhus		58,240
Jewish prisoners who died of natural causes		2,064
Jewish prisoners executed		117
Jewish prisoners transferred to other camps		100,743
TOTALS	173,000	161,164

Number of Jewish prisoners remaining at end of 1944: 11,836 plus admissions during November and December 1944

These statistics have been collected and compiled by several people, based on microfilm copies of the original records supplied by Germar Rudolf before his arrest in America and extradition to Germany. There he will face trial for challenging the State’s Holocaust dogma. The contributors to this page have agreed that credit should be given to Rudolf who, however, is not responsible for any errors in transcription or interpretation.Figures for some months are unavailable and the summaries given include only the known numbers. In particular, it is not known whether the “ – ” entries represent zero or the statistic is missing.When the SS evacuated the Auschwitz work camp complex on 15 January 1945, they left a large number of prisoners behind. Many of these were too old or too sick to travel and they were left in their barracks, guarded by a Polish militia that had been raised earlier by Hans Frank. With the approach of the Soviet army in early 1945, these Polish guards indiscriminately attacked the barracks, with the prisoners inside, using hand grenades and machine guns.The violent animosity of the Catholic Poles to their huge Jewish community is well known. When the Russians invaded Poland, one of the greatest fears of the Polish leadership and the government was that the 500,000 Jewish residents of Warsaw’s Nalevski district would rise up against them in support of the advancing Bolshevik armies. Many Polish Jews fled after the failure of the Russian attack and a number of those left behind were promptly slaughtered by Poles when the central government collapsed after the German invasion of 1939.Although exact figures of the dead among the remaining Auschwitz inmates in 1945 are not available, several existing Soviet military reports put the death toll between 7,000 and 10,000. Former members of the Polish militia have subsequently claimed that many of the dead were shot down by Russian troops as they attempted to leave the liberated camp. The Russians did not like Jews either, remembering their savagery against them during the salad days of Josef Stalin.The truth of the matter will probably never be known but at least this atrocity cannot be blamed on the Germans, who were hundreds of miles away at the time.

Islamic State is very much Islamic and only traitors and idiots say otherwise

The following is from Mindwizard - writing in the comments section of the Independent in response to yet another ludicrous outburst to the effect the Islam is a religion of peace and anyone who kills others, blows him or herself up, rapes children, imports and sells heroin etc etc etc, isn't a moslem, but a mystical Islamists(!) and shouldn't be classed alongside the 1 or 2 lovely muzzies who get a bad name from the billions of people who use the same label but are something else! The stupid pro-moslem drivel was spouted by the arch-idiot kosher conservative lover of all things moslem, (elected by voting fraud) UK Prime Minister, David Cameron.  Interestingly, when trying to post a direct link to Mindwizard, the link had gone dead (or perhaps been removed)...

by Mindwizard:

Is it me, or is there a very selective historical understanding of Islam as propounded by its scholars and leaders at play here? Back in 1979, Ayatollah Khomeini – a symbol of authority for 200 million Shia Muslims - said:

“Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled or incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of [other] countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world…Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless.”

To the extent that this reflects orthodox thinking for half of the Islamic world, I would say it has something pretty fundamental in common with the ideology of Isis.

Let’s also remember the words of Maududi, the most prominent Sunni Muslim scholar of the 20th Century (and the first recipient of the Saudi Arabian King Faisal International Award for his services to Islam in 1979):

“Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam…the objective of the Islamic ‘ jihād’ is to eliminate the rule of an un-Islamic system and establish in its stead an Islamic system of state rule.”

Surely as unambiguous a definition of Jihad as it is possible to have? And we’re not talking ‘spiritual’ jihad here. Maududi founded Jamaat-e-Islami which funds Hamas and supports Lakshar-e-Taiba, widely held to be responsible for the Mumbai attacks.. 

Was he, too, perverting a great religion? If so, we should challenge the Saudi rulers, who clearly revered Maududi. If not, we can hardly insist that the ISIS project is un-Islamic.

Until we recognise that establishing a Caliphate is attractive in mainstream Islamic thought, we will never understand why 32 percent of Muslim students polled in the UK in 2008 said killing in the name of religion was justified and a third supported a worldwide Islamic caliphate. Until we acknowledge that the appeal of violent Jihad goes way beyond some tiny group of extremists, we will never understand why the 2007 ICM poll showed that 20 percent of British Muslims sympathised with the 7/7 bombers. How precisely are we meant to counter the so-called ‘extremist narrative’ attracting young Muslims to join Isis if we sacrifice honest discussion for a politically-correct fudge of the truth.

Just an added note of interest: I earlier posted a shorter version of the above on The Guardian website. They removed it for an unspecified breach of 'Community Standards' - although I could not for the life of me work out which one they chose to apply. After all, the words I quoted are not mine but those of prominent Muslim scholars. The poll results of Muslim student opinion and post 7/7 Muslim sentiment were widely reported in The Guardian itself. So why the need to censor? A lack of intellectual courage, perhaps. A pusillanimous fear of mentioning Saudi Arabia's complicity with Islamist ideology (however grounded in fact that observation might be), almost certainly. A desire to silence a clearly articulated but unpopular opinion, possibly.

Sodomite Pride: Why are we forced to celebrate male perverts obsessions with men's bottoms (not to mention minge-eating lezzers)?

Today is pride day - rainbow flags are flying from public buildings, social media propaganda outlets like facebook are awash with the same.  In cities across the decadent west, sodomites and their female counterparts are dressed in their best bedroom gear, practically having sex in the streets as idiot liberals and their poor confused children cheer on a display of sordid sexual debauchery.  The police (those who aren't mincing about in bondage wear and pink færy costumes and themselves participating in the pride marches) are failing to uphold their legal requirement to protect the innocence of children, not arresting a single individual for public obscenity. 

One has to question what the whole pride issue is?  Homosexuality is very simply the fulfillment of a desire by people who have failed to leave adolescence and become healthy adults, to put their todgers into each others bottoms.  So gay pride must therefore be an overwhelming desire to shout to everyone within earshot (whether we like to hear or not), that these individuals take great pride in touching each others bums with their hands, penes, a variety of objects and of course tongues - taking great pride in the ability to swallow fæces and semen whilst dressed as one of the Village People or as Danny Le Rue (making pride in the 1970s part of their unwholesome perversion!)

Sexuality differs from person to person.  What one person considers normal, another may not.  What consenting adults get up to behind closed doors is their own business and no-one elses.  Taking to the streets in sexual costumes waving flags declaring that they are proud of their bedroom athletics makes their sexuality the business of everyone.  This invites interest in the over-representation of homosexuals in the ranks of the criminal pædophile fraternity.  It isn't just moslems who like to rape children.  Remove moslems from the statistics and the percentage of homosexual pædophiles rockets to the point where heterosexual pædophilia looks like a statistical anomaly.  Why aren't the pride marchers carrying banners of destroyed children, if being gay is something we should all admire?  If homosexuals were as 'good as you' and me (as they claim), then the number of pædophiles amongst them would be such as to make those who prey on children a very small minority.  Sadly, that isn't the case.

Homosexuals do not restrict their antics to the bedroom.  They have their own pubs and nightclubs and entire areas of various cities (including much of Brighton and Canal Street in Manchester).  That in itself isn't a problem really, and could be seen as a positive thing as it allows for people who wish to sodomise one another to meet amongst people who share this desire.  Creating a parallel society with no links to the majority population cannot be anything but a good thing.  The more separate they make themselves, the better.  Unfortunately, they do not want to be separate.  Gay pride is a euphemism; what they really mean is gay power.  The pride marchers are gay supremacists and they will stop at nothing to queer the nation to give them total control.

What is a problem with the gay agenda is that they operate in a manner which would make the Freemasons blush - when homosexuals gain positions of authority in the workplace, government or elsewhere, they use their positions to discriminate against people who do not share their proclivities.  Whereas heterosexuals don't generally give a damn about the sexual activities of others, homosexual managers make a point of demanding that only their fellow bottom-lickers are promoted.  When they achieve positions in government, they use their influence to push for legislation which discriminates against excellence and in favour of perversion.  A man can apply for a job he is woefully unqualified for and get it simply because he likes to suck cock.  Gay pride must surely include an element of arrogant pride in the stupidity of ordinary people in allowing for legislation to be enacted which denies them advancement in work unless they indulge in turd burglary and poo-eating.

Not content with having Civil Partnerships created to give homosexuals legal protection in old age, allowing for one 'partner' of a couple to gain the equivalent of Widow's Benefit in the advent of the other dying (forgetting that homosexuals are notoriously promiscuous and thus unlikely to form lasting relationships), gay power activists have taken it upon themselves to destroy the institution of marriage, which exists to protect children and families.  There is no need for gay marriage; civil partnerships are 'marriage' in all but name.  The fact that the name of marriage itself has been usurped is an act of political terrorism, with no benefit to the homosexuals, other than to make a mockery of real marriage.

In schools, sodomites have pushed through sex education classes which encourage underage boys to sodomise one another and to fall for the lure of predatory homosexual pædophiles.  The natural idea of one man and one woman marrying, living together monogamously, and raising children to do likewise, has been steamrollered to make way for the gay lifestyle of anonymous casual sex, with the accompanying increase on sexually transmitted diseases, depression, mental illness, inability to form stable relationships, experiments with race-mixing, fatherless bastard children and many other ills which are wrecking society.  Gay pride is a pride in creating misery for the rest of us and imposing a lifestyle which was previously (and correctly) identified as dysfunctional and borne of mental illness, upon society as a whole.

The rainbow flag should not be flown over public buildings.  To do so is to afford it recognition as one would a sovereign nation.  The rainbow flag is not a symbol of pride, but of supremacist gay power.  Perhaps though, this may be a good thing.  The more homosexuals insult us by demanding that we are denied employment so that they can get cushy jobs which they are not qualified enough to be entitled to; the more they use their control over government to subvert our laws, corrupt our children and make their dominance impossible to ignore, the more we will be able to identify them as a separate sovereign entity.  Perhaps a solution to the homosexual problem would be to accept their rainbow flag as a political symbol, and to embrace their separatism.  

Greece is financially ruined thanks to the bankers (including a good many gay power sorts).  Perhaps the pink mafia could use their financial clout to buy a couple of Greek islands, returning the lesbians to the region from which their name comes and taking the sodomites with them - obviously to a different island, considering how genuinely sexist they are (it is well known that gays hate women and lesbians hate men).  

Imagine a world in which all the sodomites have somewhere to live, to bum each other in the streets if they wish to, and where they can harm no one who doesn't enjoy the dubious pleasures of buggery?  Imagine a world where the lettuce-lickers of Hebden Bridge can join with their fellows from across the globe to wear their purple Doc Martens, shave their heads, strap on fake knobs and crack on with their perversions? A couple of decadent islands full of writhing sex addicts, gobbling down fæces and dressing as prostitutes of the opposite sex, would be a small price to pay for liberating the rest of the world from individuals whose lust for perversion comes second only to their lust for power.  Let their people go - please let their people go!

England is NOT Pakistan - honestly! Although you would be forgiven for thinking it is

England is a fiefdom of the global zionist banking cabal.  Ruled from the City of London, England is officially governed by the UK Parliament at Westminster, meaning for those who understand the semi-federal structure of the UK, that whereas  Scotland has its own complete Parliament, Wales, Northern Ireland and London each have an Assembly, England has no representation of its own and is a vassal state controlled by imperialistic financial parasites.  But be that as it may, this rant is not about the outrageous lack of democracy in England, rather about the lack of Englishness in England!

London and the major cities have been thoroughly colonised by Third World invaders at the behest of Jewish oligarchs.  The nature-hating non-Europeans have congregated in the urban centres bringing with them their culture-enriching diversity, including such marvels as ritual animal cruelty (halal and shechita), child rape (so-called grooming), heroin and crack dealing, prostitution and many many more marvels which a once civilised people now embrace as the new barbarity and criminality sweeps across our land.

Anyone listening to the news over the last week, would be forgiven for wondering if the country known as England really is but another part of Pakistan.  BBC Radio Sheffield aired a propaganda piece on behalf of the Pakistani community of Rotherham in which Rotherham Council was ridiculed for daring to suggest that Taxis in the metropolitan area should be equipped with CCTV in order to deter drivers from using their vehicles to ferry young white girls to take-aways to there be raped.  The BBC very carefully forgot to mention that all the taxi drivers involved and all the take-away staff involved in the rape trade in Rotherham (and they could for that matter have added in Halifax, Huddersfield, Bradford, Leeds, Rochdale, Oldham, Manchester, Newcastle, Luton, Slough, High Wycombe, Birmingham, Leicester, Bristol etc etc etc (in fact EVERY town and city in England (well, the entire UK) with a Pakistani population), are Pakistanis with UK documents (well, that is those who have bothered to get legal status that is!)

The BBC not only tried to hide the Pakistani origin of the rapist taxi drivers, rapist kebab shop staff and rapist mosque enthusiasts, they got experts in to state that the girls were liars and most likely motivated by racism.  Funnily the 'experts' were themselves Pakistanis and worked in the taxi trade and quite possibly involved in the mass rape of indigenous children - so obviously they were clearly impartial and trustworthy!  The programme went on to moan that it was only a small handful of criminals who had given the Pakistani community a bad name and that if the CCTV could be turned off when people weren't taking fares, then it would simply be a tax to penalise the generally good hard-working invader population.  To finish the propaganda piece, the BBC had a deranged woman come on to praise the taxi drivers for being friendly and respectful.  I didn't know whether to laugh at the lies coming from my radio or drive to Sheffield to catch the actress with her pocketful of shekels leaving the BBC propaganda ministry, to gain evidence of the lie factory - but considering that the moronic majority have already forgotten that over one million children have been raped by Pakistanis in England, what would have been the point?

The next bit of 'news' came from Dewsbury - slightly north of Rotherham, but still in the old West Riding of Yorkshire.  A Pakistani who was brought up there by the usual 'moderate' moslem community had somehow been corrupted by internet 'groomers' (using a term the BBC love to bandy about but in this case to make it appear that the poor little love was a victim just like the children raped by his people (and probably by him personally in some cases).  The poor little mite had been turned to ISIS (which we all know isn't really Islam even though it looks, sounds and stinks just like the bullshit of the Mohammedan cultists) and is now the youngest ever suicide bomber to have come from England.  The murdering scum did not come from England - he was a Pakistani who happened to be a part of the invasion force which occupies swathes of our territory; he was a moslem no matter what the liars in mosques and government say; he was no victim - the people he murdered were though!

The Rotherham story was quickly joined in the memory hole by the story of the Dewsbury-infesting murderer, as the next bit of news was that a family of Pakistanis had left Bradford (a spit away from Dewsbury in an adjoining council area heading north) to go become murderers and prostitutes for ISIS - you know, that un-Islamic group that moslems across the UK condemn publicly but support behind closed doors and in the open when in sufficient numbers.  The Pakistanis this time were three slags and nine children, who according to the BBC propaganda machine (this time BBC Radio Leeds) were from loving families and whose departure has been a deep shock to the husbands/fathers (/cousins etc!).  The pathetic BBC interviewed the men folk who spoke obviously from a script of 'love' and understanding, stating that the families would be welcome and that they could continue as before.  This was just another episode in the ongoing saga of women and children going to fight for Islam in ISISland - remember the slags who left Dewsbury in almost identical circumstances?  It was only in April, yet of course like all things Pakistani, that has been quietly pushed out of the public arena.  How embarrassing it must be for the BBC and government that no sooner have they hushed up one act of Pakistani lunacy than more Pakistanis provide a new one.

Pakistanis do not have the emotion of love, any more than they have that of tolerance or empathy - these are European traits which the BBC is trying to attribute to a people who do not have them at all in a clear case of deluded anthropomorphism.  The children and their mothers will doubtless be willing participants in the sex jihad for the barbarian fighters of the Islamic State, and may yet provide a new record for the youngest terrorist to have at some point lived on British soil.  Its a pity that the whole family didn't go to Syria, but then someone has to stay behind to get UK Welfare payments to channel to them over there!

The next bit of 'news' was that some madwoman of African descent who is

forever prattling on about 'racism' and crying that she is being held back by evil white racists, made a trip to the old East End of London to encourage 'British' girls to become leaders of the future.  The deranged woman was Michelle Obama whose husband is the directly elected President of the USA - the most powerful position that the people of that country could bestow upon anyone, but still she thinks that she is held back because of  her skin colour!  Obviously a woman of low IQ and paranoid delusions which would make her a suitable case for committing for treatment in a lunatic asylum, Obama met with girls in an area where not long ago one would have found proud Cockneys of the Pearly Kings and Queens variety.  Not so now though - these 'British' children were hijab and burka-clad Pakistanis.  No doubt Obama will be very proud when they go on to be leaders in providing excuses to their rapist husbands and fathers, or perhaps toddle off to join IS and blow people up (when they're too old to provide other work to the honourable terrorists!)

Pakistanis rape our children at will and are protected by the Law from criticism.  They routinely head off to Syria and Turkey to get terrorist training; they are let back into the UK to wait until they are activated to wage war on us.  They control the heroin and crack trade, with the associated prostitution trade in human flesh.  They steal from taxpayers by having mosques built at our expense and their lives paid for by our Welfare system, while we have to rely on soup kitchens and food parcels.  Those that bother to get legal work take the best paying jobs, thus denying us all but the most menial labour - the liberal defamers still spout the racist slander that we are too lazy to do hard work and as a result we need immigration to do the jobs we won't!  This is laughable.  Pakistanis subvert our laws, making polygamy, incest, spousal abuse, honour killings (murder), animal abuse, theft, anti-White racism, Islamic bigotry and many other evils the norm across the occupied territories of the UK.  We who speak out are arrested.  Moslem Blasphemy Laws are unofficially in place in the UK, with people being arrested for reading the koran in public - let alone burning that hate-filled tome of violence and supremacist drivel.

England is NOT Pakistan, but it is fast becoming so.  Unless every single Pakistani is removed from our shores our future is one of servitude and ultimately genocide.  And worst of all, liberals of our own kind are the ones pushing this grim possibility into a reality.  Ironically, right now in the Pakistani Occupied Territories of Yorkshire, with Pakistanis off the streets and away from the shops due to their stupid festival of ramadan (where they eat like pigs from dusk until just before dawn and then arrogantly expect us to be impressed with their abstinence from food for a few hours, which they claim lets them know how people who are poor and hungry feel (such as many English who do without very often, but do not have the binges and actually do experience hunger)), England feels English.  Our country is a great place with lovely people - it is only when the Pakistanis are behind closed doors that we can appreciate how life would be without these parasites in our midst.  Even then the Jewish supermarkets (Tesco, Sainsburys etc) offend us with posters in arabic glorifying the religion of the child rapist/murderer mohammed.  There is another way, and we'd better get actively involved in FIGHTING for it, or our homeland will become just another moslem toilet, with us used as the toilet paper.

The UK Referendum on an EU exit - Rigged against Freedom

The Prime Minister, David Cameron, has hinted that 16 and 17 year olds will be allowed to vote in the freedom referendum.  Why?  Because, he correctly states, the coming referendum on the UK's membership of the EU is one which will impact upon the future of the country.  If the voters say No to Freedom and Yes to EU Slavery (just as the rigged vote in Scotland gave the impression that the people had willingly opted for keeping on the shackles of London), then life will become ever worse and the peoples of the British Isles will have signed the death warrant of their childrens' future.  This is what is very likely to occur.

The assertion that people of 16 and 17 should have a vote because their futures are at stake, seems reasonable enough, but it is looking at reality from the wrong direction.  Most teenagers have never had the experience of seeing prices soar because of VAT.  Most teenagers have not had the opportunity to escape the pro-EU brain-washing

of the misnamed education system.  As a result, most teenagers will vote No to Freedom because they will have no comprehension of exactly what the EU is, and will see it as a cosy club of nations, membership of which is great for partying on far off beaches, and anyway it wouldn't be 'nice' to not be in it (to use an emotional level of debate which those without life experience will not have seen for the fraud it is.)

The future of the country IS at stake.  It is those who are responsible for future generations who should have a say - and only those people.  In the referendum, people from pakistan who happen to have UK passports will be allowed to vote, and they will vote to stay in the EU because they have no idea of what it is to be English, Scottish, Irish or Welsh; to them the EU is simply the geographical area of Europe and a place for the teaming millions of Asia to swarm into.  The UK being free of the EU would hamper the ability of legions of non-Europeans to flood into the UK through the ridiculous fact that entry into one EU country means entry into all.  So, the immigrant population will vote No to Freedom and Yes to open borders so that their parasitic relatives can flood in and devour our land like locusts with the ability to swarm onto another EU country should pickings here become less good than at present.  No-one who is not indigenous should have any right to vote in our country at all - or be in it for that matter!

The future of our country should be decided by people with a stake in the future; people with children.  People who do not have children have no right in deciding what will happen to the country when they have gone.  If they leave no children, then they are not a part of the future and have no right to have a say in anything which comes after them.  

Childless adults can only be motivated by selfish interests - mostly how they will be financially effected by the referendum result.  Childless teenagers are too inexperienced

to have a say, and are only being given a vote because the Government knows that they have been indoctrinated into loving the EU Big Brother and can be relied upon to vote to keep us in the prison state.  Foreigners shouldn't even be here, let alone allowed any say in how we operate in our own country.  Because they have most to gain by our freedom, they too can be relied upon to vote to destroy us - which is what they are doing in many ways by their presence anyway.

The EU Referendum is rigged before it has even begun.  The Government will pump vast amounts of our money into propaganda to make gullible people think that the EU is a good idea for the ordinary people, and not just a club for the bankers and global financial mafia.  Cameron has already lied through his teeth, stating that no-one in the Government will be allowed to campaign for Freedom, then when caught out acting like a dictator, coming up with a pathetic story that he really meant to say that no one in the Government must be allowed to oppose the Referendum process and the EU renegotiation - which is something only people opposed to leaving the prison would do anyway (notably the Liberals and the SNP).

When the Referendum is done, the people will have lost and the UK will be forever ensnared by the EU.  Having given our consent (with the help of selfish money-grubbers, hostile foreigners and naive children), the EU will accelerate its destruction of sovereignty, push through plans to force all member states to accept millions of Asian and African 'refugees' (financial parasites with hostile religions and a pathological hatred of all that is European).  Should the people happen to vote Yes for Freedom and No to Tyranny, the votes will be miscounted/lost and the result will go in the favour of the despots.  The latest Tory victory is proof that democracy doesn't exist in the UK, as the present Government only achieved power by outright electoral fraud,  They will do whatever it takes to keep us in the prison state and then claim it is our choice and use that as a mandate to destroy us.  Don't get excited at the fact that we are getting a referendum - we have already lost.