Thursday, 16 July 2015

Jews Executed in Auschwitz: 117, not 6 million!

As a poor old man has been given a life sentence in Germany for simply being a Book Keeper in Auschwitz (the man who recorded the personal belongings of the internees in order to ensure they got everything back upon their release), it is timely to look at the real death toll, not the fantasy propaganda figures.  In all, 60,441 Jews died in Auschwitz, 60,304 of natural causes (including 58,240 of typhus caused by Jewish-controlled 'allied' terrorist bombers) and a mere 117 were executed.  The entire death toll was less than the number of civilians massacred in Dresden and not much more than those slaughtered in the Blitz as a result of being deliberately sacrificed in a war which no-one wanted (except the Jews), by the Jewish controlled government of the UK.  Contrary to the whining Jewish lies of 6 million being done to death due to racism (a nonsense label used to silence thought), 117 Jews were deliberately killed, and these were people whose criminality necessitated the death penalty.  Think of the miscarriage of justice for those murdered at Nuremberg and in show trials ever since.  Think of how we as a race have been libeled by our enemies and have cowered before the racist stick which labels us as genocidal maniacs - whilst we are being subjected to genuine genocide at the hands of the same Jews who dare to call us barbarians.


They said that 6 million Jews were murdered by Germany, of whom 4 million died in Auschwitz. this was revised down (by the Jews) to 1.5 million (yet the total figure did not drop to 3.5 million, but remained 6 million.  Now we can see that 0.06 million died in Auschwitz, of whom only 117 were 'murdered', but the figure doesn't drop to 2 million, it remains 6 million!  The Holocaust fable is a vile and vicious piece of racist propaganda which doesn't stand up to scrutiny.  So weak is the færytale that it has to be protected by law, with people going to prison for questioning it, and as we have seen this week, elderly Germans given what amounts to life sentences for being anywhere near the camp. Oskar Groening killed no-one and should have been thanked by the Jews for carefully recording their belongings, but instead he will die in prison, Such is the ungrateful and hateful nature of the Jewish victors.  Interestingly, the Jewish prosecutors danced between saying that 1 million Jews dies in Auschwitz and the lower figure of 300,000.  The lie is so obvious that it is embarrassing, yet people still lose their freedom and the Jews still retain their power as a result of it (and don't forget Palestine either!)

Source for the following: http://www.heretical.com/miscella/rudolf.html

Official German Record of Prisoners in Auschwitz Concentration Camp May 1940 through December 1944






These statistics concerning prisoners in Auschwitz camp purport to be taken directly from Soviet archive material, now available on microfilm from the former Soviet Central Archives. Also, a good deal of corroborative material from the German Archives concerning the German State Railways has been located in the German State Archives (Bundesarchiv) and utilized. The railroad was responsible for the transportation of inmates to and from concentration camps and these figures from the Russian files are accurately reflected in the Reichsbahn documents.Another avenue for confirmation exists in the wartime radio intercepts which are known to have been made. British wartime intelligence was eavesdropping on the radio traffic as Auschwitz (and other camps) sent regular reports to the relevant government department in Berlin. These messages were either in plain text or a low-level encrypt and consisted of lists of numbers corresponding to the various prisoner categories.The following derives from the prisoner records of Auschwitz camp from May 1940 through December 1944 in the Glücks complete Concentration Camp microfilm records now located in the Russian Central Archives, Central State Archives No. 187603, Rolls 281–286, as follows:Roll 281, 1940: Frames 107–869
Roll 282, 1940–41: Frames 001–875
Roll 283, 1941–42: Frames 001–872
Roll 284 1942–43: Frames 003–862
Roll 285, 1943–44: Frames 019–852
Roll 286, 1945: Frames 001–329.The Russian microfilms cover all of the concentration camp records from 1935–1945 and the Auschwitz records were compiled from these. Note, however, that each months reportage covers all the camps and there is no such thing as an “Auschwitz file” or a “Bergen-Belsen” or “Mauthausen file.” The Auschwitz material is included in, let us say, the July 1942 file along with other camp entries and compilations.

Table 1: Non-Jewish Prisoners Entering Auschwitz

1940 1941 1942 1943 1944

January 1691 843 9474 1767
February 1339 1508 4065 1052
March 221 1071 15618 573
April 4051 1817 7346 5971
May 70 1793 1881 4868 2097
June 1225 731 2583 3368 1412
July 147 1925 3493 4942 1368
August 1156 473 3106 5282 6890
September 1873 785 1628 4531 4604
October 471 7191 2952 8179 674
November 637 1215 2507 3676 1854
December 1190 1217 3172 4961 1251

TOTALS 6,769     22632     26,561     76,310     29,513    

Total non-Jews in Auschwitz, 1940–1944: 161,785


Table 2: Jewish Prisoners Entering Auschwitz 1941–1944

1941 1942 1943 1944

January 1166 6076 1445
February 6762 2507 1299
March 1000 9037 1178
April 3004 5054 3175
May 9736 2453 18927
June 3518 2520 8438
July 171 3419 4201 12924
August 5990 13382 12705
September 4146 7990 2126
October 4742 1624 1177
November 1 3921
December 6 7180

TOTALS 178     43,483     65,945     63,394    

Total Jews in Auschwitz, 1941–1944: 173,000

Total number of inmates in Auschwitz, 1940–1944: 334,785


Table 3: Total Typhus Deaths in Auschwitz, 1941–1944

1941 1942 1943 1944

January 1776 2123 2801
February 1515 2979 1933
March 3018 4604 2321
April 1392 2835 1771
May 2911 2378 981
June 3688 2980 1575
July 4124 3438 1121
August 4968 2633 1847
September 1497 2901 3313
October 2128 6092 3549 3095
November 5084 103 4621 927
December 2585 1023 4679 120

TOTALS 9,797     32,107     39,720     21,805    

Total deaths by typhus in Auschwitz, 1941–1944: 103,429


Table 4: Jewish Typhus Deaths in Auschwitz, 1942–1944

1942 1943 1944

January 875 1502 1429
February 906 1729 876
March 1789 3981 1312
April 875 895 632
May 1991 1721 407
June 2406 1990 884
July 3090 2017 455
August 3271 968 1129
September 919 1803 1871
October 4789 2705 1294
November 29 3219 927
December 621 2842 91

TOTALS 21,561     25,372     11,307    

Total Jewish deaths by typhus in Auschwitz, 1942–1944: 58,240

Total non-Jewish deaths by typhus in Auschwitz, 1941–1944: 45,189


Table 5: Deaths by natural causes (other than typhus) in Auschwitz, 1940–1944

1940 1941 1942 1943 1944

January 142 120 103 120
February 175 77 221 191
March 165 42 198 178
April 9 39 89 167
May 6 47 23 62 155
June 23 19 21 56 151
July 15 5 16 31 98
August 35 11 5 38 65
September 9 23 19 96 54
October 21 2 25 102 67
November 34 39 49 235 94
December 30 48 61 197 17

TOTALS 173     685     497     1,428     1,357    

Deaths by natural causes (other than typhus), 1940–1944: 4,140


Table 6: Deaths by natural causes (other than typhus), Jews, Auschwitz, 1941–1944

1941 1942 1943 1944

January 62 62 98
February 39 117 127
March 32 120 111
April 26 43 140
May 11 37 90
June 5 41 107
July 9 16 49
August 1 24 32
September 11 61 41
October 19 81 39
November 37 104 81
December 7 48 130 6

TOTALS 7     300     836     921    

Total Jewish deaths by natural causes (other than typhus), 1941–1944: 2,064


Table 7: Transfers from Auschwitz, 1940–1944

1940 1941 1942 1943 1944

January 657 612
February 8 196 2060
March 275 3001 881
April 1002 158 1024 2500
May 36 423 7923
June 4 1845 9228
July 753 15628
August 3195 8957
September 600 9091
October 11 4544 33244
November 3500 8309
December 333 1455

TOTALS 11     1,707     3,650     16,197     99,888    

Total transferred from Auschwitz, 1940–1944: 121,453


Table 8: Transfers of Jews from Auschwitz, 1941–1944

1941 1942 1943 1944

January 271 409
February 120 1843
March 37 1572 410
April 459 30 630 1927
May 17 112 7540
June 873 8109
July 120 13765
August 2871 7501
September 395 8502
October 3201 28509
November 3264 7322
December 173 761

TOTALS 747     1,292     12,106     86,598    

Total number of Jews transferred from Auschwitz, 1941–1944: 100,743


Table 9: Administrative Executions at Auschwitz, 1940–1944

1940 1941 1942 1943 1944

Nov 22 40 Poles Jan 3 1 Pole
July 3 80 Poles
Aug 1 1 Jew
Nov 14 151 Poles
Dec 1 1 Pole
Dec 20 5 Poles
Jan 24 1 Russian
Apr 3 11 Poles
May 27 150 Poles
May 28 1 Jew
June 4 3 Jews
June 9 3 Jews
June 10 13 Poles
June 11 3 Jews
June 12 60 Poles, 2 Jews
June 13 6 Jews
June 15 200 Poles
June 16 2 Poles, 2 Jews
June 18 8 Jews
June 19 50 Poles, 4 Jews
June 20 4 Czechs
June 22 4 Jews
June 23 3 Jews
June 25 3 Jews
June 26 40 Poles, 1 Jew
June 27 4 Jews
June 29 2 Poles, 3 Jews
July 1 15 Jews
July 2 9 Jews
July 14 10 Poles, 2 Jews
July 16 9 Poles
July 20 50 Poles
July 23 2 Jews
July 29 14 Poles
Aug 11 11 Jews
Aug 13 1 Pole
Aug 18 60 Poles
Aug 21 57 Poles
Sept 5 1 Jew
Sept 25 3 Poles
Nov 9 3 Poles
Nov 14 1 Pole
Nov 17 1 Pole
Dec 4 9 Poles, 2 Russians
Jan 6 9 Poles, 5 Jews
Jan 14 6 Poles
Jan 25 22 Poles
Jan 26 7 Poles, 2 Jews
Feb 7 2 Poles
Feb 9 2 Poles, 1 Jew
Feb 13 16 Poles
Feb 19 11 Poles, 3 Jews
Mar 17 1 Pole
Apr 3 26 Poles
Apr 13 2 Gypsies
May 22 13 Poles, 6 Jews, 5 Gypsies
May 31 1 Gypsy
June 10 20 Poles
June 25 68 Poles
June 28 30 Poles
July 24 1 Pole
July 28 4 Poles
Aug 20 38 Poles
Sept 4 45 Poles, 8 Russians
Sept 21 2 Poles
Sept 28 9 Poles, 6 Jews, 12 Gypsies, 1 Czech
Oct 11 54 Poles
Nov 9 50 Poles
Feb 1 19 Poles, 8 Russians
Mar 24 4 Poles, 3 Jews
Sept 15 2 Poles

40 Poles 238 Poles, 1 Jew 746 Poles, 90 Jews, 3 Russians, 4 Czechs 436 Poles, 23 Jews, 8 Russians, 1 Czech, 20 Gypsies 25 Poles, 3 Jews, 8 Russians

Total Poles executed: 1,485
Total Jews executed: 117
Total Russians executed: 19
Total Czechs executed: 5
Total Gypsies executed: 20

Total number of inmates executed: 1,646


Table 10: Hungarian Jews sent to, and transferred from, Auschwitz, May–October 1944

IN OUT

May 8548 2963
June 3981 5934
July 6543 9630
August 3881 1500
September 163 1300
October 1 200

TOTALS 23,117     21,527    

Hungarian Jews remaining in Auschwitz after October 1944: 1,590

Note: The number of Hungarian Jews claimed sent to Auschwitz during May-October 1944 in Lucy Dawidowicz, The War Against the Jews, New York (1975) is 450,000; in Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews, New York (1985) it is 180,000.

Summary of Jewish prisoners in the Auschwitz camp system, 1941–1944


IN OUT

Jewish prisoners entering the Auschwitz camp system 173,000
Jewish prisoners who died of typhus 58,240
Jewish prisoners who died of natural causes 2,064
Jewish prisoners executed 117
Jewish prisoners transferred to other camps 100,743

TOTALS 173,000  161,164 

Number of Jewish prisoners remaining at end of 1944: 11,836 plus admissions during November and December 1944


These statistics have been collected and compiled by several people, based on microfilm copies of the original records supplied by Germar Rudolf before his arrest in America and extradition to Germany. There he will face trial for challenging the State’s Holocaust dogma. The contributors to this page have agreed that credit should be given to Rudolf who, however, is not responsible for any errors in transcription or interpretation.Figures for some months are unavailable and the summaries given include only the known numbers. In particular, it is not known whether the “ – ” entries represent zero or the statistic is missing.When the SS evacuated the Auschwitz work camp complex on 15 January 1945, they left a large number of prisoners behind. Many of these were too old or too sick to travel and they were left in their barracks, guarded by a Polish militia that had been raised earlier by Hans Frank. With the approach of the Soviet army in early 1945, these Polish guards indiscriminately attacked the barracks, with the prisoners inside, using hand grenades and machine guns.The violent animosity of the Catholic Poles to their huge Jewish community is well known. When the Russians invaded Poland, one of the greatest fears of the Polish leadership and the government was that the 500,000 Jewish residents of Warsaw’s Nalevski district would rise up against them in support of the advancing Bolshevik armies. Many Polish Jews fled after the failure of the Russian attack and a number of those left behind were promptly slaughtered by Poles when the central government collapsed after the German invasion of 1939.Although exact figures of the dead among the remaining Auschwitz inmates in 1945 are not available, several existing Soviet military reports put the death toll between 7,000 and 10,000. Former members of the Polish militia have subsequently claimed that many of the dead were shot down by Russian troops as they attempted to leave the liberated camp. The Russians did not like Jews either, remembering their savagery against them during the salad days of Josef Stalin.The truth of the matter will probably never be known but at least this atrocity cannot be blamed on the Germans, who were hundreds of miles away at the time.




Tuesday, 30 June 2015

Islamic State is very much Islamic and only traitors and idiots say otherwise

The following is from Mindwizard - writing in the comments section of the Independent in response to yet another ludicrous outburst to the effect the Islam is a religion of peace and anyone who kills others, blows him or herself up, rapes children, imports and sells heroin etc etc etc, isn't a moslem, but a mystical Islamists(!) and shouldn't be classed alongside the 1 or 2 lovely muzzies who get a bad name from the billions of people who use the same label but are something else! The stupid pro-moslem drivel was spouted by the arch-idiot kosher conservative lover of all things moslem, (elected by voting fraud) UK Prime Minister, David Cameron.  Interestingly, when trying to post a direct link to Mindwizard, the link had gone dead (or perhaps been removed)...

by Mindwizard:

Is it me, or is there a very selective historical understanding of Islam as propounded by its scholars and leaders at play here? Back in 1979, Ayatollah Khomeini – a symbol of authority for 200 million Shia Muslims - said:

“Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled or incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of [other] countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world…Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless.”

To the extent that this reflects orthodox thinking for half of the Islamic world, I would say it has something pretty fundamental in common with the ideology of Isis.

Let’s also remember the words of Maududi, the most prominent Sunni Muslim scholar of the 20th Century (and the first recipient of the Saudi Arabian King Faisal International Award for his services to Islam in 1979):

“Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam…the objective of the Islamic ‘ jihād’ is to eliminate the rule of an un-Islamic system and establish in its stead an Islamic system of state rule.”

Surely as unambiguous a definition of Jihad as it is possible to have? And we’re not talking ‘spiritual’ jihad here. Maududi founded Jamaat-e-Islami which funds Hamas and supports Lakshar-e-Taiba, widely held to be responsible for the Mumbai attacks.. 

Was he, too, perverting a great religion? If so, we should challenge the Saudi rulers, who clearly revered Maududi. If not, we can hardly insist that the ISIS project is un-Islamic.

Until we recognise that establishing a Caliphate is attractive in mainstream Islamic thought, we will never understand why 32 percent of Muslim students polled in the UK in 2008 said killing in the name of religion was justified and a third supported a worldwide Islamic caliphate. Until we acknowledge that the appeal of violent Jihad goes way beyond some tiny group of extremists, we will never understand why the 2007 ICM poll showed that 20 percent of British Muslims sympathised with the 7/7 bombers. How precisely are we meant to counter the so-called ‘extremist narrative’ attracting young Muslims to join Isis if we sacrifice honest discussion for a politically-correct fudge of the truth.

Just an added note of interest: I earlier posted a shorter version of the above on The Guardian website. They removed it for an unspecified breach of 'Community Standards' - although I could not for the life of me work out which one they chose to apply. After all, the words I quoted are not mine but those of prominent Muslim scholars. The poll results of Muslim student opinion and post 7/7 Muslim sentiment were widely reported in The Guardian itself. So why the need to censor? A lack of intellectual courage, perhaps. A pusillanimous fear of mentioning Saudi Arabia's complicity with Islamist ideology (however grounded in fact that observation might be), almost certainly. A desire to silence a clearly articulated but unpopular opinion, possibly.

Saturday, 27 June 2015

Sodomite Pride: Why are we forced to celebrate male perverts obsessions with men's bottoms (not to mention minge-eating lezzers)?

Today is pride day - rainbow flags are flying from public buildings, social media propaganda outlets like facebook are awash with the same.  In cities across the decadent west, sodomites and their female counterparts are dressed in their best bedroom gear, practically having sex in the streets as idiot liberals and their poor confused children cheer on a display of sordid sexual debauchery.  The police (those who aren't mincing about in bondage wear and pink færy costumes and themselves participating in the pride marches) are failing to uphold their legal requirement to protect the innocence of children, not arresting a single individual for public obscenity. 

One has to question what the whole pride issue is?  Homosexuality is very simply the fulfillment of a desire by people who have failed to leave adolescence and become healthy adults, to put their todgers into each others bottoms.  So gay pride must therefore be an overwhelming desire to shout to everyone within earshot (whether we like to hear or not), that these individuals take great pride in touching each others bums with their hands, penes, a variety of objects and of course tongues - taking great pride in the ability to swallow fæces and semen whilst dressed as one of the Village People or as Danny Le Rue (making pride in the 1970s part of their unwholesome perversion!)

Sexuality differs from person to person.  What one person considers normal, another may not.  What consenting adults get up to behind closed doors is their own business and no-one elses.  Taking to the streets in sexual costumes waving flags declaring that they are proud of their bedroom athletics makes their sexuality the business of everyone.  This invites interest in the over-representation of homosexuals in the ranks of the criminal pædophile fraternity.  It isn't just moslems who like to rape children.  Remove moslems from the statistics and the percentage of homosexual pædophiles rockets to the point where heterosexual pædophilia looks like a statistical anomaly.  Why aren't the pride marchers carrying banners of destroyed children, if being gay is something we should all admire?  If homosexuals were as 'good as you' and me (as they claim), then the number of pædophiles amongst them would be such as to make those who prey on children a very small minority.  Sadly, that isn't the case.

Homosexuals do not restrict their antics to the bedroom.  They have their own pubs and nightclubs and entire areas of various cities (including much of Brighton and Canal Street in Manchester).  That in itself isn't a problem really, and could be seen as a positive thing as it allows for people who wish to sodomise one another to meet amongst people who share this desire.  Creating a parallel society with no links to the majority population cannot be anything but a good thing.  The more separate they make themselves, the better.  Unfortunately, they do not want to be separate.  Gay pride is a euphemism; what they really mean is gay power.  The pride marchers are gay supremacists and they will stop at nothing to queer the nation to give them total control.

What is a problem with the gay agenda is that they operate in a manner which would make the Freemasons blush - when homosexuals gain positions of authority in the workplace, government or elsewhere, they use their positions to discriminate against people who do not share their proclivities.  Whereas heterosexuals don't generally give a damn about the sexual activities of others, homosexual managers make a point of demanding that only their fellow bottom-lickers are promoted.  When they achieve positions in government, they use their influence to push for legislation which discriminates against excellence and in favour of perversion.  A man can apply for a job he is woefully unqualified for and get it simply because he likes to suck cock.  Gay pride must surely include an element of arrogant pride in the stupidity of ordinary people in allowing for legislation to be enacted which denies them advancement in work unless they indulge in turd burglary and poo-eating.

Not content with having Civil Partnerships created to give homosexuals legal protection in old age, allowing for one 'partner' of a couple to gain the equivalent of Widow's Benefit in the advent of the other dying (forgetting that homosexuals are notoriously promiscuous and thus unlikely to form lasting relationships), gay power activists have taken it upon themselves to destroy the institution of marriage, which exists to protect children and families.  There is no need for gay marriage; civil partnerships are 'marriage' in all but name.  The fact that the name of marriage itself has been usurped is an act of political terrorism, with no benefit to the homosexuals, other than to make a mockery of real marriage.

In schools, sodomites have pushed through sex education classes which encourage underage boys to sodomise one another and to fall for the lure of predatory homosexual pædophiles.  The natural idea of one man and one woman marrying, living together monogamously, and raising children to do likewise, has been steamrollered to make way for the gay lifestyle of anonymous casual sex, with the accompanying increase on sexually transmitted diseases, depression, mental illness, inability to form stable relationships, experiments with race-mixing, fatherless bastard children and many other ills which are wrecking society.  Gay pride is a pride in creating misery for the rest of us and imposing a lifestyle which was previously (and correctly) identified as dysfunctional and borne of mental illness, upon society as a whole.

The rainbow flag should not be flown over public buildings.  To do so is to afford it recognition as one would a sovereign nation.  The rainbow flag is not a symbol of pride, but of supremacist gay power.  Perhaps though, this may be a good thing.  The more homosexuals insult us by demanding that we are denied employment so that they can get cushy jobs which they are not qualified enough to be entitled to; the more they use their control over government to subvert our laws, corrupt our children and make their dominance impossible to ignore, the more we will be able to identify them as a separate sovereign entity.  Perhaps a solution to the homosexual problem would be to accept their rainbow flag as a political symbol, and to embrace their separatism.  

Greece is financially ruined thanks to the bankers (including a good many gay power sorts).  Perhaps the pink mafia could use their financial clout to buy a couple of Greek islands, returning the lesbians to the region from which their name comes and taking the sodomites with them - obviously to a different island, considering how genuinely sexist they are (it is well known that gays hate women and lesbians hate men).  

Imagine a world in which all the sodomites have somewhere to live, to bum each other in the streets if they wish to, and where they can harm no one who doesn't enjoy the dubious pleasures of buggery?  Imagine a world where the lettuce-lickers of Hebden Bridge can join with their fellows from across the globe to wear their purple Doc Martens, shave their heads, strap on fake knobs and crack on with their perversions? A couple of decadent islands full of writhing sex addicts, gobbling down fæces and dressing as prostitutes of the opposite sex, would be a small price to pay for liberating the rest of the world from individuals whose lust for perversion comes second only to their lust for power.  Let their people go - please let their people go!