ITP Final Conflict revisited: FC 1925 / FC 1563, 26th April 2002 / 14th February 2001

ANOTHER TV NIGHT!

Can the media plummet to any greater depths? I would have considered that to be unlikely, but now I'm not so sure. On BBC2 on Thursday the 25th April I witnessed a level of mendacity which would have made Chairman Mao cringe.

I just caught the end of a programme concerning the Second World War, in which it was stated as absolute fact that the evil Germans had invaded Austria against the wishes of the Austrian people and subjugated them. This was a somewhat novel explanation of the Anschluss! The programme featured

the poor persecuted Jews scrubbing steps (Shock horror!) and went on to interview "survivors" of the "extermination" camps, of whom it seems there are quite a few about - so much for German efficiency! Stalin was portrayed as the liberator of Poland (sic/sick) and to cap it all, a brief scene

depicting the evacuees in England had more blacks in it than a crack-house in Brixton!

The next programme was an "educational" offering, designed to explain to us why the refuse, sorry refugees, must be welcomed into our country. A poor innocent Kurd (as if) explained that when he is told to go back to his own country by nasty evil white (or should that be Turk) racists, he simply explains that God gave the land for everyone and that there are no borders or nations. At this point I spat my cup of tea all over the cat - sorry moggy!

The programmes shared more than just historical inaccuracy and extremist liberal bias, they were also aimed at the same target audience. The programmes were specifically designed for indoctrinating primary school children. You may ask if the fact that these children are all under 12 makes any difference? I say it does. As numerous Psychologists have found, the key formative years for moulding a child's view of the world are the years 5 to 8. Hence the emphasis on getting them to believe all the anti-European dogma as early as possible. (I'm not speaking of quacks like Sigmund Fraud, but of more culturally and ethnically compatible researchers). Next Thursday the programme 'Focus' will be exploring "racism". It will be on BBC2 at 12.10 if anybody can stomach it.

Over on BBC1 there followed the news with a report on the Nigerian Damilola Taylor, who fell on a bottle and as a result of this accident died of his injuries. The Jury, quite sensibly, saw through the Police attempts to frame some boys who were nowhere near where he fell and acquitted them of a charge of murder. The Police immediately released a statement in which no apology was made for the wrongful arrest and imprisonment of the accused. They then went on to repeat the ridiculous assertion that the boy had been murdered. It seems that blacks cannot have accidents - they always have to be attacked, presumably by white racists! They admitted that they had put as much manpower into searching for the "murderers" as they would have in investigating a terrorist attack, but had found nothing (because no murder occurred!) They stated that it was a bad day for the London Police as they hadn't been able to lock anyone up, which in the wake of the Stephen Lawrence farce made them look incompetent and stupid. How could they be described as incompetent for not finding people responsible for an accident in which no-one but the dead boy was involved? It transpires that one of the accused was a rapist - regardless of his innocence in this case he should not have been at liberty anyway. That's liberalism for you - let rapists off and hunt down "racists" even where there are none.

When did this country turn into a loony bin? No doubt we'll now see the ANaL marching through the streets bleating about racism - perhaps they should sue the makers of the bottle the lad fell on! They can always get the BBC to push their ideology. It dawned on me why these sponging foreigners come to England seeking 'asylum' - because that's exactly what the establishment are turning our country into.

[Ed: Rufus you should have watched the Donal MacIntyre programme on BBC1

after the Panorama programme on Damilola Taylor - and I think he WAS

murdered by the Black gang who have sexually assaulted at least one girl

and done much more besides.

    For those who forgot, MacIntyre was the Irish journalist who

infiltrated the Chelsea Headhunters in order to show how football hooligans

were neo-Nazi nutters.

    Well, what a treat last night to see the red/liberal/multi-racist

MacIntyre have a knife pulled on him by a Black man who only moments before

the liberal MacIntyre was telling how the Irish and Blacks get on so well

[try telling that to the Irish in Eire or in North London - where they feel

threatened by Black hoodlums].

    It was a joy to behold! of course, all the muggers were black - and all

the victims White [except for Black Marxist Darcus Howe who deserves it

anyway!] - but MacIntyre went on about the AGES of victims and muggers --

NOT their races.

    Let's hope Mr. MacIntyre has more reason to potter about the streets of

South London... where he can tell the muggers - "Don't mug me bro' I'm

Irish"... and see how long his White backside lasts!].

###############################################

CHANNEL 4

The nauseous clique who control the media never fail to spread their evil dogma and pollute what remains of our culture. At the forefront of overt attacks has been Channel 4, although the other sections of the establishment media have consistently fought against decency ­ just more slyly. 

In recent times the public have begun to shake their chains in protest against the invasion of our lands by hostile inassimilable aliens. Channel 4 has reacted by producing a series of programmes dedicated to ‘educating’ the people into accepting that we need immigrants to do jobs we won’t (ha!) and that were they not here our economy would collapse (as if we need the fast-food mass-capitalist anti-culture anyway). They are pushing the lie that we have benefited from the multi-culti melting-pot experience and should do even more to welcome our new fellow citizens. The fact that we now have Mujahadeen openly training on our soil to fight against the infidel (us) is an irrelevant detail. To put the icing on the cake, every piece of pro-invasion propaganda has been followed by a confidential telephone number to assist the illegal’s (surely a criminal act in itself?) One documentary showed indigenous homeless people whining about immigrants getting instant accommodation and benefits. How dare they complain ­ get back in your cardboard boxes! 

As if Channel 4’s propaganda offensive was not sickening enough they are now endorsing the ‘alternative lifestyle’ of pædophilia. One ‘documentary’ openly discussed ‘Lolitas’ (victims of child-porn peddlers / rapist-kidnappers). They even showed web-pages and internet addresses! Where were you MI6? Why have these evil sites not been closed down and those responsible punished? Is it because half those involved pay your wages? Of a similar vein is Channel 4’s pro-queer campaign (anti Section 28 / pro ‘man-boy love’ (ugh)). To celebrate their successes Film 4 (a Channel 4 sub-channel) organised a queer-fest for the weekend 9/2 ­11/2, doubtless pushing their queer / pædo agenda. 

So who are the dangerous deviants behind Channel 4? Is it just an obscure little company of little significance? Can’t the government do something to curb the excesses? The fact is Channel 4 is wholly owned by the government! It’s programming content is controlled by the State on whose behalf it acts. And no it is not insignificant ­ it is a major player in the British media, and growing rapidly. 

Still, it’s not all bad news. Whilst not actively (or subtly) promoting all things perverse, our beloved rulers are clamping down on dangerous subversives ­ guess who! 

Waiting for the 4 A.M. knock on the door, 

p.s. A note of caution. Contrary to the stereotype, those who are involved in the anti-establishment resistance are less-likely to believe anything from any source without checking it for themselves. With regards to pædophilia on the internet this conscientious habit should be temporarily halted. Once a web-site is down-loaded no matter how rigorously the files are deleted (even formatting the hard disk is not enough), some evidence will remain. The only way to be sure all traces have been removed is to physically smash the hard disk. This is quite an expensive way to achieve proof of information! Of equal importance, viewing such filth encourages the exploitation ­ and the Police would just love to have a show-trial against “Nazi” Perverts! 

[Ed: Whilst we are aware of one Comrade who has been active on finding out details of people involved in paedo chat rooms etc and sending out the details to people who can publicise where these sickos live, we would suggest that NO-ONE EVER willingly goes onto paedo sites. Whether to track scumbags down or whatever - LEAVE WELL ALONE. Some of this stuff is just so damaging it will mentally effect anyone viewing it -- you even hear of long-serving coppers and legal people - and we all know how hard-heartened they are! - being affected by this rubbish. 

If people wish to take action against paedo pervs they should start by taking action in their communities. We have stickers and posters available for distribution...All of this stuff helps to raise awareness in communities. THAT is the best way to protect children from the perverts]. 

#########################################################

ITP Final Conflict revisited: FC 1924, 25th April 2002

PAEDOPHILE PRIESTS

A disturbing item of news being currently pushed by the media is the phenomenon of pædophilia in the Catholic Church. Principally the stories concern the Church in the USA, although other countries, (such as Eire), are also mentioned.

The screaming media are clamouring for an end to celibacy in the Priesthood to combat this disgusting abuse. Admittedly, there is a sound logic for ending celibacy insofar as it is not a Scriptural prohibition but a Papal one. However, the implication is that the majority of the perverts who are wrecking the lives of children in their care would not do so if they were married, and so sexually satisfied.

What the howling press do not mention is that the overwhelming abuse is of a homosexual nature. Why is this? Simply because the media are pro-queer (and often actively queer) and do not want the truth about homosexuality to be exposed - namely that a disproportionate number of pædophiles are queer, and vice versa.

What the press also omit to mention is that pædophilia is not an exclusively Christian problem. Indeed, the worst abuse of children in a religious setting comes from the diabolical Moslems! It is almost as sickening as the abuse itself that the anti-Christian media are prepared to ignore perverts who hide behind Islam, whilst digging out every possible incidence which can be linked to Christianity. It is also hypocritical as the media are quite happy to plug homosexuality as a "lifestyle" even though the despicable Peter Tatchell and his bum-chums in NAMBLA want to practically scrap any age limits on buggery at all.

Child abuse and all other forms of perversion must be exposed wherever they appear. Those who commit theses acts must be punished in the traditional manner - stoning to death. Only when we have a decent society prepared to say NO to these monsters can this sickness be eradicated. Then of course

the connected problem of media licentiousness will be dealt with simultæneously - as most of the media will no longer be around to spread their filth!!

ITP Final Conflict revisited: FC 1923, 24th April 2002

ST GEORGE'S DAY REFLECTIONS

The 23rd of April this year has been one of the best St. George's Days ever for the ordinary people of England. Although we were denied a National Holiday (all the other nations in the UK get one for their Saint's Days), many people took the day off to celebrate anyway. I was fortunate enough to be with a group of people doing just that.

Our little group took the opportunity to explore a little of our Nation. We started in Sheffield and to our dismay the City Council were doing nothing to mark the day - or else it was so low-key we couldn't find anything. This was hardly surprising as the City has an extreme left (pseudo-democratic

Red) council. It is not that long ago that the City Hall had the Red Flag of the USSR flying from it! Even in this bastion of tired Trotskyism the people were celebrating. It was indeed a good sight to behold.

We travelled next to Nottingham. The contrast could not have been starker. Everywhere we went where the indigenous people were in the majority, the Cross of Saint George could be seen. The feeling in the City was amazing - people who had been told for years that we cannot be proud to be English were refusing to bow to this treason and were partying with gusto! Excellent.

We managed to take in a few smaller towns during the day and the experience was almost universally the same - The Flag was on display, the people showing their pride and loyalty. This is how England should be. As I have said, the experience was almost, but not completely, a shared one. So where were the exceptions? Two examples were Darnall (Sheffield) and Radford (Nottingham) where not a single English Flag could be seen, and there was certainly no display of National Pride (at least not to England). The Mosques were just as alien as ever and the only signs of loyalty to a Nation were perhaps the Saris etc worn by the residents!!

Once again the immigrants have shown their disdain for our culture by refusing to participate. This is excellent. Ever more we are seeing the invaders distancing themselves from us and proving that multi-culturalism is a lie. They will not assimilate and that's fine by me! They shouldn't even try. They should just leave and take pride in their own Nations - at home in them.

It was a good day. Too often we only see what is bad with our society. The positive experience that we as a Nation shared was one of defiance and genuine pride in what we know we are - better than the traitors who govern us. 

The false state of the UK is morally finished as can be seen by the rejection of it's imperialistic rag. The UK is dead - Long Live England!

ITP Final Conflict revisited: FC 1917/19/20, 17th/19th/20th April 2002

DYKES DESIGNING DEAF BABIES

Recently on the radio (BBC 2) there was a discussion about designer babies. The story was basically that a couple had deliberately chosen to breed a deaf baby. The mother in question was deaf from birth and wanted her child to experience the 'cultural richness' of the deaf world. To do this she had to mate with a man who was also congenitally deaf. I kid you not.

The deranged muppet stated that deafness was not a disability but a different cultural lifestyle, and that it was her "right" (ugh) to bring a deaf child into the world. It transpired the child was her second - the first also being deaf and produced the same way. I don't believe in "Rights" and such liberal crap but if I did I would have to ask, what about the right of the child to be given a chance to be born with all it's faculties intact? Life is struggle enough without some lunatic deciding for you that you will be born impaired!

Throughout the report, the panel praised the woman and not one of them condemned her decision or the idiots who facilitated it. It should come as no surprise that the woman was a self-righteous lesbian with an axe to grind.

Imagine the uproar if women were to deliberately engineer "perfect" babies. That is unforgivable in the topsy turvy world of political correctness, but crippling an unborn child is fine. The poor little mites should be taken from the un-natural home they have been brought into and given to normal people to raise. As for the mother, a good kicking to death wouldn't go amiss!

Rufus.

............

FC Editorial Response:

Sadly Rufus' letter (DYKES DESIGNING DEAF BABIES) is correct, and I have personal experience in this area. While the System rants and raves in condemning "Nazi" eugenics, the System itself, and it's pathetic dupes such as these lesbians, carries out breeding experiments of its own.

Jim Jones of the Jonestown Suicide Cult, was one early proponent of this--he purposely adopted kids out of the Third World to form his own "rainbow family." Sadly this continues, with churches and agencies specializing in Third World adoptions, ignoring the thousands of kids at home who also need families. The dysgenic breeding of deaf children shows the selfishness of people who have taken everything they've seen on television seriously. In an effort to deny "normalcy" these people are purposely living out their own psychosis on the backs of the innocent.

Another, linked situation has to do with homosexuals raising children. At one school where I once worked, two dykes had done this, and their young "son" was, at age 4, a quivering wreck of a lad, scared of his own shadow. When I read him tales of knights, his "moms" raised hell with me that he was displaying "sexist" and violent tendencies at odds with their own insanity. I also found (now possess) copies of children's books pushing homosexual "families"--one of the "dads" complete with a hulking crotch (no doubt as a titillation for a "dad").

Friends of mine who are still in the conservative phase often get green at the gills when they see this information. They focus on the FAGS, or on the CHURCHES, or on the AUTHORS of these books. As I point out to them, there are no quick fixes. Simply: A SOCIETY THAT PERMITS THIS SHOULD BE DESTROYED!

......................

Homosexuality and child molestation: the link, the likelihood, the lasting effects

Some homosexuals want the next generation …in mind and body

By Ed Vitagliano

If there is one area of the debate over homosexuality that

seems to make pro-family groups squeamish and homosexuals

indignant, it is the issue of molestation. Do homosexuals pose a

direct danger to children?

It is probably safe to say that, for most of this century most

Americans intuitively saw homosexuals as a threat to their

children. After all, homosexuality was by definition a sexual

perversion, and where there was one perversion

(homosexuality) there would likely be another (molestation).

But by the mid-1990s homosexual activists had succeeded in

hijacking the public debate on sexual orientation issues, and a

new creed had replaced the old: homosexuals posed no danger

to children.

Is this true? Are children safe in the presence of homosexuals,

or are they in danger of sexual abuse that may, in fact, lead

them into the homosexual lifestyle?

Homosexuality and pedophila

It should be said from the outset that a homosexual orientation

does not automatically lead to pedophilia, and most

homosexuals do not abuse children. Moreover, most

homosexual activist groups publicly denounce pedophilia.

But that is not the end of the story. Psychiatrist Jeffrey

Satinover says in his book Homosexuality and the Politics of

Truth that there is a “substantial, influential, and growing

segment of the homosexual community that neither hides nor

condemns pedophilia.”

One reason for this may be that the homosexual movement is

based on the rather simple ethic of individual sexual freedom. In

the activist magazine Gayme, writer Bill Andriette said, “The

only standard for moral sex…is that it be freely and equally

consented to by the persons involved.”

 From that sexual ethic to one which includes intergenerational

sex is but a short leap. Andriette said, “There is no question

that blacks, whites, women, men, children, and adolescents can

consent to sex …. If we want really to respect the authenticity

of individuals we have to let people take risks, explore different

values, and recognize that we will be challenged and threatened

by what they discover.” (Emphasis added.)

This homosexual perspective was in full view nearly three

decades ago, with the release of the 1972 Gay Rights Platform.

Activists in Chicago, representing the fledgling homosexual

movement, demanded the “[r]epeal of all state laws prohibiting

private sexual acts involving consenting persons,” and the

“[r]epeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.”

Such homosexuals see society’s disapproval of adult-child sex

as the transgression, rather than the adult-child sex itself. In The

Age Taboo: Gay Male Sexuality, Power and Consent, lesbian

author Pat Califia said, “Boy lovers and the lesbians who have

young lovers…are not child molesters. The child abusers are

priests, teachers, therapists, cops and parents who force their

staid morality onto the young people in their custody.”

Moreover, for many homosexuals, this same-sex attraction to

minors may stem from their own sexual experiences. Research

shows that very often homosexuals had their own initial

same-sex encounter with an adult while children. (See AFA

Journal, May 1999.)

Writing in The Advocate, a magazine for homosexuals, Carl

Maves agreed. “How many gay men, I wonder, would have

missed out on a valuable, liberating experience  one that

initiated them into their sexuality  if it weren’t for so-called

molestation?” he said.

Perhaps the most notorious group advocating adult-child sex is

the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).

An unashamedly pedophile organization, NAMBLA wants

society to appreciate, rather than deplore, intergen-erational

sex, and to abolish laws banning sex between adults and

minors.

While most homosexual activist groups publicly denounce

NAMBLA and its agenda, the pedophile group is still allowed

to march in “gay” pride parades in New York, San Francisco

and Boston under its own NAMBLA banner.

Furthermore, some suggest that public disavowal of NAMBLA

by homosexual groups is a smokescreen. David Thorstad, a

founding member of NAMBLA and former president of New

York’s Gay Activists Alliance, says homosexual activists have

supressed pedophilia in order “to sanitize the image of

homosexuality to facilitate its entrance into the social

mainstream.”

Do homosexuals molest children?

Such talk of molestation enrages homosexual activists, eliciting

charges that pro-family groups paint the entire homosexual

community with too broad a brush. They argue that such

pro-pedophile views are simply the perspective of fringe

groups.

Homosexuals additionally charge that most molestation cases

involve heterosexuals. One frequently-cited study, Jenny,

Roesler and Poyer, 1994, published in Pediatrics, supposedly

demonstrated that 98% of men who abused children

self-identified as heterosexual.

But in a review of the Jenny study, Dr. Paul Cameron of Family

Research Institute said the researchers merely examined

hospital charts: “[N]either the victims, perpetrators, nor even

those who prepared the charts were interviewed” to discover

their sexual orientation.

In fact, said Cameron, in the only study (Erickson, Walbek,

and Seely, 1988) in which perpetrators were asked to declare

their sexual orientation, almost the opposite was found to be

true: 86% of child molesters identified themselves as

homosexual or bisexual.

If heterosexuals make up the preponderance of child molesters

in raw numbers, it is not surprising. Heterosexuals, after all,

make up more than 97% of the population.

A more accurate assessment, however, would compare ratios

of population size to incidences of involvement in pedophilia. In

this regard, according to the National Association on Research

and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), in proportion to

their numbers, homosexual men are more likely to engage in

sex with a minor.

Citing a study (Freund and Watson, 1992) which was reported

in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, NARTH found that

homosexual males were “three times more likely than straight

men to engage in adult-child sexual relations.”

Cameron’s own research shows even higher rates of

homosexual molestation. In the Nebraska Medical Journal

Cameron said that when data from both genders are combined,

homosexuals are at least 8-12 times more likely to molest

children than are heterosexuals.

In the face of such overwhelming evidence, homosexual

activists resort to a circular argument: since true homosexuals

only desire sex with another adult, then pedophiles cannot be

homosexual. In effect, activists have simply defined homosexual

molestation of children out of existence.

But the words of homosexuals themselves betray them. Writing

in the homosexual magazine Out, columnist Dan Savage

mentioned that he lives near a park where some local high

school soccer teams practice. “Some of the boys are really

something else, and during practice they play shirts and skins.

Any gay man who tells you he can walk by a boy’s soccer

team without looking is a liar…,” Savage said.

Homosexual access to children

Such evidence has chilling public policy implications. The

momentous changes in Americans’ attitudes towards sexual

orientation are giving homosexuals unprecedented access to the

nation’s children.

Parents, for example, were mortified when New York City’s

WNBC-TV uncovered the existence of pedophiles within the

public school system. According to an article by John Leo in

U.S. News & World Report, the City Board of Education had

known about at least one pedophile  teacher Peter Melzer

since 1984, but did nothing about it.

Melzer, as it turned out, is on the NAMBLA steering

committee and the editorial board of the organization’s

periodical, the NAMBLA Bulletin. In the past, the Bulletin has

recommended the best tactics to its pedophile readers for

seducing children into sexual encounters.

Leo said, “Child molesters don’t just hang around playgrounds.

They apply for jobs at schools, camps, the Boy Scouts, Big

Brothers, YMCAs. ‘Boy lovers’ love to work where the boys

are.”

When pedophiles strike, the results are often disastrous. A

recent review (Holmes and Slap, 1998) of the research on the

molestation of boys, published in the prestigious Journal of the

American Medical Association showed that adolescent boys

who were abused by men were up to seven times more likely

to identify themselves as homosexual or bisexual.

Furthermore, research also shows a strong link between the

sexual abuse of a child and that child’s later pedophilia as an

adult. At the Connecticut Correctional Institution, for example,

clinical psychologist A. Nicholas Groth, director of the sex

offender program, said 85% of the pedophiles were themselves

sexually assaulted as youths.

This casts certain parts of the homosexual agenda in a more

sinister light  such as the drive to lower the legal age of sexual

consent and to expunge sodomy laws from the books. It might

also cause parents to wonder why homosexual activists are

tireless in their efforts to use the courts as a crowbar to pry

open the doors of the Boy Scouts to homosexual troop

leaders.

Again, it would be unfair to imply that all  or even most

homosexuals are a threat to children. Nevertheless, there are

some elements of the homosexual movement which openly

endorse pedophilia. And opening the social “doors” to all

homosexual groups will allow pedophile groups in as well.

Future shame

What will research show in ten years? Twenty years? Will we

discover that we have handed over an entire generation, only to

discover that homosexuality in this nation has doubled or

tripled?

If it is true, as evidence suggests, that children can be recruited

into the homosexual lifestyle, what will history say about a

generation of adults that swallowed  hook, line and sinker

the lies fabricated by the very ones who abused their children?

..........................

Further Response by Steve J, Newcastle:

I confirm Rufus's general point about P.C. deaf people. I worked in the voluntary sector for several years amongst disabled people and it was the deaf ones who often caused trouble - by being stroppy, unrealistic, contradictory, self-obsessed, insecure bullies. It was obvious that even the 'lefty' leaning Disabled People's movement (DPM) organizations had problems coping with them.

For example the DPM account for disability from a Sociological point of view, that is, they ask the public to not just look at a disabled person's medical condition, but also look at the way buildings may create barriers to their access, employers may not want a disabled person on their staff and so

on. But deaf people would join DPM organisations, turn up at meetings and conferences and disrupt them by saying that they weren't 'disabled' at all, that disabled people were oppressing them by labelling them as such, and that deafness was a 'cultural' experience. Apparently we (the hearing

public, whether disabled in any way or not) are really missing out by not being deaf and that this disability would vanish if we all began signing with gusto in bus-queues, at the pub, at weddings, at concerts or wherever.

Get real.

I found that deaf people were liable to get very stroppy with hearing people, at several meetings the deaf people were verging on beating up individuals in wheelchairs who were just trying to discuss minor issues with them. This may be due to a huge inferiority complex or maybe just because they can't hear, so they miss the subtle audible cues of normal conversation and don't follow the pauses and murmers that are so important for those using normal verbal languages.

The big joke is that while the deaf loudly moaned that they weren't disabled, nevertheless they were more than happy to tick the 'disability' box and grab a piece of any funding that was going from the disabled people's movement. I saw many piggy-back from the DPM into jobs with serious money and perks with the local media, the BBC, and even as spokespeople on 'disability' issues (!) for the Regional Arts Council in the North East.

The latter incidentally was a clueless lesbian too.

ITP Final Conflict revisited: FC 1802, 13th December 2001

EU DANCING ON OUR GRAVES?

As if to prove that they are totally inhuman, the federal government in Bruxelles are backing a scheme for a new Euro-motorway which will cut right across the graves of the dead from the Great War. Tens of thousands of Europeans lie beneath the soil in and around Flanders. This means nothing

to the bureaucrats who see the desecration of our ancestors last resting places as insignificant. They see first and foremost an opportunity to make millions of Euros by creating a more direct transport network for pushing their worthless tat onto the consumer zombies whom they manipulate through

their sham democracy.

This dishonourable arrogant attitude is only to be expected from the soul-less Capitalist mentality. It is not long ago that the Egyptian state built the Aswan Dam. This destroyed forever many great works of European culture - doubtless an embarrassment to the One-Worlders who despise our great common history. The same sickness pervades the despicable modern grave robbers who like to hide behind the once noble label of archaeology.

Whether it is large scale destruction or the now commonplace practice of moving headstones from graveyards but leaving the bodies and then building supermarkets, mosques etc on the land, the reasoning is the same - we don't matter, only money is sacred. How much longer will our people allow this treason against our culture, history, nations?

The only way to deal with this vermin is to attack them where it hurts - to attack their wealth. Whether this is through boycotting their trashy goods, building our own counter economy, trying to go self -sufficient or other means, we can all do something. Our people are in a trance. They will only

wake up when they see a viable alternative developing from the ruins of the present occupying system. To smash the old order is not enough, (vital though it is). We need also to build the natural solution which will finish the parasites for ever. 

We can do it. We must.

ITP Final Conflict revisited: FC 1795, 5th December 2001

THE SUPER SOAR-AWAY SUN

Fellow Heretics!

For the benefit(?) of those readers fortunate enough to never have clapped eyes upon England's most popular 'news'paper, here is a brief summary some of the greatest moments of this establishment pillar:

When the despicable Thatcher dishonoured the Royal Navy by ordering its crew to murder Argentine sailors on the General Belgrano as it retreated from the Islas Malvinas/Falklands, this rag ran the headline "GOTCHA!" The nation should have wept with shame at the slaughter of fellow Europeans but was led into hysterical celebrations - all so Thatcher could win an election.

When Police incompetence led to the deaths of dozens of Liverpool footballs fans in Sheffield, the filth press declared it was the fans to blame, and campaigned for the Police to be treated as heroes because the number of people crushed to death wasn't more - the Police were given compensation,

the victims' families got nothing.

Routinely the trashy gutter press runs stories of complete fiction which ruin peoples lives, but then use their lawyers to silence those who value the truth. They joke about naughty vicars (pædophiles) and push immorality - topless women on page 3 is a laugh innit? Is it really considering the context of the stories scattered throughout this paper?

You may ask "why raise these issues now, when they're just old news?" Why?

Because the scum who peddle this filth declared in the editorial of Tuesday 4th December's issue that poor little Isræl was being persecuted by the horrible Palestinians and after "September 11" (note the Yankee date-style) we're all Isrælis now!

Hopefully none of FC's readers buy the Sun - if you do stop now! This vile paper has successfully whipped the unthinking masses into supporting all manner of treason and evil. They are now baying for the sacrificial blood of Palestinians, all in the fight against terrorism of course. Never mind the thousands (millions?) murdered by Zionism. After they've finished persecuting the poorest people in the world for refusing to bow to Zion, who's next?

Think, Prepare, Act! Rufus.

Jo Cox snuffed out to boost EU Remain campaign

Jo Cox is dead.  She was killed in Batley by a man who it is claimed is a neo-nazi.  The motive? Why, because she was campaigning for the UK to remain trapped in the EU concentration camp! Seriously - we are supposed to believe that some lunatic nazi shot her dead because killing a puppet politician would change things in the UK!

But would killing an MP have an impact upon public life?  Well, if the intention was to paint pro-Freedom advocates as 'terrorists' and to make voting to leave the EU appear to be an act of condoning terrorism, then yes, there would be an impact.  Any Freedom advocate would have to be a complete retard to think that killing an anti-Freedom MP would help the cause.  Killing any MP is pointless, as they're all puppets of the Ruling Class and even if the whole lot of them were wiped out, more parasites would take their places.  But killing Jo Cox as the Referendum looked certain to be won by those who cherish Freedom, would be an act of gross stupidity - unless of course the intention was to wreck the Freedom campaign and guilt the imbecile public into voting to keep the shackles of EU oppression in place.

Jo Cox was a hate-filled globaliser.  She campaigned to keep the UK in the EU gulag. She campaigned to have millions of terrorist filth allowed into the UK in the same way as Merkel has allowed them into Germany.  She campaigned for the destabilisation of Israel and the creation of a half-baked 'country' known as Palestine. Her service to the people of Batley where she was MP was one-sided, serving the immigrant population and pushing the mohammedan agenda at the expense of the indigenous people. Killing her will only make the dim-witted emotional knee-jerkers react with sympathy to the policies she pushed and with hostility to anyone who stands up to her globalist evil.

Jo Cox was killed to keep the UK in the EU.  She was also killed to create sympathy with the lunatic ideal of opening the borders (what borders!) to endless numbers of free-loaders, terrorists and religious bigots.  She was killed to silence any dissent to the Globalist agenda.  Since being killed by the State at the behest of the EU, over £100,000 has been raised for bogus charities such as the police state group, Hope Not Hate.  Her death is a tragedy for the UK - but not because an individual has been snuffed out, rather because her death will be used to smash the last vestiges of freedom in the already terrifyingly dictatorial UK.

Just to rub our noses in it, the by-election to replace Cox will not be contested by the ruling Conservative Party, thus meaning her successor will be an appointed Labour stooge rather than being genuinely elected (even though a farcical voting charade will be undergone).  

Vote Leave next week. Fight against the enemies of Freedom.  The depths they will go to include killing one of their own to generate political capital.  If they will do this to an insider like Cox, they will have no qualms about destroying you, your children and your future.