Recently on the radio (BBC 2) there was a discussion
about designer babies. The story was basically that a couple had
deliberately chosen to breed a deaf baby. The mother in question was deaf from
birth and wanted her child to experience the 'cultural richness' of the deaf
world. To do this she had to mate with a man who was also congenitally
deaf. I kid you not.
The deranged muppet stated that deafness was not a
disability but a different cultural lifestyle, and that it was her
"right" (ugh) to bring a deaf child into the world. It transpired the child was her
second - the first also being deaf and produced the same way. I don't
believe in "Rights" and such liberal crap but if I did I
would have to ask, what about the right of the child to be given a chance to be born with
all it's faculties intact? Life is struggle enough without some
lunatic deciding for you that you will be born impaired!
Throughout the report, the panel praised the woman and not
one of them condemned her decision or the idiots who facilitated it. It
should come as no surprise that the woman was a self-righteous lesbian with
an axe to grind.
Imagine the uproar if women were to deliberately engineer
"perfect" babies. That is unforgivable in the topsy turvy world of political
correctness, but crippling an unborn child is fine. The poor little mites
should be taken from the un-natural home they have been brought into and
given to normal people to raise. As for the mother, a good kicking to death wouldn't go
amiss!
Rufus.
............
FC Editorial Response:
Sadly Rufus' letter (DYKES DESIGNING DEAF BABIES) is
correct, and I have personal experience in this area. While the System rants and
raves in condemning "Nazi" eugenics, the System itself, and
it's pathetic dupes such as these lesbians, carries out breeding experiments of its
own.
Jim Jones of the Jonestown Suicide Cult, was one early
proponent of this--he purposely adopted kids out of the Third World to form his
own "rainbow family." Sadly this continues, with churches and
agencies specializing in Third World adoptions, ignoring the thousands of kids at
home who also need families. The dysgenic breeding of deaf children shows the
selfishness of people who have taken everything they've seen on television
seriously. In an effort to deny "normalcy" these people are
purposely living out their own psychosis on the backs of the innocent.
Another, linked situation has to do with homosexuals raising
children. At one school where I once worked, two dykes had done this, and
their young "son" was, at age 4, a quivering wreck of a lad,
scared of his own shadow. When I read him tales of knights, his "moms"
raised hell with me that he was displaying "sexist" and violent tendencies at odds
with their own insanity. I also found (now possess) copies of children's books
pushing homosexual "families"--one of the "dads" complete
with a hulking crotch (no doubt as a titillation for a "dad").
Friends of mine who are still in the conservative phase
often get green at the gills when they see this information. They focus on the
FAGS, or on the CHURCHES, or on the AUTHORS of these books. As I point out
to them, there are no quick fixes. Simply: A SOCIETY THAT PERMITS THIS SHOULD BE DESTROYED!
......................
Homosexuality and child molestation: the link, the
likelihood, the lasting effects
Some homosexuals want the next generation …in mind and body
By Ed Vitagliano
If there is one
area of the debate over homosexuality that
seems to make pro-family groups squeamish and homosexuals
indignant, it is the issue of molestation. Do homosexuals
pose a
direct danger to children?
It is probably safe to say that, for most of this century
most
Americans intuitively saw homosexuals as a threat to their
children. After all, homosexuality was by definition a
sexual
perversion, and where there was one perversion
(homosexuality) there would likely be another (molestation).
But by the mid-1990s homosexual activists had succeeded in
hijacking the public debate on sexual orientation issues,
and a
new creed had replaced the old: homosexuals posed no danger
to children.
Is this true? Are children safe in the presence of
homosexuals,
or are they in danger of sexual abuse that may, in fact,
lead
them into the homosexual lifestyle?
Homosexuality and pedophila
It should be said from the outset that a homosexual orientation
does not automatically lead to pedophilia, and most
homosexuals do not abuse children. Moreover, most
homosexual activist groups publicly denounce pedophilia.
But that is not the end of the story. Psychiatrist Jeffrey
Satinover says in his book Homosexuality and the Politics of
Truth that there is a “substantial, influential, and growing
segment of the homosexual community that neither hides nor
condemns pedophilia.”
One reason for this may be that the homosexual movement is
based on the rather simple ethic of individual sexual
freedom. In
the activist magazine Gayme, writer Bill Andriette said,
“The
only standard for moral sex…is that it be freely and equally
consented to by the persons involved.”
From that sexual ethic
to one which includes intergenerational
sex is but a short leap. Andriette said, “There is no
question
that blacks, whites, women, men, children, and adolescents
can
consent to sex …. If we want really to respect the
authenticity
of individuals we have to let people take risks, explore
different
values, and recognize that we will be challenged and
threatened
by what they discover.” (Emphasis added.)
This homosexual perspective was in full view nearly three
decades ago, with the release of the 1972 Gay Rights
Platform.
Activists in Chicago, representing the fledgling homosexual
movement, demanded the “[r]epeal of all state laws
prohibiting
private sexual acts involving consenting persons,” and the
“[r]epeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.”
Such homosexuals see society’s disapproval of adult-child
sex
as the transgression, rather than the adult-child sex
itself. In The
Age Taboo: Gay Male Sexuality, Power and Consent, lesbian
author Pat Califia said, “Boy lovers and the lesbians who
have
young lovers…are not child molesters. The child abusers are
priests, teachers, therapists, cops and parents who force
their
staid morality onto the young people in their custody.”
Moreover, for many homosexuals, this same-sex attraction to
minors may stem from their own sexual experiences. Research
shows that very often homosexuals had their own initial
same-sex encounter with an adult while children. (See AFA
Journal, May 1999.)
Writing in The Advocate, a magazine for homosexuals, Carl
Maves agreed. “How many gay men, I wonder, would have
missed out on a valuable, liberating experience one that
initiated them into their sexuality if it weren’t for so-called
molestation?” he said.
Perhaps the most notorious group advocating adult-child sex
is
the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).
An unashamedly pedophile organization, NAMBLA wants
society to appreciate, rather than deplore,
intergen-erational
sex, and to abolish laws banning sex between adults and
minors.
While most homosexual activist groups publicly denounce
NAMBLA and its agenda, the pedophile group is still allowed
to march in “gay” pride parades in New York, San Francisco
and Boston under its own NAMBLA banner.
Furthermore, some suggest that public disavowal of NAMBLA
by homosexual groups is a smokescreen. David Thorstad, a
founding member of NAMBLA and former president of New
York’s Gay Activists Alliance, says homosexual activists
have
supressed pedophilia in order “to sanitize the image of
homosexuality to facilitate its entrance into the social
mainstream.”
Do homosexuals molest children?
Such talk of molestation enrages homosexual activists,
eliciting
charges that pro-family groups paint the entire homosexual
community with too broad a brush. They argue that such
pro-pedophile views are simply the perspective of fringe
groups.
Homosexuals additionally charge that most molestation cases
involve heterosexuals. One frequently-cited study, Jenny,
Roesler and Poyer, 1994, published in Pediatrics, supposedly
demonstrated that 98% of men who abused children
self-identified as heterosexual.
But in a review of the Jenny study, Dr. Paul Cameron of
Family
Research Institute said the researchers merely examined
hospital charts: “[N]either the victims, perpetrators, nor
even
those who prepared the charts were interviewed” to discover
their sexual orientation.
In fact, said Cameron, in the only study (Erickson, Walbek,
and Seely, 1988) in which perpetrators were asked to declare
their sexual orientation, almost the opposite was found to
be
true: 86% of child molesters identified themselves as
homosexual or bisexual.
If heterosexuals make up the preponderance of child
molesters
in raw numbers, it is not surprising. Heterosexuals, after
all,
make up more than 97% of the population.
A more accurate assessment, however, would compare ratios
of population size to incidences of involvement in
pedophilia. In
this regard, according to the National Association on
Research
and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), in proportion to
their numbers, homosexual men are more likely to engage in
sex with a minor.
Citing a study (Freund and Watson, 1992) which was reported
in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, NARTH found that
homosexual males were “three times more likely than straight
men to engage in adult-child sexual relations.”
Cameron’s own research shows even higher rates of
homosexual molestation. In the Nebraska Medical Journal
Cameron said that when data from both genders are combined,
homosexuals are at least 8-12 times more likely to molest
children than are heterosexuals.
In the face of such overwhelming evidence, homosexual
activists resort to a circular argument: since true
homosexuals
only desire sex with another adult, then pedophiles cannot
be
homosexual. In effect, activists have simply defined
homosexual
molestation of children out of existence.
But the words of homosexuals themselves betray them. Writing
in the homosexual magazine Out, columnist Dan Savage
mentioned that he lives near a park where some local high
school soccer teams practice. “Some of the boys are really
something else, and during practice they play shirts and
skins.
Any gay man who tells you he can walk by a boy’s soccer
team without looking is a liar…,” Savage said.
Homosexual access to children
Such evidence has chilling public policy implications. The
momentous changes in Americans’ attitudes towards sexual
orientation are giving homosexuals unprecedented access to
the
nation’s children.
Parents, for example, were mortified when New York City’s
WNBC-TV uncovered the existence of pedophiles within the
public school system. According to an article by John Leo in
U.S. News & World Report, the City Board of Education
had
known about at least one pedophile teacher Peter Melzer
since 1984, but did nothing about it.
Melzer, as it turned out, is on the NAMBLA steering
committee and the editorial board of the organization’s
periodical, the NAMBLA Bulletin. In the past, the Bulletin
has
recommended the best tactics to its pedophile readers for
seducing children into sexual encounters.
Leo said, “Child molesters don’t just hang around
playgrounds.
They apply for jobs at schools, camps, the Boy Scouts, Big
Brothers, YMCAs. ‘Boy lovers’ love to work where the boys
are.”
When pedophiles strike, the results are often disastrous. A
recent review (Holmes and Slap, 1998) of the research on the
molestation of boys, published in the prestigious Journal of
the
American Medical Association showed that adolescent boys
who were abused by men were up to seven times more likely
to identify themselves as homosexual or bisexual.
Furthermore, research also shows a strong link between the
sexual abuse of a child and that child’s later pedophilia as
an
adult. At the Connecticut Correctional Institution, for
example,
clinical psychologist A. Nicholas Groth, director of the sex
offender program, said 85% of the pedophiles were themselves
sexually assaulted as youths.
This casts certain parts of the homosexual agenda in a more
sinister light such
as the drive to lower the legal age of sexual
consent and to expunge sodomy laws from the books. It might
also cause parents to wonder why homosexual activists are
tireless in their efforts to use the courts as a crowbar to
pry
open the doors of the Boy Scouts to homosexual troop
leaders.
Again, it would be unfair to imply that all or even most
homosexuals are a threat to children. Nevertheless, there
are
some elements of the homosexual movement which openly
endorse pedophilia. And opening the social “doors” to all
homosexual groups will allow pedophile groups in as well.
Future shame
What will research show in ten years? Twenty years? Will we
discover that we have handed over an entire generation, only
to
discover that homosexuality in this nation has doubled or
tripled?
If it is true, as evidence suggests, that children can be
recruited
into the homosexual lifestyle, what will history say about a
generation of adults that swallowed hook, line and sinker
the lies fabricated by the very ones who abused their
children?
..........................
Further Response by Steve J, Newcastle:
I confirm Rufus's general point about P.C. deaf people. I
worked in the voluntary sector for several years amongst disabled
people and it was the deaf ones who often caused trouble - by being stroppy,
unrealistic, contradictory, self-obsessed, insecure bullies. It was obvious
that even the 'lefty' leaning Disabled People's movement (DPM)
organizations had problems coping with them.
For example the DPM account for disability from a
Sociological point of view, that is, they ask the public to not just look at a
disabled person's medical condition, but also look at the way buildings may
create barriers to their access, employers may not want a disabled person on
their staff and so
on. But deaf people would join DPM organisations, turn up at
meetings and conferences and disrupt them by saying that they weren't
'disabled' at all, that disabled people were oppressing them by labelling them
as such, and that deafness was a 'cultural' experience. Apparently we (the
hearing
public, whether disabled in any way or not) are really
missing out by not being deaf and that this disability would vanish if we all
began signing with gusto in bus-queues, at the pub, at weddings, at
concerts or wherever.
Get real.
I found that deaf people were liable to get very stroppy
with hearing people, at several meetings the deaf people were verging on
beating up individuals in wheelchairs who were just trying to discuss
minor issues with them. This may be due to a huge inferiority complex or maybe
just because they can't hear, so they miss the subtle audible cues of
normal conversation and don't follow the pauses and murmers that are so
important for those using normal verbal languages.
The big joke is that while the deaf loudly moaned that they
weren't disabled, nevertheless they were more than happy to tick the
'disability' box and grab a piece of any funding that was going from the
disabled people's movement. I saw many piggy-back from the DPM into
jobs with serious money and perks with the local media, the BBC, and even as
spokespeople on 'disability' issues (!) for the Regional Arts Council in the
North East.
The latter incidentally was a clueless lesbian too.
