ITP Final Conflict revisited: FC 1797, 6th December 2001

TRUCKERS AND ASYLUM

At last a tiny glimpse of sanity appeared on the horizon of the view from the loony bin that is England. The Government LOST the right to impose fines on lorry drivers found with asylum seekers stowing away in their vehicles (at a rate of £2000 per criminal caught). This is indeed a good thing because it highlights the utterly disgraceful policy of the State letting aliens onto our shores, then persecuting our own people who have unwittingly been used by the same.

It is not the job of lorry drivers to protect our national borders, it is the job of the army. The solution to the problem of mass invasion at the ports is to bring our armed forces home from persecuting foreigners in their own lands (at the behest of other aliens) and to get them to do their duty: to defend our nation.

If these aliens persist in their attempts to invade our lands they should be treated in the time honoured fashion of being militarily repulsed. At the very least it would restore our fighting men's pride and give the fish a treat too!

Long Live (the real) Europe! Rufus.

p.s. The government is to appeal against the verdict - what do they say, Scum rises to the top!

UPDATE: The Government won their appeal and are even now crucifying truckers for the 'crime' of having their rigs invaded by violent criminals who will stop at nothing to get to the land of free housing, welfare payments, universal healthcare and despotic laws to silence anyone who might object to paying for his or her homeland to be given to people who only come here to steal from us. rape us and terrorise us.  The invasion is the fault of the scum in Paris who refuse to deport the invaders at Calais, the scum in London who criminalise thoughts in favour of indigenous rule for Europeans, the scum in Brussels who obey their owners (George Soros etc), and the entire Capitalist system which relies on cheap labour, high unemployment and social disharmony to thrive. But, the Truckers pay the price, and the invaders live the high life. 

ITP Final Conflict: FC 1570, 22nd February 2001 - The twisted 'pc' view on race attacks

ENGLAND: RACE ATTACKS.... THE SLANTED PC VIEW 

[Ed: Commentry outside brackets by FC regular Rufus]: 

ANTI-RACISM SHAM 
13th February 2001 
By Yasmin Alibhai-Brown 

'White man kills a black man, all hell breaks loose; 
black kills another black, it's an embarrassment' 

“Mention the possibility that violence between ethnic minorities may be as bad as white racism against black, and that such conflicts have been denied too long, and the so-called "ethnic minority leaders" will accuse you of everything from ignorance to irresponsibility. Yet that is the obvious and unspoken implication of a succession of recent assaults and murders, including that of Damilola Taylor 

“Nobody doubts that Damilola, a recent arrival from Nigeria, was victimised by gangs that included black British children. If he had been bullied by young white thugs and then found stabbed to death (allegedly) by one of the bullies, these same leaders would be doing the rounds, ferociously insisting that the crime was racially motivated and not the inevitable result of bad schools, violence in society and too many knives in circulation - the three explanations we have been given so far by various representatives and spokespeople in Peckham. 

“They insist that there is no problem between the various "black" communities in the area and that there has been a wonderful swell of renewed unity as a result of this terrible death. I remain sceptical. If this is true, why are the killers being sheltered by those who know them? 

“The same protection surrounded a gang of Asian and Afro-Caribbean youngsters who viciously attacked a group of Somali students in Southgate in North London in 1999. Bodrul Miah, an Asian, repeatedly stabbed 18-year-old Abdul Osman, a bright student at the local college. The gang members were convicted last month, but the police, local MP Stephen Twigg and the college principal still insist that ethnic difference was not a key motive for the attack. 

“Local Somalis beg to differ. One said to a reporter: 

"We believed it was a race murder. The Somalis are a different culture, a race apart, and they were picked on by the Asians. Nowadays when a white man kills a black all hell breaks loose; black kills another black and it is an embarrassment." 

“This weekend, news broke of Asian gangs in Oldham who have been attacking white people. Many anti-racists will find this even more of an embarrassment. In their eyes white people can only ever be perpetrators, never victims of anti-white violence. It is true that serious assaults are mostly committed by white thugs, and that white racist gangs have been as busy as ever, terrorising black, Asian, mixed-race, refugee and other groups. But we need to move our attention to the increasingly brutish behaviour of young men in other communities too. 

“In west London, particularly in higher education establishments, simmering rivalries periodically explode between Muslim and Sikh gangs, and these only ever get reported in the local papers such as the Ealing Gazette. A young Muslim female barrister tells me that the courts in Birmingham are full of Asian members of criminal gangs. A violent gangland culture is emerging across the races. 

“Gangs are not new in this society, nor is the violence associated with them. What is worrying is the spread of this behaviour. There isn't a single community that can afford to remain smug or superior. Gang members unite under a common identity, real or invented. So white kids beat up "Pakis", "chinks" and "black bastards", who in turn retaliate or victimise refugees 
or other newcomers. 

“Ethnicity is only one of the fault lines. You also get gang battles within groups, a point that well made by Home Office minister Paul Boateng, who this morning launches "Young, Gifted and Dead", a poster campaign in London's Harlesden area, where drug and turf wars have left eight black men dead in the past eight months. 

[Ed: no such campaigns where Whites are targeted???] 

“But whether it is interethnic rivalry or drug-related criminal activity, surely it is time to address these developments? We have a vast amount of credible research into race discrimination, but barely anything on these new problems. Funders are squeamish about such research because of fears that such information will make white racism worse. 

“First of all, white racists need no convincing that we are a thoroughly bad lot. Sure, right wingers will rush around "proving" that all social problems are caused by immigrants and their offspring. But they do this anyway, with or without evidence. The Home Office, universities and think tanks need to take bold decisions and begin some serious research that can then be used for social policies. 

[Ed: Oh, so now we have the evidence it is still Nationalists who get the blame!] 

“We need to know exactly what is going on, and to make the information public. The causes are likely to be multi-layered and diverse. These gangs flourish in places where, for years, all public amenities have been eroded by a market-led cuts. Oldham is one such area, as is Southall, where once there was a well equipped leisure centre (now a supermarket), youth clubs and cinemas. Maybe the young people are displaying tribal tendencies as a response to a homogenised world, and they are undoubtedly feeling the alienation of all young males who have little self-esteem or prospects. 

“In some Asian communities, economic deprivation used to be managed through strong family bonds. Asian families are more solid than many others in this country, but there are signs of disintegration and conflict. Third-generation Asian children are Thatcher's children; they cannot communicate with their parents, and seek out gangs to make new bonds. We must find out how racism and religious discrimination makes beasts of victims. 

“I remember a young Bangladeshi student of mine in Bethnal Green who was horribly mutilated by a gang of white neo-Nazis. After the attack, he became so violent himself that we had no option but to expel him. Black boys may be underachieving in schools partly because of an internalised sense of hopelessness, which they have picked up by observing how racism ground down their parents. And we may hate what they stand for, but we should invest more money in finding out more about the thoughts and lives of young white racist gangs too. 

[Ed: SEE! White racists are always to blame!] 

“This does not mean that I think we should busy ourselves understanding antisocial behaviour without passing judgements. We must condemn gang violence, and condemn it whatever ethnic group is involved. Unless we can weep equally for black and white victims of these outrages, our anti-racism is a sham.” 

For anyone who has never heard of the charming Ms Brown, she is an establishment leading light, married to a self-loathing Englishman. The language she uses would be illegal for a European but perfectly acceptable for an Asian. Perhaps the worst aspect of her article is that it treats the outrageous level of violence in Britain as normal ­ fifty years ago (even twenty) that would have been unheard of (I wonder what changed!) Still, at least someone is speaking out in the establishment media - even if with ‘forked-tongue’! 

ITP Final Conflict: FC1565, 16th February 2001 - The Big Issue scam

Whilst reading a copy of the Big Issue recently, I was struck by the irony of the ragazine’s (sic) pro-immigration stance. The writers consistently call for an end to the pathetic immigration controls we have. Fair enough ­ it is due to the laxist measures of the State that so many foreigners are flooding into Europe (and other lands). The government is kicking unemployed natives out of hostels to make room for the poor unloved newcomers. These people then proceed to sponge off the tax-payers whilst simultaneously working in the black economy. This forces businesses to cut wages and downsize operations (i.e. sack the workers). Matters are only made worse by positive discrimination measures leading to whites being replaced by blacks. All these things contribute to the rapid decline of the nation ­ and an increase in homelessness. 

So is the Big Issue calling for a halt to immigration and a resettlement of those aliens occupying our lands? Not quite. In typical lunatic fashion, the would-be Stalinists who spew forth their ideological claptrap in the pages of the rag are calling for no immigration controls at all! Then these deranged inarticulate imbeciles have the gall to pretend to be defenders of the homeless! 

Feel free to give to the genuinely needy if you wish to, but do not buy copies of the poisonous neo-Bolshevik Big Issue. The homeless need housing not Communist ranting. The only way we can house all our people (who want to be housed) is to bring to an end the Capitalist/Communist system which has created the problem in the first place. This necessitates removing non-Europeans from our shores, not bringing more in. Get a life Big Issue Commissars ­ you’re not helping and you’re not needed! 

ITP Final Conflict revisited: FC 1535, 8th January 2001 - Long Live the Slavs

I had the great opportunity to go to the Czech Republic for New Year and I can tell you all that the cold-war propaganda against our Slavic brethren was nothing but pure scare-mongering hatred and lies.

The Czech Republic along with all of the former 'eastern bloc' nations has been portrayed as a desperate crime-ridden dirty land. The reality is somewhat different. Unlike London and other 'western' cities, the cities of Prague and Brno are clean (albeit graffiti-covered), and the presence of uniformed Police on the beat no-doubt keeps crime levels down - but they are also civil (which makes a change!).

The night life is vibrant and excepting a couple of Cockney hooligans, I saw no trouble or even tension. I believe New Year in England was marred by several murders. The pubs and clubs have obviously been in place for a long time and therefore cannot be hailed as the result of the spirit of westernisation. In fact all that seems to have occurred in that direction is the invasion of multi-national despot corporations such as MacDonalds, hmm lovely (methinks not).

At the risk of going slavophile the people were surprising friendly. The only people who were hostile in any way were a few of the older generation who scurried away in fear when asked for directions in German. This is an unfortunate legacy of the Second World War and not unlike some British pensioners who loath foreigners is generally not shared by the younger generations. Incidentally, not many Czechs speak German and hardly any speak English, so it is worth any travellers going east at least learning a bit of basic Czech (or any other Russian-type language).

The festivities are somewhat different to what one might expect. To celebrate the New Year, the people go onto the streets and throw fireworks around! The authorities have ambulances and fire-engines in place just in case they are needed. What a change from the nanny-state control-freakery of the English establishment who only allow people access to fireworks on the anti-Catholic November Fifth festival. How refreshing for a people to be left to their own devices to take risks if they so desire. In the 12th Century night-club in Prague the bar staff set fire to the bar and floor (with Sambuca), at the height of the evening. Although impressive and not dangerous this would be forbidden back home. And WE are the people living in a free country?

Architecturally, Prague is a treat (although Brno is friendlier and less polluted by Capitalist Shysters). It was never bombed in the Wars and has been preserved in all it's splendour. The communist take-over is most visible on the religious buildings where statues have been removed. They remain no less impressive for all that. The perfectly preserved historic central synagogue is also worth seeing - and it begs the question as to the validity of German anti-Semitism (and I noticed THEIR icons remained un-defaced).........

If you truly want to do the movement a service you must educate yourself and free your mind from the years of lies you will have been exposed to. What more pleasurable way than by a holiday in a once forbidden land?

Happy New Year / Strazny Novy Rok ! Rufus.

ITP Final Conflict revisited: FC 1946/49, 24th/28th May 2002 - Tweedle Con and Tweedle Lab

TORY SCUM

The Conservative Party in the UK have long been a party of opportunists and liars. In the 1970s they jumped on the anti-immigration bandwagon and stole the votes which should have gone to the National Front. Once in power they, of course, reverted to type and let a substantial number of the world's featherless bipeds swarm into the nation to scrounge from the people, go on a monumental crime-spree and generally destroy our culture. Thanks!

Now it seems they are sensing a growing desire on behalf of the remnants of the indigenous population for Social Justice. They have declared that they want to see grass-root politics with the local people forming residents' associations to deal with their own problems. Basically they are advocating community politics and individual responsibility free from the overbearing beast of central government. Great stuff - the Third Position has arrived in the Tory ranks, (hasn't it?) Actually, the Tories are trying yet again to pull the wool over the people's eyes. Their version of Social Justice emphasises the rights of minorities (and I don't think they mean the Europeans left in Inner London!), alongside an international free-trade system. Indeed their policy is Social Justice without National Freedom. As one cannot exist without the other, their idea is simply rhetoric disguising a lie. The mongrel Ian Duncan Smith (his grandfather bought his Geisha grandmother!) is a typical statist hypocrite.

The only possible salvation for Europe is for the people to reject the establishment and ACT to bring about change, by any means necessary. Will the 'British' ever learn that the Lib-Lab-Con is simply that - a con? If they won't we are doomed. It's our job to persuade them. How? By doing whatever it takes and showing our people (and the parasite foreigners) we mean business. In the past we could have migrated en masse, this we can no longer do. Failure is not an option. Long live the National Revolution!

....

LABOUR SCUM

Tony Blair, the arch traitor who pretends to be an Anglican but imposes the will of the anti-Christ, has declared that there will be a new vivisection camp built in Cambridge.

The local population are opposed to this, as should be every decent right thinking human being. Vivisection is simply pointless cruelty. So not only is Blair imposing his (master's) will over the people (how democratic!), but he is ignoring basic scientific facts also. Animal research is fundamentally flawed. The treatments which are found to help animals very rarely can be used on humans.

So what, if Vivisection cannot work, is the solution? We have prisons full of evil perverts and other semi-human refuse. The squeamish may bleat about human rights (which are merely an illusion), but must face up to the fact that testing on humans is the only way to develop treatment for humans. It is debatable as to the worth of developing drugs at all, but if they must be made, let the research be valid. A side-effect (no pun intended) would be to provide a very strong deterrent against crimes such as rape. 

Criminals today know they will get a cushy sentence, often living more comfortably than morally upstanding people. If they knew that to commit an abhorrent offence would result in them being handed over to scientist, they might think twice!

This is unfortunately mere dreaming. To make it possible we first need to gain control over our lands. When we have control we will deal harshly with those who have oppressed us. - Tony Blair, your valuable contribution to scientific research will be legendary!

Let's make it happen!

ITP Final Conflict revisited: FC 1937, 14th May 2002 - The Devolution Hoax

FREE TO CHOOSE YOUR POISON

The following is an item from Reuters(London) 9.5.2:

The government sets out its plans on Thursday to allow every region of

England to decide whether or not it wants its own parliament. The proposals,

which follow devolution of power to Scotland and Wales, will offer each

region a referendum on electing its own local powerbase.

"We're talking about devolving power from the centre, decentralising

government, not duplicating government," former senior government minister

Peter Mandelson - a strong proponent of regional assemblies - said on

Thursday.

"We have one of the most centralised systems of government anywhere in

Europe," he told BBC radio. "And I think that as a result it is less

accountable...less effective and less trusted by the people."

Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott has said the creation of regional

assemblies in England - expected to be modelled on the Greater London

Assembly headed by mayor Ken Livingstone - would be completion of a

"political dream" started with the devolution for Scotland, Wales and in

some part, Northern Ireland. Opposition Conservatives are sceptical about

the plans. They claim the assemblies will simply create yet another layer of

government and bureaucracy, rather than giving any real power to local

people. But Mandelson insisted a regional parliament would be a "tightly-

knit, focused, regional authority which will play the role of strategist,

advocate, catalyst and policy manager in those regions where the people want

it." The new assemblies would be designed to be streamlined and

non-bureaucratic and should focus on economic development, jobs and

investment, he said.

This is yet another con-trick to get more faceless bureaucrats in positions of power. Are the people that gullible after the farcical devolution in Cymru and London to swallow this? Of course they are - that's why its on offer! Notice also that all the moves towards so-called devolution are not modelled on the historical and cultural pre-English nations, but on the Euro-regions from the new Kremlin in Brussels. It is a fact that England is over-centralised and that we need devolution. However, the rationale behind these moves is not one of compassion and a sense of justice - no, it is merely a ploy to divide our nation so it may be more easily devoured and destroyed by the Leviathan of the New World Order.

Devolution without freedom is pointless - We must break free from "Euroslavia" (to borrow a term from Sunic) before we consider restoring ancient borders within a federal England. (All Europe should be wary of this political sleight of hand). That's democracy - you can choose whatever you like, so long as the powers-that-be have allowed the choices onto the menu in the first place. 

Democracy - a system whereby the dregs from the bottom rise to become the scum at the top!

ITP Final Conflict revisited: FC 1931/5, 6th/10th May 2002 - Boycott the Capitalist Daily Express

The following article is from the Hitchen column of the Daily Express,Friday 3.5.2:

'THANK the Lord, Joan Bakewell, who faces a potential prison sentence for reciting the blasphemous poem The Love That Dares To Speak Its Name on her explicit TV series Taboo, has received support from a surprising quarter. When the poem, which portrays Jesus as a sexually active gay man, was last published in 1976 in Gay News the editor was fined and given a suspended jail sentence for blasphemous libel. "Happily I am getting support from a formidable group of Christians," writes Joan, 69, in the New Statesman. "The General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches has written to tell me of a resolution passed recently that it deplores the threat to bring charges against Joan Bakewell... and calls upon Her Majesty's Government, the Scottish Executive and the Welsh Assembly to repeal the blasphemy laws." Hear Hear.'

That the trendy Red rag, the New Statesman, is pushing the campaign to legalise blasphemy (and logically Satanism) comes as no surprise. That Hitchen should throw his hat into the fold is equally predictable. However what kind of Christian can support the opening of the flood gates to all manner of anti-Christian evil? Obviously it is no kind of Christian, rather it is a pathetic clique of liberals and their more purposeful masters. I notice no claim for such treachery has been made upon the Assembly for Northern Ireland (through sheer cowardice), or the Islamic Parliament of Great Britain - I wonder why not?!

...

Today is the last day I will ever but a copy of the Daily Express. This nasty little gutter tabloid has consistently praised all attempts to wreck European Culture, and has opposed anyone who speaks out in its defence.

This week they have bombarded their readers' with invention and lies, (regarding the local elections in England and the Presidential election in France), masquerading the propaganda onslaught as honest coverage. Rosie Boycott has long been an enemy of all that is decent in Europe. Even the Taliban were so sickened by her decadent rantings that they sent her back to England. They would have been perfectly justified to execute her for spying, but did not. Pity.

As Nationalists (of whatever branch) we need to expose these establishment liars for what they are. They have signed their own death warrants for treason on many occasions in the pages of their sordid rags. The dilemma for us is how to undermine their power. We need to study what they write and pass the information onto all appropriate groups. For example, if they attack the pro-lifers, Church, Nationalist movement, anti-fag groups, etc whilst supporting our mutual enemies, pass that information on to the people concerned. This would naturally require the reading of such rubbish - and obtaining the papers in the first place. Ironically we would be paying our enemies to churn out lies against us. It would be wrong to advocate stealing the papers as a means of hitting them in the pocket, so I won't do that - but some way has to be found to get the info which we can use to expose them, without financing them. Individuals should decide how this can best be done.

We need a coherent strategy for weakening our enemies. The Supermarkets which are wrecking our towns all compete with one another by using "loss-leaders". The basic idea is people will be attracted by the cheapest goods (sold at a loss) and buy the more expensive goods whilst in the shop, thus generating profit. We could take advantage of this by bulk-buying the loss-leaders and refusing to purchase anything else. (Other goods should be bought from small retailers, thus boosting the indigenous economy). The best way to fight Capitalism is to deprive it of its life blood - Profit.

We are few. An economic boycott by ourselves only would change nothing. This sadly is true. We must encourage everyone we know to act likewise. People can be spurred on to action quite easily if they know they will save money doing so. This may be an appeal to the base financial motive but it is a realistic one. We aren't going to bring Capitalism to its knees overnight, but I for one intend to do everything I can to get the process going. For a start this means refusing to give our self-chosen masters any more tribute than the least possible.

If you need medicine, avoid the designer label trap. All medicines have a generic substitute which is exactly the same apart from the label. Generic medicines also cost about 1/3 the price of the brand names. The same goes for food stuffs. A packet of shop brand cereal will cost a fraction of the designer equivalent, but will be the same. Most of these goods are made in a batches by the same people - the product doesn't change, only the packaging. The list could go on to include building materials, clothes and any other products.

Do your bit. Shop very carefully - hit them where it hurts. Encourage everyone you know to do likewise. You needn't even mention politics, as the promise of saving money will tend to do the trick! This is the very least we must all be doing.

[Ed: A boycott of THE EXPRESS would be easy to organise - especially targeting liberals and reds - which the rag is hoping to pick up with its 'anti-fascist' agenda - because the paper's publisher is Richard Desmond who also publishes numerous pornographic magazines. That's something the 'Christian Right' and the 'Feminist Left' - to use labels! - finds distasteful, and so we have a wide range of people who should avoid the rag.

 As an aside, it was the Sunday Express who published a string of articles - with the help of Gerry Gable of Searchlight - attacking the International Third Position; and which Nick Griffin of the BNP was keen to speak to, to attack the ITP in print. What would his response be if that happened the other way around? Moral indignation no doubt!]