Recently I have been posting examples of items written for various political organisations. The reason for this is that I have been active for a considerable time, and I have seen the decline of the quality and direction of political parties in the UK over that time.
I first ventured out into the political realm as a young lad when I wandered into a CND meeting by pure chance. I consider it irresponsible of the particular CND organisers to have allowed children into showings of films depicting death and destruction. The lack of respect for the right of children to be children shews an arrogant dedication to getting out propaganda at any cost, which goes beyond what is acceptable and into the dark area of child abuse.
The lack of respect for children is something which seems to be quite pervasive in the UK, with 'youth' sections of political organisations pushing propaganda mercilessly on children who should be left in peace from the harsh realities of the adult world. However, the social engineering programmes of the school system, teaching children in primary schools sex education focussed on hedonism rather than biology, or in pro-Globalist propaganda in so-called religious education, or in the endless guilt-tripping of children into donating for so-called refugees etc, is even sicker (and certainly slicker) than the amateur propagandising of those outside the Establishment. The bombardment of children with imagery designed to manipulate them emotionally into conforming with any ideology is nothing short of 'grooming', used in exactly the same way as paedophiles (child-rapists) groom children to accept their disgusting lusts. Sadly, the political parties in the UK are not immune to child-raping scum in their midst, and most worryingly, are less concerned with exposing such vermin and kicking them out of politics, than they are covering up for them to keep the 'party' reputation intact. But more of that later in this post.
My first foray into active politics was when I joined the English National Party, which was a very small organisation headed by a man who would have not stood out in the Conservative Party and his co-leader who would not have stood out in the Revolutionary Workers Party! The potential for splits was obvious, and it surprised nobody when the 'Tory boy' emigrated to start a new life in circumstances less kind people would refer to as an odyssey of race-mixing and materialistic hedonism. I won't name any of the people in the ENP, as to do so would cause needless problems. The end of the dual leadership with the departure of the 'tory boy' saw the ENP oddly continue as a strange blend of reactionaries and radicals. The membership was multi-racial, multi-religious and multi-ideological! I began writing politically during this period, contributing to the ENP newsletter, 'the Voice'. The ENP drifted into a period of purism, with the Hindu and Muslim members dropping out. This was used as an excuse to adopt recruitment policy which barred non-Europeans from entry, although it never had to be enforced, as no one who would have had to be rejected attempted to join! The ENP was somewhat anarchic, with Capitalist rubbing shoulders with Communists, with Theists rubbing shoulders with Atheists. It was more of a community than a rigid party. The ENP slogan, 'England First' was adopted by the ITP in England, but before it could be registered, was stolen by Mark Cotterill for his 'England First Party'. The ENP was a good place to exchange ideas, and didn't suffer from any of the usual nonsense of people wanting to be kings and queens of the castle. The great strength of the ENP was that it was a community of ideas, not a plaything of wannabe dictators - which to my dismay, just about every other organisation across the political spectrum, does seem to be.
Following a violent racist attack, I joined the BNP. I had the pleasure of meeting a range of interesting people, including John Tyndall. I stayed in the BNP for a short time, getting to know the next leader, Nick Griffin, who commissioned me to write the party's economic policy, although nothing came of my work. I suspect my efforts were too radical for the BNP, which was moving in a very conventional economic direction, no matter what its enemies would like to have claimed. I worked alongside the International Third Position around this time, getting to know the key figures, who had been comrades of Nick Griffin. My meanderings brought me into contact with the remnants of the English Nationalist Movement, Third Way, Green Army Faction, National Revolutionary Faction, Alternative Green and Third Turn.
Of all of the organisations I came in contact with, it was the ITP and ENM which most closely fitted my political outlook, and it was the ITP alone which I became active with. The cosy contradictions of the ENP had obviously primed me for easy collaborations with organisations which ranged from Anarchist to Communist to Liberal to Conservative. The antipathy of the ITP to the various vehicles of Troy Southgate, was due to him being a 'fingers in pies merchant', and it was a real shame that the ENM didn't develop into a strong party of the Left, which would have been a home for Patriotic Socialists. Unbeknownst to me at the time, there are just as many parties on the Left as there are on the Right, and the politics of the ENM are very well represented to this day, although I am not aware of any of the ENM members still being active.
My journey took a strange turn when I moved into circles which focused more upon the past than on the need to secure the future, and on the past of a foreign country at that! I was friends with a few activists in Leeds, and in the pursuit of helping the ITP to push intelligent politics into the mainstream Right, I moved into the orbit of the White Nationalist Party, which then changed its name to the British Peoples Party, and finally merged itself into the rump of the National Front. I wrote editorially for the BPP, and produced the infamous Pixie Watch series for them. Pixie Watch was created to poke fun at political correctness. I had written a few humorous columns for the ENP newspaper, the 'Voice'. Pixie Watch carried on in that tradition. Oddly, Pixie Watch was to be instrumental in bringing the BPP down. I wrote a piece ridiculing body size, but it was interpreted as a personal attack on fat women (which it wasn't), and a leading female member of the BPP went apoplectic, with the result that my old friend, Eddy Morrison, was booted out of the BPP for the offence of asking me to create the Pixie Watch series! The offending article can be found at this link: http://pixiewatch.blogspot.co.uk/2008/08/food-for-thought-pw05.htmlThe end of my involvement with the BPP wasn't helped by a couple of articles I wrote on this very blog, attacking the disgusting paedophile and potential terrorist, Martyn Gilleard. I demanded that he be expelled from the BPP and that the party publicly declare that scum like him were not welcome in the ranks. I was reprimanded for airing the BPP's dirty laundry in public, and to my regret, removed the first and most important article in which I had stated the refusing to expel Gilleard was akin to covering up for and even endorsing the rape of children and the use of murder as a political tool. Eventually, Gilleard was expelled from the BPP, although not soon enough. As I wrote in the Final Conflict blog in a reply to the article of the 16th August 2008:
"Nationalism without morality and principles is a gift for the enemies of the nation. How can we possibly build a better world for our respective peoples if we are ourselves as degenerate as those we seek to replace?
The Gilleard monster was thrown out of the BPP as soon as he admitted he was a paedophile [but not until he chose to own up to his sickness, even though the evidence was available]. Sadly his pretensions towards being some kind of race warrior were not taken as reason to boot him out! No one can seriously believe terrorism is a viable and moral option. Was the BPP not expelling a wannabe terrorist an oversight? With the recent cuddling up to the loyalist BFF & RVF (!) that may be an expression of unrealistic idealism. I pray I am wrong.
Worse than the BPP's reaction, the NF have STILL not banned this beast. The leadership of the NF are loyalists, royalists and imperialists. This shows an unbelievable failure to grasp current political reality. Rubbing shoulders with the likes of Gilleard is beyond belief.
Our struggle must be to remold ourselves into better people so that we are worthy to lead our people out of the cesspool of the modern mamonist world. We must truly be Political Soldiers.
Narrow Nationalism which plays the parliamentary game is an irrelevance. The vast majority of laws in Britain are made in Brussels or in committees with no recourse to a parliamentary vote. Our fight is against the apparatus of the New World Order - this is not a battle which respects, or even recognises, national borders.
The 9/11 lie must be exposed for what it is - an international act of aggression by the rulers against the ruled. Those who say 9/11 was an inside job are only partly right. It was a Zionist NWO job with cooperation across many nations - likewise with the atrocities in London, Madrid etc.
The Global Warming lie must be even more fervently fought against - this is the excuse the rulers are using to bring in a global tax to fund the One World Government.
We need to educate ourselves and then spread this knowledge. However we must not allow our enemies into our camp in order to boost membership numbers. That can only lead to us becoming the new 'them'. We must be constantly on our guard against replacing our masters at the cost of becoming them, as warned of by Orwell in Animal Farm."
I continued to support Eddy Morrison when he took his organisation into the National Front, after I was assured that the likes of Gilleard were not welcome. I wrote a few pieces for them, edited their magazine, continued the Pixie Watch series on their behalf, and helped out in other ways. I helped to push the NF in a more positive direction, with radical economics and a move away from petty imperial chauvinism. My travels across what would be termed the 'far right' (although the ENP and ITP really shouldn't be classed as such) brought me into contact with some very interesting people, and with a range of political ideology and desired tactics. Most of the people were sincere and decent, some were neither.
I have seen a steady decline in the number of activists in political formations. The usual routine is for people to join a party, get disillusioned with the leadership, then get poached by a rival organisation fighting pretty much the same territory, and repeat this until thoroughly fed up with the ceaseless point-scoring of people who claim to be fighting for their country, (but spend more effort and time fighting rival patriotic factions) drop out entirely. People go around the spiral, meeting the same faces, hearing the same rhetoric about 'unity' (under the leadership of whichever organisation they are dealing with at the time!), until they realise that the leaders don't really want to lead the country out of misery, but rather the leaders just want to be leaders, and to hell with the people!
In recent years, with the arrival (and departure) of the EDL, and with increasingly more obvious State involvement in organisations, a more sinister thing than egoism has become dominant in the far right. The newer formations are now almost exclusively State set ups, and the older ones are pretty much all compromised in one way or another.
The recent bye-election in Batley and Spen for the appointment of another Labour MP (and two fingers up to the democratic process) highlighted the stupidity of the factionalism in the alleged patriotic and nationalist arena. Rather than stand one candidate under a common label, no less than five rival factions contested the seat, (ED, BNP, EI, LGB, NF), each giving the UK government £500 of their members money for a pointless exercise in self humiliation. If they had bothered to communicate with one another, they would have saved £2000 between them and had all the patriotic voters voted for the unity candidate, they would still have lost their deposit, but maybe - just maybe - they would have gained votes from more people as the futility of wasting one's vote would have been lessened if only one patriotic candidate was standing, and not five splitting that area of the vote.
I have a history in the nationalist scene. I know (and have known) many of the key players. I have created a selection of archives of various groups, to show that I am not a fly by night activist, but someone who knows what I am on about. Why? Because the current nationalist arena is a controlled operation, with the uncontrolled parts being led by hobbyists and egomaniacs who make a living from pandering to the fears of the members. This is allowing for the enemies of freedom to go unopposed. Its time to expose the snakes in the movement and to upset the apple cart. This will offend a lot of people who are cosy in the delusion of rebellion. Good! If we want to get our sovereignty and freedom back, we have to sweep away the detritus which is getting in the way, and which worse than this, is posing as the forces of revolution!
But, more of that to follow...
I have seen a steady decline in the number of activists in political formations. The usual routine is for people to join a party, get disillusioned with the leadership, then get poached by a rival organisation fighting pretty much the same territory, and repeat this until thoroughly fed up with the ceaseless point-scoring of people who claim to be fighting for their country, (but spend more effort and time fighting rival patriotic factions) drop out entirely. People go around the spiral, meeting the same faces, hearing the same rhetoric about 'unity' (under the leadership of whichever organisation they are dealing with at the time!), until they realise that the leaders don't really want to lead the country out of misery, but rather the leaders just want to be leaders, and to hell with the people!
In recent years, with the arrival (and departure) of the EDL, and with increasingly more obvious State involvement in organisations, a more sinister thing than egoism has become dominant in the far right. The newer formations are now almost exclusively State set ups, and the older ones are pretty much all compromised in one way or another.
The recent bye-election in Batley and Spen for the appointment of another Labour MP (and two fingers up to the democratic process) highlighted the stupidity of the factionalism in the alleged patriotic and nationalist arena. Rather than stand one candidate under a common label, no less than five rival factions contested the seat, (ED, BNP, EI, LGB, NF), each giving the UK government £500 of their members money for a pointless exercise in self humiliation. If they had bothered to communicate with one another, they would have saved £2000 between them and had all the patriotic voters voted for the unity candidate, they would still have lost their deposit, but maybe - just maybe - they would have gained votes from more people as the futility of wasting one's vote would have been lessened if only one patriotic candidate was standing, and not five splitting that area of the vote.
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour | Tracy Brabin | 17,506 | 85.8 | +42.6 | |
| English Democrats | Therese Hirst | 969 | 4.8 | N/A | |
| BNP | David Furness | 548 | 2.7 | N/A | |
| Independent | Garry Kitchin | 517 | 2.5 | N/A | |
| English Independence | Corbyn Anti | 241 | 1.2 | N/A | |
| Liberty GB | Jack Buckby | 220 | 1.1 | N/A | |
| Independent | Henry Mayhew | 153 | 0.8 | N/A | |
| Independent | Waqas Ali Khan | 118 | 0.6 | N/A | |
| National Front | Richard Edmonds | 87 | 0.4 | N/A | |
| One Love Party | Ankit Love | 34 | 0.2 | N/A | |
But, more of that to follow...
