ThirdEyeWise on the Nazi Jews

by ThirdEyeWise

There seems to be a mass deception going on with the fanatical Hitler cult. These people expect you to tow the line and will accuse you of being deceitful if you do not. The forum administrator over at TIU deleted my last post and banned me (2nd time) for revealing certain truths concerning the Nazi party. 

Anyway, have a read:
http://theinfounderground.com/forum/vie ... =7&t=17230


Also, here is a video I made concerning the topic. yeah, yeah, I know I'm no Steven Spielberg  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGLhhHu1Kig

http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/dna ... s-1.309938


I think he definitely had Jewish lineage but to me it really does not matter. The most important thing is that he definitely was a Freemason (as proven by those pictures) and that Hjalmar Schacht was also a Freemason and an acknowledged Rothschild agent. Freemasonry is a Jewish institution and all Freemasons in essence work for the Rothschilds. That is all the proof we need to show that the Nazi party was actually controlled opposition. Anyone who understands how these people operate knows that there is no other explanation. Don't expect these Nazi cultists to admit to anything. Remember they are a cult and cults aren't exactly known for thinking rationally. 

The guy that was supposedly getting rid of the Jews had more Jews working for him than the Obama administration...I mean come on, how much more obvious can it get!

I find it ironic that we are still discussing whether Hitler was working with the Jews in light of the copious amount of evidence proving that he was. I have to wonder about the level of intelligence one has to have to believe people like William Finck or prothink over proven and credible researchers like as Eustace Mullins, Douglas Reed or Juri Lina. It's pretty damn mind blowing to tell you the truth. The pictures of the Freemasonic handshakes alone should have ended this argument as soon as they came to light. Yet, here we are still talking about it. I mean people do realize that there are Jews and Freemasons all over these discussion forums trying to stop people from understanding how these historical dots connect,...right? 

"Every step of Nazism was financed by wall street bankers." - Eustace Mullins

"Therefore I conjectured that this man-from-nowhere might in truth be the accomplice of Communism and Political Zionism, two forces which have always supported each other. His 'Fascism' thus seemed to me to be merely the third prong of one trident, with which the cauldron of our century is kept stirred." - Douglas Reed's Somewhere South of Suez, 1951, pages 179-181

"Fascism is nothing but another form of the Fabian socialism for which the freemasons laid the foundation." - Juri Lina, Architects of Deception, Pg 259
http://loveforlife.com.au/files/SecreHi ... ry2004.pdf

"How shall I know you to be a Mason?"
His answer: "By certain signs, a token, a word, and the perfect points of my entrance."
Then, when he is asked, "What are tokens?,"
he replies: "Certain friendly or brotherly grips, by which one Mason may know another in the dark as well as in the light." - Duncan's Masonic Ritual and Monitor, p. 42

 
 
 
 




I mean for God's sake Hitler used a damn Rothschild agent and other Jewish bankers to rebuild Germany's broken economy into a war based one (for further banker profits). 


Doing the "V" symbol

“I am no National Socialist, but the basic ideas of National Socialism contain a great deal of truth.” - Hjalmar Schacht (so says the freemason and Rothschild agent)

“And by 1938, Schacht was publicly calling the Nazis ''criminals'' and attacking the persecution of Jews (a mason setting up the Jewish persecution story) in a Christmas speech to employees of the Reichsbank. Hitler tolerated this defiance because of Schacht's importance to the economy, but Schacht still was running a huge personal risk. By 1943, when Hitler formally dismissed him from the government…”

http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blog ... nkers.html

“What is going on, is, the grand Nazi scheme. There is only one political party in the world today and that’s called the Nazis” – Eustace Mullins

Ever heard the saying "Show Me Your Friends, And I’ll Tell You Who You Are"?.....

Perhaps most stunning of all, however, is Hamann's description of Hitler's numerous Jewish friends and business associates during his Vienna days, at least one of whom later appealed to him directly after the Anschluss, just as the good Dr Bloch had done. We will no longer be able to think of Hitler in Vienna without thinking of his Jewish friend, Josef Neumann, who sold his paintings, the Galician Jew Jakob Altenberg and the Hungarian Jew Samuel Morgenstern, both of them dealers who paid him a decent price, or of the Jahodas, the cultivated upper-middle-class Jewish couple whose company Hitler enjoyed on a few occasions.
http://www.talmudterror.com/jakobhitler.htm
http://www.younghitler.com/hitlers_jewish_friends.htm

Dr. Robert G. L. Waite wrote the afterword for Langer’s The Mind of Adolf Hitler. A psychoanalytical historian at Brown University, Waite noted that Hitler had benefited from Jewish philanthropy and kindness throughout his life, including after he became dictator.
http://redroom.com/member/frank-sanello ... 0%99t-hate

Hitler’s Jewish Girlfriend
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... riend.html

Bernile Nienau…Hitlers frequent Jewish visitor at his retreat
http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/Irving/RadDi/2007/301207.html

Hitler’s Jewish psychic
http://forward.com/articles/145806/stra ... hic/?p=all

Former Jewish maid breaks her silence on Adolf Hitler. 
http://thisiszionism.blogspot.com/2008/ ... ewish.html

Hitler's Jewish cook

When SS chief Heinrich Himmler objected that a Jew shouldn’t be preparing the Fuehrer’s food, Hitler screamed at an adjutant, “Aryanize the Kunde family!”
http://redroom.com/member/frank-sanello ... 0%99t-hate

Hitler's sister the Jews' "kosher cook"
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blog ... 6bddd1a7c0

Hitler's Jewish dietician

During the trial testimony for the week of Feb. 21 the court learned that Hitler's dietician, Marlene Exner, was Jewish, as was Hitler's onetime chauffeur, Emil Maurice.
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/libeltrial6.html

Hitler's Jewish bodyguards

"When Hitler learned that his chauffeur Emil Maurice was in fact Jewish, in 1939, he signed an Aryan certificate to spare him from Nazi persecution or worse. . .
http://mk.christogenea.org/content/emil ... ile-driver
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2263867/j ... l_maurice/

YouTube: HITLER'S (last) Personal Bodyguard had a Jewish Wife!!! 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0J7_GEHhAA
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8237708.stm
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blog ... -nazi.html

Hitler's favorite Jew: The strange case of Dr. Eduard Bloch
http://open.salon.com/blog/lost_in_berl ... uard_bloch

Hitler's half-Jewish personal physician, Dr. Theodor Morell

http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blog ... octor.html

Apparently Hitler hated sharp objects near his throat

http://books.google.com/books?id=-rQn6P ... 9D&f=false


Unless of course it was an orthodox Jew holding the blade

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/artic ... 59,00.html

Hitler's Record Collection Included Jewish Artists
http://abcnews.go.com/International/sto ... VTC-JO-kl8

Hitler Jewish DNA: Tests Show Dictator May Have 'Had Jewish And African Roots (African as in the Berbers, who were converts to Judaism and became what were known as Sephardic Jews)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/2 ... 93568.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... eveal.html

The man responsible for recommending Hitler for the award of the Iron Cross was the regimental adjutant, Captain Hugo Guttman, a Jew.
(It’s kind of how Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize from his Jewish cronies in preparation for bigger things)
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthre ... 2056233242 
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... m-pig.html

Hitler Protected Jewish Vet During World War II
http://www.webpronews.com/hitler-protec ... ii-2012-07


There were even Jews named Cohen (as in the priestly lineage) serving in Hitler’s war machine

“For example, a horrible situation developed when lieutenant Joachim Cohen visited his Jewish father at Sachsenhausen in 1943 while on leave. The perplexed camp commander could not understand how Cohen could be a decorated Panzer officer.”
- Hitler’s Jewish soldiers, pg 141

Thanks to the late Rabbi Menachem M. Schneerson, Chabad Lubavitch is a well-known and powerful Hasidic movement. But few people know that the rebbe's predecessor, Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Schneerson, owes his life to a half-Jewish Nazi officer acting under the direct order of the head of the Third Reich's military intelligence agency.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/fe ... e-1.359059

Jewish Fascist Italy
http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index ... ic=13462.0



and now Jews everywhere promote global Fascism

http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2 ... 3_feat.pdf

"His (God's) intention will be realized through bloody struggles, wars and revolutions; the present social order will be destroyed together with all institutions that are bound up with the present social order. State capitalism and fascism will take the place of the present social order." - Rabbi Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and Humanity,

But the Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that, just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism." 
- Rabbi Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and Humanity, pp. 143-144.

No matter where you go with this Nazi story you are bound to run into one Jew and then another and another.



There were full blooded Jews in charge of Nazi propaganda


And Nazis named Oppenheimer


Do you know the history of the Oppenheimer family? They were the ones who took in a young apprentice named Meyer Amschel Bauer (later Rothschild) and taught him everything
there was to know about money and financing.
http://www.redicecreations.com/specialr ... hield.html

The Nazis were giving out "Aryan" certificates like it was Halloween candy.

\“My thoughts are 100% hebraic” – Ludwig Wittgenstein (bottom right)

The tyrannical family patriarch was Karl Wittgenstein (1847-1913), a steel, banking and arms magnate.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/books ... d=all&_r=0 


Thanks to Karl (left), the Wittgensteins became the second wealthiest family in the Habsburg Empire, behind only the Rothschilds. The whole Wittgenstein family (minus Karl; already dead), one of the most influential Jewish family in all of Germany became “Aryanized”


http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=iy ... 9%2C801775

Tell me, who reimburses a people that is accused of stealing from the very country who you claim to be representing?
The whole Nazi story is just another Jewish persecution tale that they came up with themselves and whose leadership they controlled.

Bilderberg was set up by Prince Bernhard (of Lippe-Biesterfeld) of the Netherlands who 'once wore the black uniform of Hitler’s SS' according to Alden Hatch, author of 'H. R. H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands; an authorized biography'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Ber ... iesterfeld

This Masonic connection explains why Hitler and the Nazis killed an anti-masonic priest whose life work was aimed at exposing people like Hitler.

The saintly Maximilian Kolbe was a Catholic priest who ran a a large media network dedicated to exposing Judaism and Freemasonry. From Europe to Asia, his vast printing empire churned out literature educating Judaics and gentiles alike about the evils of Judaism and the masonic movement. In Japan, he established a center at Nagasaki. In Poland, he was seized and imprisoned by the Nazis in Auschwitz and killed there (by lethal injection). After the Nazis murdered Kolbe, the American government made certain to finish the job, by choosing to detonate a second atomic bomb on none other than the city of Nagasaki, a citadel of Christianity in Asia, and headquarters of Kolbe's media center in the Far East. Thus was extinguished, by the combined malevolence of the Axis forces of Hitler and the Allied forces of President Truman, an important modern Christian mission. —Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, pp. 650

And it also explains why the majority of people interned in the concentration camps were actually Christian Germans and not Jews as it is claimed in mainstream history books

Time magazine, December 23, 1940, reports that 80% of Nazi concentration camp prisoners are not Jewish, but Christian.
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blog ... 0a5959998c

As Douglas Reed explains the Jews use Misdirection, smoke and mirrors techniques and crafty word play (magic) to mislead.

"I earlier described, with illustrations from Jewish sources, the process by means of which, over the years, the Jews were "singled out" from the mass of Hitler's victims and their number inflated at will from day to day (Hitler's book-bonfire became"the burning of Jewish books"; his concentration camps where ninety percent of the inmates were Germans became concentration camps for Jews; a wartime report about the killing of" 150,000 White Russians, Ukrainians and Jews at Kieff" was changed to "150,000 Jews";and so on interminably).
My opinion is that, whatever was the number of Jews in the countries overrun by Hitler, the number of their victims was in roughly that proportion to the total population stricken, Polish, Czech and other.
I have found this to be the opinion of all persons known to me who survived the concentration camps and occupations. Having suffered themselves, their feeling for Jewish victims was as strong as for all others, but they could not understand why the one case of the Jews was singled out and the number of Jewish victims monstrously exaggerated."
- Douglas Reed (The Controversy of Zion: The Strange Role of the Press)

This Masonic connection also explains why the Nazis went out of their way to put this now infamous Illuminati symbol on a poster:

thirdeyewise wrote:No matter where you go with this Nazi story you are bound to run into one Jew and then another and another.

Bormann’s secretary: Russian Jewess spy helped defeat Hitler
http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index ... ic=16871.0
http://www.jweekly.com/includes/print/1 ... ay-at-jcc/ 

Bormann's wife: started a Jewish orphanage

"his wife, Gerda, whom he married in 1929, opened a nursery home for Jewish orphans in Bavaria in 1945"
http://spitfirelist.com/books/manning.pdf(pg 18)

The commandos accompanying Bormann on his escape had no idea of his identity. Many were Jewish "freedom fighters." What an irony! (yeah, the irony!…  )
http://www.henrymakow.com/martin_borman ... child.html

http://archive.jta.org/article/1930/12/ ... verted-jew


http://archive.jta.org/article/1936/11/ ... d-in-reich


The anti-Masonic Nazi in his Masonic uniform



"No, I am not a Jew. I just look like one…that’s all." - Adolf Eichmann (sarcasm)


"So I said shema...so what. I said it because I know Hebrew…that’s all." - Adolf Eichmann (sarcasm)

“In fact some Jews themselves even claim that there should be a statue to Adolf Hitler in Israel because he created the state of Israel…which is absolutely true, without Adolf Hitler Israel woud not exist” - Eustace Mullins

Hitler: First of the two Jewish Messiahs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5XFx4VKisA

In the video below @21:55 “People who are in the know tell me that when you go into these collection catalogs for Nazi memorobilia & Nazi relics, that the number of Jewish customers on there is astonishing…perhaps it’s a fetish (for Jews)” – Michael Hoffman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxsHMt9mkxE



http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html

If you want to understand some key aspects of crypto-Judaism, I suggest reading this book:

thirdeyewise wrote:No matter where you go with this Nazi story you are bound to run into one Jew and then another and another.

http://gooring.tripod.com/goo47.html


The man who said “I decide who is an Aryan” lived with his Jewish millionaire godfather/stepfather


Goring lived in this lavished castle:



While the average German (goy) lay on the brink of starvation


The Goring family were converted Jews who now called themselves "Christians", simply as a cover to hide their true Hebraic mindset. 
This explains their reembracement of Judaism and the Jewish welcoming of supposedly ex-Nazis into the Judaic bosom. 
Does anyone really think that the revenge based mindset of Judaism would actually welcome descendants of real Germans who they consider their ancestral enemies.


"Matthias Göring has discovered a love for all things Jewish."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 68677.html


Bettina Göring, a descendent of Hermann Göring, lives in Santa Fe, New Mexico where she practices herbal medicine. 
Her neighbors on either side are Jewish, and because they are constantly quarreling with one another, she is often called in to use her charm and humor to reconcile them. 
Who would have thought sixty years ago that a Göring would use ‘charm and humor’ to resolve the differences between feuding Jewish neighbors?
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 03,00.html

This Jewish ancestry also explains why Goering's nephew jubilantly dropped bombs over the German population.

http://forum.armyairforces.com/Werner-G ... 92804.aspx
http://www.commandposts.com/2012/03/we- ... -him-dead/



http://books.google.com/books?id=9e60nk ... 22&f=false


Tainted Names and New Jewish Identities
As I write that descendants of prominent Nazis have chosen to live in Israel today, and that some of them – with surnames like Goering, Goebbels or Himmler
-- are converted to Judaism or in process, I realize that readers will reread this sentence to make sure they didn’t misread.
http://www.thejewishweek.com/blogs/well ... identitie

but wait, there's more.....

Servalan: Should Dinosaur-denial be a crime?

by Servalan

It's been years since I wrote about Dinos being fake. Giant flying lizards! New species being found every day and always by dino hunters, sometimes their kids? Yesterday another new species(missing link) was found by some dino hunters, it was called Wy-Lie-I. Apparently it's the tip of a discovery iceberg and it should be a bumper year for dino experts!!!!!

I wrote this recently when talking about Romans being fake, it should help understand my position:

Imagine a courtroom, me on my own on the defense side the scientists/experts crowded in on the prosecutions. The crime? Not believing in Romans. A serious offence, if convicted I would be thought mentally unstable. The prosecutions table is piled high with evidence, mine is empty. The judge wants to know where my evidence is? I walk over to the prosecutions table and take all their evidence to my own. The judge, who is a wise man, knows my intention. He knows that for me to be right all these papers, goblets, and coins must be fake. He orders a recess to examine the evidence for himself........

While I wait I am approached by a respectable looking gentleman who wishes to know if I'm also the man who believes that space is a lie? "that's me" I say, reaching into my pocket to bring out a cigarette lighter. I throw it into the air and catch it again and again until the man walks away shaking his head.

Hexane on Adolf Hitler: Jewish Asset

by Hexane.


As Hitler was a jew put in place by greater Jewish leaders with the goal of forcing jews to go to Israel, we can understand the role of deportation camps.

1) The goal was to send a big part of European jews in areas which would be occupied by Soviet armies at the end of the war. Thus those jews would be trapped in the USSR. And what a hazard, USSR had suddenly become hostile to jews (after 1942). And even if it hadn't been hostile to jews, the fact that it was a not fun at all place was enough to push those jews toward Israel.

And by letting some of them escape Germany before the war to go to Palestine, they also achieved a part of this goal.

2) The goal was also to traumatize a little bit the jews in order to push them toward Israel after the war, even if they weren't trapped in the USSR.

Of course many weren't so traumatized, since in some camps, the life was quite cool (swimming pool, theater, soccer field, library, etc..., in Auschwitz). But the deportation itself was quite traumatizing. And it's possible that some camps were not so cool, in order to traumatize more some of the jews.

And as Jewish leaders knew that they would push the story of the holocaust after the war, they knew that many jews would be artificially traumatized after the event, even if they weren't so traumatized when the events took place. With this propaganda, suddenly, someone who had spent the war in a quite cool camp thought that, with an incredible chance, he had escaped an horrible death.

3) The third goal was to protect them against the war. Many losses took place in towns. By putting jews into camps, far away from towns, Jewish leaders avoided the loss of many of them.

Helmsdale on the scum who own large corporations using slave-labour in the UK

by Helmsdale, 2011

It's from the Guardian, which is left-wing, but that is irrelevant here, this should be of interest to those from across the political spectrum:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/ ... employment

Make young people study hard for a university degree so that they can fucking be forced to work for no pay (except a £50 payment once a week from the Job Centre?)

The scum behind this deserve bullets through their skulls.

The far-left of the likes of the Occupy movement say "Capitalism is Crisis". I have to agree with them on this, even though they are Marxists. I would be happy to see capitalism smashed, but races preserved. Those who say 'smash racism' are advocating genocide. Neither capitalism nor communism are good systems. There is of course Third Position politics, but it's very, very fringe.

One advocate of Third Position style ideas was the late Colonel Gaddafi. He said he would die a martyr. And he did.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_International_Theory

Some of these ideas are very interesting. Ideas simply being interesting does not, of course, mean that they will ever be implemented in practice. They will be implemented, when pigs fly.

But I want to consider the Guardian article the main topic. Note that there is plenty of left-wing hostility to Zionist activity - that was a factor in motivating Breivik, who shot Norwegian youths who had 'boycott Israel' banners. Many Jewish 'neoconservatives' (anti-Islam, pro-Israel) like Melanie Philips started out as left-wing, but shifted their position later in life. The organised left, taking a Jewish-created meme (the left basically have Karl Marx as the root foundation of their ideas), have ironically come back to attack Jews with a Jewish creation. It is worth noting that communist regimes had Marx as central to their ideas and the death toll from their regimes globally is much higher than that of the regimes run by fascists/Nazis. Take Pol Pot in Cambodia for example - he wanted to destroy everything about the culture of his nation, and erase every part of its history.

Whenever any Marxist mentions the Nazis, show them this:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-37K1vbqImDo/T ... ll_Map.jpg

Indirectly Marx's ideas were responsible for this.

I also think the idea of getting large numbers of young people of both sexes to go to university and then struggle for getting jobs, whilst allowing massive immigration and allowing those immigrants to benefit from taxpayers' money is an extremely effective strategy to reduce the white birth rate of the UK. Other Western nations may have a similar story to tell.

Cunctator, writing in 2011, on the plans to foment a European War

We've reached the stage of Jew-inspired degeneration where violent interventions by "good" countries like the United States, Britain and France can quite easily be arranged, so long as they're intended to promote "democracy" and "human rights", "benefit" persons with differing shades of brown skin, and result in no more than two million civilian casualties.

But my last conscious thought before I nodded off in the early hours of this morning was a realization that something closer to home, which (for me for now) is the UK, is almost certainly on the cards. WWIII, in fact. And like its predecessors, the Jews will foment it by working upon pre-existing European rivalries, tensions and jealousies.

I was asleep before I could develop the thought, and it might well have remained inchoate and eventually been forgotten, had I not by chance caught a glimpse of Chief Justice Leveson - who is chairing the inquiry into press ethics in the UK following the revelations about phone hacking at the now-defunct Murdoch (mother Greene, Jewish)-owned News of the World sunday tabloid - as I passed a monitor showing Sky News this lunchtime.

I'm not particularly interested in the Leveson cover up, except to note that the fact that a Jew - and, per the Jewish Chronicle, a particularly observant Jew who takes his Sabbath very seriously - is being given responsibility for an inquiry into standards in a press that is 100 per cent Jew-controlled is the very definition of Chutzpah! That it was revealed shortly after Leveson was appointed that he had a serious conflict of interest, as he had social ties to Elisabeth Murdoch via her husband the Jew PR Man Matthew Freud (a scion of one of the most notorious culture distorting clans, whose members include quack psychologist Sigmund, propaganda and public relations pioneer Edward Bernays, and talentless painter of grotesque nudes Lucian) with whom he has dined twice in the past year alone, says it all really about who runs Britain and what they think they can get away with. In today's Britain, it seems that it it is not enough for Justice NOT to be done; to satisfy the wire pullers behind the scenes it must be SEEN not to be done.

Anyway, to return to my point, the sight of Leveson triggered a remembrance of my last conscious thought before falling asleep twelve hours previously, which was that you can be sure that a European war is imminent when all of a sudden you notice that virtually everyone in an outward position of power is a Jew or part-Jew, and that the noise of dogs Jewish and Masonic barking in the background is growing ever louder. There is a certain inevitability about the run-up to catastrophe. So, for Stalin (Djugashvili), Churchill (whose Jewish mother, Brooklyn-born Jennie Jerome, was the biggest society slut of her time and surely the very type of those "society ladies" referred to in the Protocols as having a key role to play in undermining nations by spreading corruption and license in high places), Hitler (read Kardel or Bronder), Georges Mandel (real name Jeroboam Rothschild), FDR (a double-barrelled Jew who came from Sephardic slave-dealing "aristocracy" on both sides as any look at the "pedigree" of the Delanos and the Rosenveldts could confirm), Eisenhower and co, read Cameron (Levitas), Sarkozy and co.

Consider this:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/eur ... 23,00.html

'Cameron Is a Coward'
European Politicians Slam British EU Veto

By Veit Medick and Annett Meiritz

AP
British Prime Minister David Cameron is happy not to be in the euro.
Following David Cameron's veto of EU treaty reform, there is plenty of frustration in Europe over Britain's stubborn attitude in the battle against the debt crisis. Prominent members of the European Parliament have strongly criticized the British prime minister and sent him a clear message: Europe doesn't need you.

It is an irony of history -- on this very day 20 years ago, the Maastricht Treaty was signed, bringing the European Union into existence. On Dec. 9 and 10, 1991, the 12 leaders of the European Community agreed to the groundbreaking agreement and a historic project was set on its way.

Two decades on, and with the European debt crisis in full flow, the EU is facing its toughest test so far. Now one person stands out as the most divisive figure: David Cameron. Following marathon talks on Thursday night, the British prime minister vetoed a change in the EU treaties as called for by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy.

Cameron's use of his veto has provided for much discontent within the European Parliament. "It was a mistake to admit the British into the European Union," said Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, a prominent German MEP with the business-friendly Free Democrats, and vice chair of ALDE, the liberal block in the European Parliament. The UK must now renegotiate its relationship with the EU, he said. "Either they do it by themselves, or the EU will be founded anew -- without Great Britain," Lambsdorff said. "Switzerland is also a possible role model for the British," he added, refering to the fiercely independent stance of the Alpine country, which is not an EU member.

Harsh Attacks and Clear Frustration

There has also been sharp criticism of Cameron's attitude from the co-chairman of the Greens group in the European Parliament, Franco-German politician Daniel Cohn-Bendit. "Cameron is a coward," he said. He accused the British prime minister of not wanting to deal with the conflict over the Europe Union within his Conservative Party. Cameron, he said, had "manoeuvred himself into a populist corner" from which he would no longer emerge.

Elmar Brok, a member of Germany's conservative Christian Democratic Union and foreign policy spokesman for the center-right European People's Party (EPP), said: "If you're not willing to stick to the rules, you should keep your mouth shut."

These are harsh attacks. But despite all the frustration, the message is clear: The European project can not be allowed to collapse because of the UK's obstinate attitude towards the debt crisis. Cameron's critics are sending a clear signal to London: If necessary, things can carry on without you. Those critics are clearly hoping that Britain's decision will come back to haunt it at some point, and that the country will come to realize what a serious mistake it was committing when it turned its back on Europe.

This approach is also apparently being followed at the highest level. The 17 euro-zone states, together with at least six and maybe as many as nine other EU countries, aim to conclude a separate stability treaty in order to defuse the debt crisis. It's a risky step, because it is not yet clear whether the proposal can easily be implemented legally. But those member states are also sending a signal, namely that they can move forward without the British.

Cameron's behavior in Brussels has also irritated many MEPs. The British prime minister downright flaunted his veto, or at least so it appears to his critics. "What was on offer was not in Britain's interest … so I didn't sign up to it," Cameron said. A little later, he made it clear that his country would not want to adopt the euro in the future either -- he was happy not to be in the Schengen Agreement, and happy not to be in the euro, he said.

'You Can't Be a Little Bit Pregnant'

Manfred Weber, vice chairman of the European People's Party, was annoyed about Cameron's "distancing rhetoric." But at the same time he believes it was ill-advised from the viewpoint of the prime minister: "The country is primarily damaging itself." The British must now decide if they want to be in the EU club or not, he says. "The game of always wanting to have a say in the debate while also wrecking every compromise is not acceptable in the long run," says Weber. "You can't be a little bit pregnant."

Reinhard Bütikofer, vice chairman of the Greens/European Free Alliance block in the European Parliament, also sees Britain as facing an historic decision. He would like the British to continue being part of the fold, he said, "but on Europe's terms, rather than Cameron's." It was not, however, currently necessary to exert excessive pressure, let alone make threats, he said, explaining that the prime minister's veto was a clear "sign of weakness."

Others were rather more forceful in that respect. Elmar Brok, for example, feels that the UK is one of Europe's most important partners, "but in a crisis, a partner must above all be loyal and ready to compromise." The other partners must now marginalize Britain, "so that the country comes to feel its loss of influence," he said.
Manfred Weber also urged EU member states to demonstrate more self-confidence. "It must be made clear to Great Britain: Either you want the whole package, or you can leave it alone."

Some believe they already know how to make that happen, namely by taking a clear political stance. "Now," says Green politician Cohn-Bendit, "we must put pressure on the British and force them, by implementing tough regulations on financial markets, to decide if they want out of the EU or if they want to stay inside."

End

Cohn-Bendit, a Jew who professes atheism, is a self-confessed paedophile:

http://firstlightforum.wordpress.com/20 ... en-bendit/

Here is another thought-provoking piece which again gives some insight into how (and by whom, as before, Jews in bold) the temperature is being ratcheted up, as in the run-up to the two previous world wars:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 75767.html

Britain's self-imposed isolation from European treaty reform talks is a "blessing" for other EU nations, one of President Nicolas Sarkozy's leading advisers said at the weekend. Although Britain's split with the rest of the EU was "regrettable", it would make future negotiations on a fiscal union to save the euro much simpler, said Jean-David Levitte, President Sarkozy's chief diplomatic adviser.

David Cameron's (Levitas) veto of a formal EU treaty in Brussels on Friday could therefore be seen as a "bénediction", or "blessing", Mr Levitte told the World Policy Conference in Vienna. It would short-circuit the need for laborious negotiations with Britain on a formal EU treaty. It would therefore make it possible for the other 26 EU countries to reach a looser "inter-governmental" agreement by March on rules to harmonise fiscal and economic policies and rebuild global confidence in the euro.

Mr Levitte's words may strengthen the arguments of those in Britain who suggest that Mr Cameron fell into a "French trap" in Brussels on Friday. French officials insist that this was not the case. By vetoing a formal EU treaty, the French officials say, Mr Cameron made it easier for other nations – France included – to persuade Germany to accept the looser, "inter-governmental" path to reform. But the officials say that this was not a "French trap" but the result of Mr Cameron's "aggressive and clumsy" tactics.

Even moderate and serious [LOL] voices in the French media suggested at the weekend that the summit could make Britain's future within the EU untenable. In a signed, front-page editorial, Erik Izraelewicz , the editor of the influential centre-left newspaper Le Monde, said: "One can now legitimately question [Britain's] continued presence in the single [European] market and its position within the European Commission and other European institutions".

Le Monde's Elysée Palace correspondent, Arnaud Parmentier, said that the Brussels summit had already, in effect, "booted Britain out of Europe". He used an archaic French word "bouter" (to expel), which was supposedly used by Joan of Arc when she threatened to drive English forces out of France in the 15th century.

In Germany, meanwhile, politicians yesterday lined up to criticise David Cameron for his EU veto while dozens of newspapers voiced incomprehension at Britain's new stance. Martin Schulz, the Social Democrat MEP who is the future president of the European Parliament, said he doubted whether Britain would remain in the EU in the long term.

"David Cameron has scored a gigantic own goal," he told Bild am Sonntag newspaper. "Never was Britain so isolated in the EU."

His views were echoed by Gunther Krichbaum, the chairman of Germany's parliamentary committee on Europe. He said the British now had to decide whether they were for or against Europe. "The Lisbon Treaty makes it expressly clear that all options are open, including leaving the EU," he said.

Additional reporting by Tony Paterson in Berlin

End

The reality is that Rothschild and associates own all the major global central banks, including the ECB (and member banks), Federal Reserve and the Bank of England. They are a worldwide money issuing monopoly, and the branch offices aka the chiefs of the central banks of so-called sovereign nations meet every few weeks in Basel, Switzerland at the headquarters of this usury cartel, the Bank of International Settlements, to coordinate policy on credit expansion or contraction. Whenever a pound or euro or dollar is created by by these banks, the government has to issue an IOU known as a bond to cover this amount. The money could quite easily directly by the government itself without incurring a liability to a private banking cartel - but that is another matter.

The point is this: The Jewish-owned so-called Bank of England and Federal Reserve are printing money like crazy, whilst the ECB is refusing to do so. Why? Because a war is being planned. And the fact that Cameron, Miliband, Sarkozy, Hollande, and all those on both sides of the ever-louder arguments we are going to be hearing over the coming months are all Jews is the greatest guarantee of what is about to happen.

An Irish politician, Micheál Martin seems to be aware of what is going on. Read between the lines of what he has said:

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ire ... el?via=rel

Mr Martin contended that the focus of the talks on fiscal governance and compliance was misplaced. He said they should have been ensuring adequate funding to prevent further bailouts.

“Countries such as the USA and the UK with much worse debt and deficit problems than the euro zone have had no problem borrowing from the markets.

“The reason is because they have what the euro zone does not, central banks which are willing to step in and guarantee a market for issuing new sovereign debt.

“What has actually happened is that all of the effort of the union has gone into providing funds for bailout rather than providing funds to prevent bailouts being necessary.

“The ECB is now in the perverse situation of actually encouraging investors to flee European debt.”

Another major contention of the response was that if the many billions at the disposal of the ECB were to be turned to the primary bond market rather than the secondary market, the crisis would be ended overnight.

“There are many ways this could be done either through a change of the EU treaties or within them, but on Friday it was decided not to do this. It was a case of carry on regardless of the mounting evidence.

End of extract

So remember, whenever you read an article about "Germany" or "France" or "Britain", or Merkel, Sarkozy/Hollande or Cameron/Miliband arguing about how best to deal with the sovereign debt crisis, that:

(1) Nine out of ten of the advisers giving inflammatory quotes, such as the one at the last summit by an unnamed "French" adviser who ridiculed Cameron's (Levitas') negotiating position by equating him to a man attending a wife-swapping party without his wife, are Jews. (Btw, who but a Jew could come up with such an analogy? If you were a high-ranking diplomat, and someone asked you your impressions of somebody else's negotiating position, would a wife-swapping party be top-of-mind for you? Little details like this give a very important clue as to the mindset of these people: it is absolutely different to that of a normal person. For them it is perfectly logical and normal for a Cohn-Bendit, a Greville Janner, or a Barney Frank to molest children in plain view whilst enjoying parliamentary privilege. That they are allowed to do so and that those who would expose them are ridiculed, vilified, threatened, and even suicided is a "mitzvah" (commandment) which they hope will eventually force us to willingly embrace Talmudic morality which asserts that fiddling with children is a healthy and good thing). They are doing this to raise the temperature to the point where a really lucrative European war can once again be worked up (the Balkan "skirmishes" following the break-up of Yugoslavia were a long-time ago and the incidental benefits in terms of forced prostitution and drugs cannot compare with the "upside" from a "real" European war); and

(2) The Central Banks of Germany, and France, the ECB, and the Bank of England are all owned by the Rothschilds, as are all other so-called national banks today with the possible exception of Iran's national bank. The Rothschilds and the shady crew of banksters who work for them have a monopoly on the creation of money for the entire world; except that what they create out of thin air and charge interest on is NOT money properly understood. So any so-called arguments about how to deal with the crisis are just for show; policy has already been decided long in advance and minions like Merkel, Cameron and Sarkozy are certainly not in on the decision making. But because in their vanity they are jousting for a certain amount of public applause and dealing to a certain extent with real national rivalries and jealousies - the most significant here being the mutual loathing of the British and French which is only outweighed by their even-greater shared fear of German strength - there is still a need to have reliable persons on the ground. Merkel and the German leadership is allowed to be non-Jew because that country is still occupied, there are not so many Jews on the ground there thanks to the effectiveness of the Transfer Agreement between the Nazis and the Zionist leadership. Also, Germans have been so brainwashed with Holocaust guilt that the Jews feel that they are the best-trained of their European Shabbat Goyim. But countries like Britain and France, with their ridiculous pretensions to continued significance, need nowadays to have Jewish leaders, cabinets, and advisers just in case, hence, Cameron / Miliband has its mirror image in Sarkozy / Hollande (would have been another Jew in Strauss-Kahn but Sarkozy used his fellow Jew's sexual aggression against him). In fact in Sarkozy's initial cabinet I think pretty much everyone except Rashida Dati and perhaps some other token minority person was Jewish! Anyway, the point is, if the Fed and the Bank of England are doing quantitive easing (i.e. issuing trillions of pounds and dollars in IOUs to cover the trillions the private central banks are creating out of thin air) whilst the ECB is not; it is not because "Frau Merkel is a stern monetarist wedded to fiscal discipline". Rather it is because JEWS are using the tensions that will necessarily arise as a result of these outwardly different policies, to foment war.