Resisting the One-world State. Demanding a peaceful restoration of National Freedom and Social Justice. Taking a stand against the Neo-Nazi hobbyists and the Hitler Cultists.
You don't "latch onto" a NWO agenda. There are too many of those being expressed for someone to "latch onto" any particular one of them. You study. And, Keep an open mind - not open so that the brains fall out, but open in reviewing and analyzing different theories realistically in order to determine facts. I've done that and I have my opinions based upon all that I have studied over a period of several years. There is still much to learn, but I can tell you that there is a NWO agenda being directed from several sources. Those are all working together and the control for those varying sources is with certain ones of a particular group, tribe or clan, those with a very similarly described name to "Zionists". You would be afraid to call them by their name - jews.
It would make you cringe inside to do so, wouldn't it? Why is that? Are you afraid of them? No - then you must have a deep and enduring respect for them based upon your own associations with them, am I right? It is more clear when you have the name correct, and get past your fears in order to have an open minded ability to study, even for those things that you now probably find offensive or "politically inconvenient". You sound as if you are young enough to learn - if you really try. There is much to learn, and many deceptions placed in your path, including misleading names which are used to misdirect attention onto someone or something else, usually a smaller segment which are under the control of those you are afraid to name. Zionist may be one of those names because it misdirects toward a small and ill-defined segment.
Try NWO, "illuminati" or "elite", Central Banks, media, Black Nobility, and continue through the list. All of them play their parts, but there is a center. It's that center which control them all.
Many people are looking. Some have found the answer. The problem is that few people are able to overcome fear and to look diligently for themselves. Truth will not come from controlled sources and it will not come to you unless you actually look. It is more people with answers based on their own study and knowledge which is needed. Those are needed soon. I think Helmsdale is only expressing the frustration that so many of us have felt after seeing so many apathetic people in our society and having searched for answers for ourselves without finding them. That frustration, and the reactions of withdrawal and resort to childishness, depression and abject apathy which we encounter in our society, are part of a planned conditioning which are created by followers of Tavistock style social conditioning. I think Helmsdale is open to the truth. He just hasn't been capable of determining what it is that is the truth, and has become skeptical that there are answers. I suspect he is wanting to learn, but needs the ability to be able to confirm some of the facts for himself. He is not apathetic and is intelligent. He just needs information and some degree of certainty (which only comes by study and confirmation for oneself). This is only a very small segment, and about only one segment, of those who are controlling within all of our societies. Remember, this is not truly a "grassroots" control being exercised by the treasonors. This is about taking control at the top levels and imposing a system downward onto the people. When those who control our money and our media obtain control of those who are supposed to be our politicians, and turn them instead into controllers for them, the results can be disasterous. We see the beginning stages of that in our world today. That is what was experienced by Russia.
Russia was not taken over by a "revolution of the people". Russia was taken over by a jewish mob. Much of that mob operated from England and the US, at least from the financing end. The jewish takeover of Russia was supported by international jewry.
The US (not the same as America or the American people, at least the aware and thinking ones) government is responsive to jewish control today. The "US" are the military arm of that control. An agenda becomes more clear. Anyone watching that tape of unleashed tribal hatreds and still mouthing "group retributive justice" is here on an agenda. Trying to switch the focus away from that undisguised loathing of White and non-jewish peoples to something that is entirely unrelated, Shame, Shame, whatever your real name is! But, since you choose to evade the true issues and to switch the topic to slavery:
"In the case of Mr Rothschild, the documents reveal for the first time that he made personal gains by using slaves as collateral in banking dealings with a slave owner.
This will surprise those familiar with his role in organising the loan that funded the UK government’s bail-out of British slave owners when colonial slavery was abolished in the 1830s. It was the biggest bail-out of an industry as a percentage of annual government expenditure – dwarfing last year’s rescue of the banking sector."
Very few White people owned slaves--slavery was a rich man's pursuit, and slavery did not exist amongst the middle and working classes of White people.
European Whites did not bring the slaves to America. On the contrary, it was the Jews who brought them here (as Louis Fahrakkan has also pointed out). Below is a listing of the Jewish slave ships and the Jewish owners of them.
Name of ship Owners- all are Jews:
The Abigail was owned by Aaron Lopez, Moses Levy, Jacob Franks
The Crown was owned by Issac Levy and Nathan Simpson
The Nassau and Four Sisters were both owned by Moses Levy
Anne & Eliza owned by Justus Bosch and John Abrams
Prudent Betty owned by Henry Cruger and Jacob Phoenix
The Hester and the Elizabeth were both owned by Mordecai and David Gomez
Antigua owned by Nathan Marston and Abram Lyell
Betsy owned by Wm. De Woolf
Polly owned by James De Woolf
White Horse owned by Jan de Sweevts
Expedition owned by John and Jacob Roosevelt
Charlotte owned by Moses and Sam Levy and Jacob Franks
Caracoa owned by Moses and Sam Levy
Source: Elizabeth Donnan, 4 Volumes, 'Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade to America' Washington, D.C. (1930, 1935) Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, Pa. And I thought that your "chosen" topic was slavery and the jews part in it! It has a certain way of changing, doesn't it?! What about the jews who brought the slaves to America?
I see. They've branched into media now!
http://thezog.wordpress.com/ [Click on the section of your choosing from the links on the right - Media is under "Mass Media"].
I don't agree with everything which is said by the writer whose excerpt appears below, but he makes a good point about the "persecution". Why is it that in every country which the jew has lived (and has been expelled), the jews recount "persecutions" as being the reason? -----------
"All this is closely related to another aspect of Judaism, namely the persecution myth. Since first appearing in history, we find the Jews propagating the idea that they are an abused and persecuted people, and this idea is, and has always been, central in Jewish thinking. The myth of persecution is the adhesive and cement of Judaism: without it Jews would have long since ceased to exist, their racial-religious nationality notwithstanding.
It is a fact that the Jewish people have suffered numerous hardships in the course of their history, but this is true of other peoples too. The chief difference is that the Jews have kept score. We Must repeat—they have kept score—they have made a tradition of persecution.
A casual slaughter of thousands of Christians is remembered by no one in 50 years, but a disability visited upon a few Jews is preserved forever in Jewish histories. And they tell their woes not only to themselves, but to a sympathetic world as well." ------------
Actually, to get back on topic, the title should NOT read, "The NWO-Zionist crap is mainstream". It should read, "The Jewish NWO crap is mainstream".
There is a difference. Dialectical terms and labels help to hide that the different groups which carry the labels (such as zionists, CFR, Bilderberg, Black Nobility, etc.) are jewish controlled, and that it is all of them that are controlled by jewry. I won't go into the details of it for now, but the NWO is itself one of those dialectical fronts and the term is intended to mislead people to believe that it is only powerful financial interests, those of the "Illuminati" or "Elite" varieties of traitorous scum, who are the problem.
Jewry actually intends to create a JNO (a Jewish Noahide Order), which will have the true power vested in jewry and jews, while the non-jews of the world are treated as slaves and cattle for the exclusive benefit of jewry. The NWO is merely a front vehicle in order to establish that. I would advise any who care to do it, and who know to do so, to explore that topic of noahide (noachide) law more deeply. The infrastructure is being set up in most countries of the world (on a "voluntary" basis for now) for that JNO. It needs for a few conditions to be met in order to become "legal" according to their instructions. "Legal" requirements will be set for enforcement once those conditions have been met. The penalties for non-compliance by non-jews with noahide status will be much worse than any accorded in "1984", I assure you, and the penalties are not economic. I won't spoil the surprises which are in store for those who do take the time to research that topic thoroughly, by giving you the answers.
Please note from the overall picture of what was discussed above, the similarities with a "Soviet" comintern. Ask yourself what does "Soviet" actually mean, and who it was who were the actual "Soviets"?
Here is a little more information on different aspects of jewry which everyone will find to be of interest. Scroll down at the site below for the different sections.
Since previous discussions have centered on the topic of jews and slavery of blacks, I'm adding another link which gives good information in regard to that subject for those people who are interested in that issue. It is from a black website, "Blacks & Jews". The jewish media and their gatekeepers in society have turned the facts upside down.
___________________
The history that the old "Black-Jewish Coalition" clumsily avoids is the entire three century history of Jewish presence in South America and the Caribbean. But other highly acclaimed Jewish scholars have not been so blind:
•Lee M. Friedman, a one-time president of the American Jewish Historical Society, wrote that in Brazil, where most of the Africans actually went, "the bulk of the slave trade was in the hands of Jewish settlers."
•Marcus Arkin wrote that the Jews of Surinam used "many thousands" of Black slaves.
•Herbert I. Bloom wrote that "the slave trade was one of the most important Jewish activities here (in Surinam) as elsewhere in the colonies." He even published a 1707 list of Jewish buyers by name with the number of Black humans they purchased.
•Cecil Roth, writer of 30 books and hundreds of articles on Jewish history, wrote that the slave revolts in parts of South America "were largely directed against [Jews] as being the greatest slave-holders of the region."
•"I gather," wrote Jewish scholar Wilfred Samuels, "that the Jews [of Barbados] made a good deal of their money by purchasing and hiring out negroes..."
•According to the Jewish historians, all Barbadian Jews owned slaves - even the rabbi had "the enjoyment of his own two negro attendants."
•In Curaçao which was a major slave trading depot, Isaac and Susan Emmanuel report that "the shipping business was mainly a Jewish enterprise."
•Says yet another Jewish writer of the Jews of Curaçao, "Almost every Jew bought from one to nine slaves for his personal use or for eventual resale."
•Seymour B. Liebman in his New World Jewry, made it clear that "[t]he ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains."
•Moshe Kahan stated bluntly that in 1653-1658, " Jewish-Marrano merchants were in control of the Spanish and Portuguese trade, were almost in control of the Levantine trade...were interested in the Dutch East and West Indian companies, were heavily involved in shipping; and, most important, had at their disposal large amounts of capital."
•In Brazil, where most of our kidnapped ancestors were sent, Jewish scholar Arnold Wiznitzer is most explicit about Jewish involvement:
"Besides their important position in the sugar industry and in tax farming, they dominated the slave trade. From 1636 to 1645 a total of 23,163 Negro slaves arrived from Africa and were sold for 6,714,423 florins. The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates....If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on Friday, October 21, 1644." ___________________
Rush Limbaugh is a cow who eats Kosher Greens and feeds his listeners fresh BS daily straight from the asses at Mossad Pastures —
“This is the Israeli who signs my check. Just look at the beak on that bitch.” [Photos are at the link]
“You didn’t know my ultimate boss is an Israeli? An Israeli woman by the name of Orit Gadiesh…used to work in “Israeli Intelligence”…actually the rumor is that she’s MOSSAD…well – she’s the CEO of a company called Bain Capital Partners in Boston
http://www.baincapital.com/. Bain Capital owns Clear Channel Communications – and I work directly for Clear Channel Premier Radio Networks.
Anyway, Orit Gadiesh is an Israeli national with direct ties to the Israeli Intelligence community – and as you know – propaganda is real important to those Israeli Intelligence types.
They pay me lots of Jewish Federal Reserve Notes to:
1) Channel your anger away from Israel and Jews, and
2) Get you to associate “patriotism” with support for a foreign nation – Israel.” [Continues]
———— Pay attention when the poster at the link above talks about the differences between the dollar bills, first, as a United States Reserve Bank Note, and, second, as a dollar bill which is a Jewish Federal Reserve Note.
======0 That is a difference which will make people pay attention – when they can recognize the difference. Below is some information which will help them recognize that the “US” dollar bill is JEWISH – and who it is who controls that dollar - after they had gained control in America. ======0
“The Rothschilds are the wonders of modern banking… We see the descendants of Judah, after a persecution of two thousand years, peering above kings, rising higher than emperors, and holding a whole continent in the hollow of their hands. The Rothschilds govern a Christian world. Not a cabinet moves without their advice. They stretch their hand, with equal ease, from Petersburg to Vienna, from Vienna to Paris, from Paris to London, from London to Washington. Baron Rothschild, the head of the house, is the true king of Judah, the prince of the captivity, the Messiah so long looked for by this extraordinary people. He holds the keys of peace or war, blessing or cursing… They are the brokers and counselors of the kings of Europe and of the republican chiefs of America. What more can they desire?” –Niles Weekly Register, 1835-1836
“Who controls the issuance of money controls the government!” –Nathan Meyer Rothschild
Ownership of the Federal Reserve
Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris Israel Moses Sieff Bank of Italy Warburg Batiks of Hamburg and Amsterdam Lehman Brothers Bank of New York Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (controlled by the Rockefellers) Goldman Sachs Bank of New York
“The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.” –The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863. ——- SEE this link for more info if needed – BUT PLEASE avoid using the term “elite” for these scrubby money-grubbing subversive jews. They are high-level administrators and instigators of satanic [Luciferian] jew communism, assisted by high-level Freemasons such as the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR].
I'll give my own opinion, which anyone is free to take as they wish, but my suggestions are intended to make the site more usable.
I think we may have too many topics and few of them are directly related to the interests of people who are posting. Most of us here are jewwise people, at least to some extent. If we are billing as a free speech site, the topics are scattered and are not reflecting that. I know the tendancy is to add more topics, but that may not be wise because the site may become difficult to use. Instead it may be best to direct toward a target audience.
I personally think that people who have been censored would be a good audience to aim for. People whose blogs have been taken down, videos removed, comments deleted, etc. would welcome a place to be able to get their views out, and to describe what happened to them. A central place where those could be heard, or where people could find out what happened to the blogs or places they went to, would be a good service to provide. We might learn how to support each other and to fight back against some of the censorship. Your own interests may not run in this direction and it is only a suggestion. ---------------
I recently had downloaded a PDF page on a Canadian site which dealt with the Kosher Tax that everyone in the world is paying on the products they buy. When I returned the site had been seized by jews who were upset by the good common sense which was made and posted at that site. Here is one of the items which was on it, which dealt with the charges which jews make about people who expose the jews and their scams, which always results in the loud wails from jews about "anti-semitism". I suppose these jews felt that this was "anti-semitic". What do you think?: __________________ [Message is from the owner of the censored Canadian site]
There is one category of people to whom the charge of anti-Semitism does not stick. These people are Jews themselves. If a Jew criticizes some other Jew, or criticizes some action of the State of Israel, then it is not completely credible that he does so on account of his own anti-Semitism. The derogatory label for such a person is more likely to be "self-hating Jew" rather than "anti-Semite," but "self-hating Jew" does not carry the same power to intimidate and to silence. For this reason, perhaps — that is, because they are uniquely not susceptible to being intimidated by the accusation of anti-Semitism — some of the most vocal and uninhibited critics of positions taken by particular Jews and or by the State of Israel have been Jews themselves, as for example Noam Chomsky, Boaz Evron, Norman Finkelstein, Akiva Orr, Philip Roth, John Sack, Israel Shahak, Yoram Sheftel, or William Wolf.
Take your choice
A people cannot have it both ways. They cannot accept welfare and hope to be economically productive, and they cannot shelter under the umbrella of intellectual impunity and hope to be intellectually excellent, or even intellectually respectable . They must choose one or the other; they cannot have both. If a people set intellectual excellence as their goal, then they should seek the opposite of immunity from criticism, they should seek to attract upon themselves more criticism than is common, and should learn to respond to that increased criticism without resorting to ad hominem attacks upon the sanity of their critics.
Dabbling in psychiatry
Yes, that is what the accusation of anti-Semitism is — an ad hominem attack questioning the sanity of the critic. Anti-Semitism is a diagnosis of mental illness because anti-Semitism is defined as an irrational, all-consuming, reason-distorting hatred, and if that is not a variety of mental illness, then I do not know what is. The diagnosis differs from other psychiatric diagnoses in one major respect — the belief that the people best qualified to perform the diagnosis are not psychiatrists, but Jews. Thus, when someone tells a Jewish historian or Nazi hunter that an event did not take place, and the Jewish historian or Nazi hunter replies — whether euphemistically or bluntly — with the accusation of anti-Semitism, then the Jewish historian says, in effect, "You're nuts!" He says "I'm Jewish, I'm qualified to say you're nuts, I say you're nuts, so you're nuts!" Case closed. Conversation over. The Jewish historian or Nazi hunter — turned Jewish psychiatric diagnostician — thus invokes protection from challenge, society grants him the protection he invokes, and he wins. His victory is an effortless one. He does not need to grapple with the content of the criticism. The content is brushed aside. His victory, rather, consists of offering his critic a psychiatric diagnosis, along with the implication that anyone suffering from the disorder diagnosed does not need to be taken seriously, and in fact would do the world a favor by crawling into a hole somewhere and hiding his shame. The accusation of anti-Semitism is the universal rebuttal, good at all times and in all places and in response to all opposition. Once memorized — which is not hard — it needs to be varied hardly at all from one situation to the next. Once practiced, it becomes reflexive, and renders painful thinking unecessary.
Euphemistic diagnosis
When Canadian Federal Court judge William McKeown decided a few weeks ago that 83-year-old Latvian Arvids Vitols did not misrepresent his wartime record to Canadian authorities, Sol Littman responded by recommending that McKeown should go for sensitivity training. What was this but an ad hominem attack? What was this but a delicate and euphemistic variation of the blunter, "You're an anti-Semite and should seek psychiatric help"? What was this but a shot across the bow, a gentle reminder of the harsher expressions of the same diagnosis that might be forthcoming should judge McKeown hand down similar decisions in the future? And — let us not forget — what was this but a signal to all Jews that in certain situations they are exempted from having to think as hard as other people, and a signal to those other people to decrease their respect for the quality of Jewish thought? ____________________
My own comment where I discovered that the site had been closed is in this posting which dealt with the Kosher Tax.
Thus, according to the most credible jew and Christian sources in the world, there were 89,993,458 FEWER Christians after the war, and 438,648 MORE jews after the war, than there were before. But, at the historic growth rate of the Christian population of 1.5% per year, the 682,400,000 <http://web.archive.org/web/200807230308 ... anparty.ne… 1933.htm> Christians in the world in 1933 would have been 853,158,362 by 1948. Instead, mostly due to WWII, the actual population was 592,406,542 <http://web.archive.org/web/200807230308 ... anparty.ne… 1948.htm> , 260,751,820 fewer Christians than there would have been without WWII. Even at a more conservative growth rate of Christians of 1% per year, there were 199,838,673 fewer Christians in 1948 than there would have been without WWII.
Henry says: "...there has never been a revolution that was not instigated by the Rothschild parasites.",
...and Henry neglects to mention that there are two thousand little jewish parasites who go around blaming it all on "just Rothschild" or the "Illuminati" or the host of other front names which are used by the jews in order to misdirect and confuse the non-jew. All of it is intended to hide that it is MOST of the jews who are participating in deceiving about the treasons which various of them are conducting against all non-jews, AND that they are doing it - ALONG WITH Rothschild, et al.
But, THAT is what they are paid to do. "Zionism, Communism, Libertine liberalism, Illuminated Freemasonry etc have their origins in the Talmud. To single out any branch of the anti-human plot but to ignore the common root, is like giving a patient an aspirin but ignoring the knife in his side."
Great description and analogy
Sure there is cooperation between the jews and the others, but it is the jews in the background who are calling the shots for all of them (and either funding and financing - or withholding funding and financing), all the programs which place the others into the obvious positions while the jew remains hidden in the shadows - with his money bag open and his knife in the other hand.
It was that way when the offensive began against Whites in South Africa - and that was at a much earlier time than Henry cares to cover.
You might be interested in the material following the bibliography, also. It even has reference using an article by Makow, Was Winston Churchill A "Soviet" Agent?. Of course, Churchill was a used old man, a jew himself (through his mother, Jenny Jerome) who was swayed by the jews, including the jew, FDR, and the jewish gang surrounding him in America, all of them assistants to jewish communism in Russia. "Soviets" IS the name of the jewish kahal in Russia.
The below is one of the best works I have seen on Freemasonary. I have the text below, in order to make another record of it, but you may prefer to check the link below and to view the page with the actual text and graphics. -----------------------------------
A Concise Appraisal by Ecclesia Apostolica Jesu Christi
Until the 17th century, there were only “operative Masons.” However, in circa 1600, Masonry evidently began initiating non-stonemasons into its ranks. This formed the final catalyst that brought modern Masonry into being. Most Masons trace their founding to the first “Mother” Lodge that met in a tavern in London on the feast of St John, 24th June 1717. This is a day held most sacred by the Knights Templar. In 1726 this lodge became the “Grand Lodge of all England.” This was followed by schisms between other “Grand Lodges,” both in England and on the Continent. In 1773, the second most influential Grand Lodge, the “Grand Orient” was formed in France. This brings us to a most significant date in modern Freemasonry ~ 1st May 1776 ~ when the final element in the equation of Freemasonry was introduced. It already possessed by this time strains of fertility cults, Islamic mysticism, alchemy, Templary and Rosicrucianism. These were symbolic stones in the arch that formed a doorway to witchcraft.
Adam Weishaupt [Individual titles are usually for photos or graphics showing at the link.]
The keystone on the arch was provided by an obscure Jesuit-trained professor of canon law at the University of Ingolstadt in Bavaria, Adam Weishaupt. The important date on the witchcraft calendar of May 1st was selected for the foundation of the Ancient and Illuminated Seers of Bavaria. It was founded on a mixture of Masonic secrets, Islamic mysticism and Jesuit mental discipline. The element that made it even more unique and dangerous was its scientific use of the drug Almamout Hashish to produce an “illuminated” state of mind. This was the drug of the Assassins. Illumination had long been a cherished component of Masonry and other occult groups. The Masonic candidate requests, and is promised, “light in Masonry.” As he goes up the ladder of initiation, he receives “more light.” It is because of this society’s emphasis on illumination that the Ancient and Illuminated Seers of Bavaria became known by its more common title of The Illuminati. The trapezoid (unfinished pyramid with four sides) is a most significant symbol in Satanism. The symbol is actually a metaphor for the oppressive hierarchy that reigns over the Masonic Lodge, and over many “democratic” governments, not least the American government where the all-seeing-eye above a trapezoid is used on the Great Seal of the United States (as depicted on the reverse of any dollar bill). The Illuminati eye is perched atop an incomplete pyramid with the date 1776 AD (the year Weishaupt founded the Illuminati) in Roman numerals at the bottom. The Muslim connection to the origins of Masonry is also difficult to ignore. The most glaring example in the world of the Lodge is, of course, the Shrine. The actual title of the Shriner organisation is the Ancient Arabic Order, Nobles of the Mystic Shrine. The Shrine is openly evocative of Arab culture and the “shrine” in Masonry is the sacred shrine of Islam in Mecca. A Shrine initiate must swear the usual oath on the Koran, in addition to the Bible, ending thus: “May Allah, the God of Arab, Moslem and Mohammedan, the God of our Fathers, support me to the entire fulfillment of the same, Amen, Amen, Amen.” (Shrine Ritual Monitor, Allen Publishing, pages 35-39). Muslims, of course, deny the deity of Jesus Christ and His Resurrection.
Masonic coat-of-arms.
An Illuminatus is a Master Mason who has received all the “light” Masonry can bestow. He is beyond 33°. Such people are known as Masters or Masters of the Temple, and collectively they are known by several names other than the Illuminati; but, whatever they are called, they form an elite cadre of “super-Masons” with understanding of the principles of Freemasonry far beyond even the typical 33° Mason. The Bavarian seers themselves can be traced back to a 16th century Muslim cult of illuminated men called the Roshaniya in Afghanistan. Again we see the pervasive influence of Islam in these secret orders. It was probably from this Afghan connection that Weishaupt acquired his knowledge of hashish.
Alex Sanders giving the sign of the Mason on the square.
Weishaupt affiliated himself with the Masons, joining the Munich Lodge, in 1777. He played on the egotism that runs through Masonry and created a secret order within a secret order. The most powerful image in Illuminist sorcery is the sign of Dagon (1 Samuel 5): the hand, palm forward with the five digits extended. Weishaupt taught that everything occurred in fives. Human history came in a cycle of five stages and someone who understood these could manipulate history to his own ends. The five stages were: Chaos; Discord; Confusion; Bureaucracy; Aftermath. Weishaupt gave wings to the geo-political ambitions of the Masons in a fashion not seen since the Templars. Though Masonry always had its political overtones, Weishaupt’s use of the Law of Fives, drugs and occult intrigues added momentum to the evil currents of the Lodge. This final fusion of statecraft with sorcery created the Freemasonry we know today without which modern witchcraft and the satanic revival of the 20th century would not have been possible. Every leading and influential witch, occultist and Satanist has invariably been a high-ranking Mason.
Aleister Crowley: his left-hand offering a Masonic sign.
Arthur Edward Waite, occult author, magician and Masonic historian, wrote an encyclopedia of Freemasonry. Dr Wynn Westcott, member of the Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia, was also a founding member of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn whose members introduced Tantric sex magic rituals to Western society as a form of worship. S L MacGregor Mathers co-founded the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. Aleister Crowley, pursued in letters by pseudo-scientist Alfred Kinsey for his “sexual experiences,” founded an anti-Christ religion called Thelema. Crowley, a master Satanist of the 20th century, advocated child sacrifice in one his published work Magick in Theory and Practice, used children in perverted sexual rituals, and held several Masonic titles including the highest (33°) in the Ancient and Accepted Rite, and the second highest (96°) in the Ancient and Primitive Rite. Dr Gerard Encaussé, (Papus) masterful author, exponent of the Tarot, and leader of the occult Martinistes Society. Dr Theodore Reuss, head of the German satanic society Ordo Templi Orientis. (The OTO was represented in the British Isles by Aleister Crowley). George Pickingill, witch and sorcerer in England and leader of the “Pickingill covens.” Annie Besant, leader of the occult Theosophical Society and Co-Masonic hierarch. (Yes, there are female Masons!) Alice Bailey, founder of the New Age Lucis (formerly Lucifer) Trust. C W Leadbetter, Theosophist, mentor of the failed avatar, or New Age “Christ,” Krishnamurti, and prelate in the occult Liberal Catholic Church. Manly P Hall, Rosicrucian adept and author of popular Freemasonry manuals. Gerald B Gardner, member of Crowley’s depraved Ordo Templi Orientis, and founder and practitioner of modern witchcraft, or, as it known, wicca. Alex Sanders, self-styled “King of the Witches” based in London, England, and one of the most influential leaders of wicca after Gardner. Freemasonry welcomed all of these occultists and sorcerers into its highest ranks. In addition many minor occultists are drawn to the Lodge by its mysterious power. While all levels of Masonry have their share of occultists and wiccans, the Illuminati, the Ancient rites and the Supreme Council are especially likely to have them.
Alex Sanders and his high priestess. There could not be a witchcraft and occult revival without Freemasonry.
Soon after the infiltration of Illuminism into Freemasonry at the end of the 18th century, another extraordinary figure emerged. His name was Albert Pike (1809-1891) and his impact was akin to that of Weishaupt’s. Pike became a Mason in 1850 and then, in a meteoric rise to power, was elected Grand Commander of the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States in 1859. He essentially made Scottish Rite Masonry the institution it is today, and expressed contempt for Christianity at every opportunity. One of his Masonic titles was “Sovereign Pontiff of Lucifer.” Pike regarded Lucifer as the true god, as do many witches and pagans today.
Symbol of the Ku Klux Klan.
Pike chose to follow the mystery religions of Baal. If we look at his writings and statements attributed to him, we find that he acknowledged Lucifer as the true god and Adonay (the Biblical God) as the “god of evil.” Pike’s “fruits” are definitely satanic (Matthew 7: 15-20). Pike was influenced by the Italian Freemason and revolutionary, Giuseppi Mazzini (1805-1872). Mazzini had formed a society in Sicily called the Oblonica that means “I reckon with a dagger.” As is typical with the Masons, Mazzini formed an order within an order. This elite inner group was called by a term most people will recognise ~ the Mafia. The name is an acronym for Mazzini autorizza furti, incendi, avvelenamenti ~ Mazzini authorises thefts, arson and poisoning. The Mafia was also known by another term, Il Mano Nigro ~ the Black Hand. Mafia crimes were often sealed by a black handprint at the scene. This, of course, was an Illuminati touch: the hand with palm forward and five digits extended. Pike helped create the Ku Klux Klan, a secret terrorist society in the southern states of America. No black men were ever admitted to Masonic Lodges in the Southern Jurisdiction. Thus Negroes were obliged to adapt their own form of Masonry that is called Prince Hall Masonry.
In 1870 Pike and Mazzini completed an agreement to create a supreme, universal rite of Masonry that would over-arch all the other rites, even the different national rites. It centralised all high Masonic bodies in the world under one head. This head was, ultimately, Lucifer. Pike an Mazzini were his human regents. To this end the Palladium Rite was created as the pinnacle of the pyramid of power. Palladism is necessarily a Luciferian rite. Its religion is Manichæan neo-gnosticism, teaching that the divinity is dual and that Lucifer is the equal of Adonay, with Lucifer the “god of light and goodness” struggling for humanity against Adonay the “god of darkness and evil.” Albert Pike had only specified and unveiled the dogmas of the high grades of all other masonries, for in no matter what rite, the Masonic “Great Architect of the Universe” is not the God worshipped by the Christians. The Luciferian doctrine is implicit in the lower degrees, and only becomes an explicit teaching on the highest degrees. The highest of the high was the Palladium: an international alliance to bring in the Grand Lodges, the Grand Orient, the ninety-seven degrees of Memphis and Mizraim (the Ancient and Primitive Rite), and the Scottish Rite (the Ancient and Accepted Rite).
The traditional Palladium imprecation is: “Glory and Love for Lucifer! Hatred! Hatred! Hatred! To God accursed! Accursed! Accursed!” Palladism took the fuel from Adam Weishaupt’s dangerous vision for humanity and connected the energy to the pistons of Freemasonry. Those pistons were then driven in rhythm by the Palladium. In common with other Gnostic cults, the Palladium teaches that the serpent told the truth in the Garden of Eden. Candidates are exposed to a five-step programme: (1) Adoption: This is where the Mason is brought into the “fellowship” of Lucifer. He is guided into swearing an oath and being yoked to the temple of Lucifer. Ultimately, he is led into making a pact with Lucifer. (2) Illumination: Through drugs and occult techniques of the seers, the so-called Third Eye is opened. This “eye,” or the Ajna chakra, is felt to be the point of contact between humans and Lucifer consciousness. It is supposedly located in the forehead, above and between the two visible eyes. To “open” the eye a little is to experience psychic powers. To open it completely is to have the mind flooded with “pure” Luciferic consciousness. This is why one of the Masonic symbols is the “all-seeing-eye.” It is a symbol of Illumination. (3) Conversation: This involves communicating with the “mighty dead.” Spiritualism plays a significant part in the Palladium. Mediumship is encouraged and “conversation” with the sages of history is vital. (4) Congress: The initiate is led into being literally “married” to these dead. Usually this is done by having a medium of the appropriate gender become possessed by the “dead spirit” (ie demon), and then a sacrilegious wedding ceremony is consummated. It is believed that the magical “virtue” of the spirit flows from the possessed medium into the initiate through the act of intimacy. (5) Union: At this point, the soul of the initiate is totally eclipsed by the evil spirit. This is known as “perfect possession” and takes years of inviting the demons to come and own the person.
The Royal Arch degree is the climax of Craft Masonry. It is described as “the root and marrow of Freemasonry” and is the complete story of Jewish history during some of its darkest hours. In the 7°, the Royal Arch, the name Jah-Bul-On is discovered.
Only to those Master Masons who elect to be exalted to the Holy Royal Arch degree of Masonry is the “lost name” of their supreme being revealed. This “Grand Omnific Royal Arch Word” and “ineffable name” is contrary to everything ordinary Craft Freemasons have previously been told about the Mason’s god: TGAOTU (The Great Architect of the Universe). They cease to be free to believe in a generic term for God, according to their personal creed, or religion, but must now subscribe to Freemasonry’s idolatrous, unholy and counterfeit trinity composed of three deities: JAH-BUL-ON. (1) Jahweh, the Old Testament or Jewish Tanakh name for Almighty God; (2) Baal, the Canaanite fertility god associated with licentious rites and imitative magic; and (3) Osiris, the Ancient Egyptian god of the underworld. The 16th century demonologist, John Weir, identified Baal as a demon. Freemasonry is found to be contrary to the first three of the ten commandments, and denies Christ as “Lord of Lords and King of Kings” and “the only name by which we are saved.” In the words of Pike himself Jahbulon is “a mongrel word, in part composed of the name of an accursed and beastly heathen god whose name has been for more than two thousand years an appellation of the Devil.” In Morals and Dogma, Pike states that Masonry is the universal religion and that senior Masons take a conscious decision to mislead and deceive those in the lower degrees: “There true interpretation is reserved for the Princes of Masonry.”
The Order Knights Templar is conferred in the Order of the Temple. It was founded in the 12th century and is considerably older than Craft Masonry in its present form. It defines the eleven rituals and laws governing state and local level organisations. The state level is called a Grand Commandery of Knights Templar. This represents members of a state or an area of equivalent size. The local level is called a Commandery of Knights Templar. Women, Negroes and the poor are not admitted. The Templars are said to have represented the first wide-scale attempt to organise and mobilise the forces of occultism for the purpose of gaining control of the world. Today’s Masonic symbol is the same as worn by the Knights Templar of old who at first were a Christian-orientated organisation founded in the 11th century to protect and defend pilgrims travelling to Jerusalem. Over the years the Templars became tainted with the Islamic mysticism and Gnosticism embraced by some while in Palestine. They became further contaminated by a sect known as the Assassins. The Order of Knights Templar inevitably degenerated, and some are believed to have engaged in the practice of Phallicism, or sex worship, and Satanism ~ venerating Baphomet, the idol of Luciferians. The crime of sodomy was eventually a rite of Templar initiation. Freemasonry is clearly Luciferian worship, despite their very clever attempts to hide this fact. The Grand Master at the time when King Philip IV of France tried and executed key members, was named Jacques de Molay. Since de Molay was Grand Master of the Knights Templar, it can be assumed he was also involved in these satanic and homosexual acts. “DeMolay” is somewhat disturbingly one of the orders of Freemasonry for young men.
According to the New Catholic Encyclopedia (Imprimatur: +Patrick A O’Boyle, Archbishop of Washington, 5th August 1966): “Membership in, associating with, or contributing to any aspect of Freemasonry under any title, including Mason, Freemason, Illuminati, Shriner, Order of the Eastern Star, Order of DeMolay, and many others, even if believed for a worthy cause (children’s hospital) or under the guise of entertainment (circus), should be understood as a grave offence against God. No organisation that is a separation from Freemasonry or a mimic thereof should be seen as anything but humanistic and self-serving. While any theist should be strongly opposed to any taint of Freemasonry, for Catholics it constitutes automatic excommunication once they have knowledge that the teachings of the Church proscribe any association or activity related to them.”
Twenty-one years after the organisation of the Grand Lodge of England, Catholics were forbidden to seek membership in any Masonic group. In the bull In Eminenti of 28th April 1736, Clement XII condemned Freemasonry in the first of twenty bulls against Freemasonry. Since 1738 seven other popes have specifically proscribed Freemasonry: Benedict XIV, Pius VII, Leo XIII, Pius VIII, Gregory XVI, Pius IX, and Leo XIII. Pius IX issued six bulls attacking Masonry. In 1884, Leo XIII, in Humanum Genus, endorsed the view that the Freemasons’ “real supreme aim” is “to persecute Christianity with untamed hatred, and they will never rest until they see cast to the ground all religious institutions established by the Pope.” The following words issued by Cardinal Ratzinger were approved and ordered by John Paul II in November 1983: “The Church’s negative judgment in regard to Masonic associations remains unchanged since their principles have always been considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church and therefore membership in them remains forbidden. Catholics who enrol in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion. Local Ecclesiastical authorities do not have the faculty to pronounce a judgment on the nature of Masonic associations which may include a diminution of the above-mentioned judgment.”
Baptist leaders have referred to Freemasonry as “an ungodly brotherhood of satanic darkness”; “there is an inherent incompatibility between Masonry and the Christian faith”; “there is a great danger that the Christian Mason may find himself compromising his allegiance to Jesus.” (The Baptist Union of Scotland, 1965).
Lutherans say “Masonry amounts to idolatry.” (Missouri Synod, 1959).
Presbyterians: “Masonry is a religious institution and as such is definitely anti-Christian.” (General Assembly, Rochester, 1942).
Methodists: “There is a great danger that the Christian who becomes a Freemason will find himself compromising his Christian beliefs. Methodists should not become Masons.” (General Assembly, London, 1985).
The Church of England: “A number of very fundamental reasons to question the compatibility of Freemasonry with Christianity.” (General Synod, London, 1987 ~ where several members of the committee were Masons!)
Russian Orthodox Church: “Any Orthodox who joins Masonry loses all the right and privileges of his membership in the Church.” (Strange Altars, Acker, page 60).
Roman Catholic Archbishop Emanuel Milingo: “We are now in the last days of Satan’s reign and he is working overtime through his agents to complete the takeover of the world. His agents are nothing less than the Freemasons who have permeated to the very heart of Christ’s Church. It is the task of Freemasons to lull Christians, especially priests, into believing that the Devil and his demons do not exist. Satan plays with priests like toys when they do not believe in him. After the last war bring young Freemasons were placed in seminaries around the world. These agents of Satan were waiting for their time to come. … The Freemason antichrists became priests for this purpose. They aim to take religious power throughout the world, just as they have taken economic and political power.” (Powers of Darkness, Powers of Light, Cornwell, 1991).
“Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the traditions of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ.”
Additional information regarding the historical formation of Freemasonary and it's use as a jewish and Rothschild consortium tool can be found in a book by Eustace Mullins, Curse of Canaan. This book also details more about the jewish identities, including Weishaupt's. - I have not been able to access that book's link recently, but will post it's link when it is available.
This blog is produced with the intention of getting important information out to a wider audience. Please feel free to reproduce any articles which you find of interest. All I ask is that you publish the articles in their original form, or specify where you have made changes. Also please mention this blog as the source, so others may explore the various articles published here.
The blog is published independently of any organisation and the links attached are purely of personal interest. Enjoy and reproduce as you will...
